• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework: Specification: OCR Modern World History GCSE History B 1937 Assignment 2 Center No: 25210 Center Name: John Cleveland College Candidate Number: ****** Question A: Sources A & B are similar in that they are both secondary sources, and they were both written in the 1970's. However they differ in their presentation of information and disagree on causes of prohibition. Source A explains well to the reader why people were in support of a ban on alcohol at that time. The language used is extreme and in support of the decision made - e.g. moral fervour, greatest, no earlier law passed by constitution went against peoples livelihood. It does not mention anything that happened after the introduction of the 'Volstead Act' (1919) apart from the eventual, and perhaps inevitable, failure of prohibition. Source A does not provide evidence for its sensational claims, only offering an interpretation. For example it states that prohibition brought about " the greatest criminal boom... perhaps in all modern history" but does not back up this statement. Whereas Source B is very specific and goes into more detail about the effects of prohibition, giving facts and a quotation from the time. The sources differ in the amount of detail they provide on the reasons for which prohibition was introduced- Source A offers "a number of possible explanations" as to the popularity of the pro-prohibition groups. Source A acknowledges the fact that most people had stopped drinking during the war because grain was needed for food, and the breweries were mainly owned by German-American immigrants, so most people. Source B states only that it was a nationwide 'crusade' led by the Anti-Saloon League that brought about the "amendment to the Constitution". Source B does not dispute against alcohol being "one of the greatest evils of the time". Also it does not include any information on the after effects of this law. ...read more.

Middle

Prohibition must have been a failure, because he visited saloons, although technically there should not have been any saloons as they were illegal according to the Volstead act. However he says, if you tried to enforce the law they'd (his superior officers) put you in a post were there was nothing but weeds." So the superior officers were definitely corrupt because they ignored the speakeasies, this would probably be because they were receiving bribes from the speakeasies' owners. He also mentions this saying that: "It was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved in it." So the supposed upholders of the law were ignoring the illegal goings on, as they were bribed to do so. Source I is a real representation of what the supposed law enforcers were actually doing- receiving bribes then turning a blind eye to the illegal doings. So source J is not proved but supported- this corruption was going on everywhere at every level in the force. Source J only describes that particular police force. It doesn't mention anything about the magistrates or any of the other higher levels of the police force. The author also does not mention any other region or city in the country. Question F: Source A is a very generalised source, which describes the causes of prohibition, such as the nationalistic decision to stop drinking alcohol during the war because most breweries were owned by German-American immigrants, also grain was needed for food. Source A does not state or suggest that Prohibition was going to be inevitable. It describes the possible causes for the introduction of the law and then the after effects, however the last line says: "For no other law had gone against the daily habits, customs and desires of many Americans. " This suggests that although the failure of the law was not inevitable, most Americans would have been disappointed against the ruling and gone against it because they "desired" to have alcohol. ...read more.

Conclusion

This source does not say that prohibition was bound to failure as soon as it was introduced, but if the enforcers weren't doing their job then it wasn't going to be a success. Source I is a policeman talking about what it was like during prohibition. He says that "my superior officers were involved in it" this shows how far the corruptness went, all levels of the police force were involved in it. He was given an envelope, which contained $75 once after being sent to a certain region in Chicago. The enforcement agencies could not compete with the money the speakeasy owners had, and although they had previously been a rarity, cops who were accepting bribes became the majority. Also in the source he says: "you couldn't pay for anything" the speakeasy owners were very confident, and they knew they weren't going to be arrested. Another quote is "if you tried, to enforce the law" because of the common knowledge that the superior officers were in with the speakeasy owners, all of the policemen followed their example. This source shows just what the enforcers were up against, and how hard the law was to enforce, it doesn't say anything about prohibition being a failure from the start. Notes: 23 states had already introduced a ban on alcohol by 1917. This would mainly have been in the strictly religious south. Other factors for the nationwide anti-alcohol campaign are the population mainly consisted of women, as a large number of American men in the armed forces that were fighting over in France and so it was a mainly female population left back at home. And additionally German-American immigrants owned the main breweries and grain (a main ingredient of beer) was needed for food -the sources agree on this factor, saying that most people were for the banning of grain for the use of distilling or brewing. Those two factors were a mainly a result of the war and patriotism. Laurence Oglesby 11-T18 Page 1 of 8 Assignment 2: "Was Prohibition bound to fail?" ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. The crash (causes and consequences of the Wall Street Crash)

    I remember seeing a hunger march to City Hall. It was a very cold, bitter day. My boss was looking out the window with me. I didn't know what the hell it was. He says 'They ought to lock the bastards up'.

  2. Why was prohibition introduced

    The European competition for international markets had been temporarily weakened by World War One and demands for post war recovery led to a growth in U.S. export markets, reflecting "supply and demand". Many businesses had made large profits during World War One this meant that these companies had the money

  1. Why did prohibition fail?

    Nobody could argue that Prohibition had made the USA prosperous. Capone was sentenced to 11 years in jail on 24th October 1931 and in 1933 Prohibition was finally abolished. Was the reason for Prohibition failing that the gangsters took control of the illegal alcohol industry?

  2. History - Prohibition

    It was not until 1916 that 21 states had banned saloons. Source D's message is more subtle than that of source C. This is probably due to the fact that American citizens were more aware of the situation by 1915 and so did not need the message to be as

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    I cannot find anything on source H, which makes me doubt its reliability, so I personally think the reliability of source H is good as its portrayal of the prohibition is impartial. As source H confirms the banning of alcohol criminalised all of American society.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    The bottle was there and you were supposed to drink it'. It also explains how they made law enforcers accept bribes 'He handed me an envelope, I took it and he was gone'. The money was there and the law enforcers were just meant to take it.

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    were in power, who believed in a laissez-faire form of government - and additionally many sources suggest there was a widespread demand for an introduction of prohibition - Despite this, and for many reasons, the failure of prohibition was inevitable.

  2. The effects of Industrialization and globalisation.

    And the reason for that increase might be indirectly related to the legacy of globalization. Of course, we all have basic emotional needs for food, water, and shelter. But in developed countries these needs often become confused. Luxuries are disguised as basic needs, and people are made to feel inadequate if they don't display evidence of material prosperity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work