• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. Source A is from an American history book it was published in 1973. Source B is from a book about American history and it was published in 1979. Both sources clearly agree on prohibitions consequences,they clearly agree that after the law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework a) Source A is from an American history book it was published in 1973. Source B is from a book about American history and it was published in 1979. Both sources clearly agree on prohibition's consequences, they clearly agree that after the law of prohibition organised crime was increased. Source A gives many reasons why prohibition was introduced for example "Bad influences of saloons, preserving grain for food, although I believe the most important reason was "Anti saloon leagues." Both sources A and B both agree that the law of prohibition rapidly increased organised crime. It shows that the more people wanted to drink and people were happy to supply. By 1928 there were more than 30,000 speakeasies in New York. Both sources agree that prohibition led to gangsters and Bootleggers. The only differences between the two sources are source A gives many reasons why prohibition was introduced. Such as "Bad influences of salons." Source B on the other hand only states one reason to why prohibition was introduced. It was because of the Women's Temperance Union. They had joined a crusade to fight alcoholism. Overall sources A and B are both quite similar they both agree that prohibition was a failure. ...read more.

Middle

Source G clearly shows that in 1921 there were 9,746 illegal stilts seized and this shows that the actual number could be more because not everyone would have been caught. There was also 414,000 spirits seized. By 1929 there were 15,794 illegal stilts seized, and there were 11,860,000 gallons of spirits seized. This figure is not 100% accurate because of the reason discussed earlier. This is due to some gangsters such as Alphonse Capone they would bootleg alcohol and bribe police so they could bring in illegal alcohol into the country and sell it in speakeasies. Speakeasies were illegal saloons. Source H is from the city of Philadelphia police department, and it shows that the number of arrests for drinking related offences between the years 1920 and 1935 it clearly shows that the statistics prove that there was more crime and illegal alcohol on the streets. These statistics could also be much higher this is because some of the police may have been corrupt and not everyone may have been caught. Another factor is that the statistics about the arrests were only from the state of Philadelphia, In conclusion from these two sources we can clearly see that prohibition was a failure. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source H also proves that prohibition was a great failure instead of less people getting drunk and being arrested for being drunk and committing crime, so this shows that the law was completely ignored and even the superiors were corrupt. Source I also shows that prohibition was a failure, this is because many superior officers were corrupt and had taken bribes, this meant gangsters such as Al Capone, source J supports this it explains how the police were bribed and could not do anything about prohibition. Source J also supports that prohibition was inevitable as it shows a large group of police men, prohibition agents and politicians receiving bribes to allow prohibition to take place. Therefore this strongly supports the fact that prohibition was inevitable as the police officers and prohibition officers were being paid to keep a blind eye towards prohibition. In conclusion some of the sources clearly show that prohibition was inevitable and others support that it was not inevitable. Source I clearly suggests that prohibition was inevitable because a lot of prohibition seniors who should be enforcing the law were taking backhanders. Although source B shows that the numbers of speakeasies were just outnumbering the amount of prohibition agents. ?? ?? ?? ?? Mohammed Moneeb Mr Carrol ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    This is useful to us because it shows that because of the depression they cannot buy essentials like clothes. Despite what the source tells us about living conditions the source is limited because it is not the whole report, source D only shows part of a report, so you do

  2. Why was prohibition introduced

    by Europe's problems; in turn this meant that America had a strong economy and was able to supply the demand for goods required by the American people. 3b. WHY WAS PROHIBITION REPEALED? Prohibition was repealed by congress in 1933 for many reasons.

  1. GCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Was the New Deal a Success?

    individualism' as newspapers were the only type of support they had for themselves. It is ironic as they called the newspapers they used for support after president Hoover, as if they were to say this is how much support you give me.

  2. American History Coursework

    This proved substantially effective in providing sustenance, refuge, & employment for various sections of the community, & contributed to a more joyous, protected America. The desperation of the majority of Americans (the exploitive owners of super corporations such as Henry Ford being the exception)

  1. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    I can also see from source C that nobody is carrying any shopping bags. This backs up the paragraph above as it proves that nobody is buying anything because they have no money.

  2. History - Prohibition

    But some sources, however, are less reliable than others due to various factors, such as the time in which and by whom they were written. Source E supports prohibition. It was written by John D. Rockefeller Jr., who was a very wealthy industrialist.

  1. Prohibition - source based questions.

    Or it could be suggesting that the state was actively trying to pursue the offenders of the 18th amendment. That they wanted be seen to be making a lot of arrests, to show that they were serious about tackling people who broke the law, but when it came to trial there was never enough proof.

  2. Prohibition - source based research.

    That fact that many people saw the prohibition of alcohol as a good idea is understandable. Many people thought it would end bad behaviour in night-clubs, pubs etc. People also thought it would save people a lot of money, make their families happier and many thought the general happiness of the country would eventually increase.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work