• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This makes them secondary sources. The sources talk about Prohibition and the effects it had on the USA.

Extracts from this document...


Sources A and B, How far do these accounts agree about Prohibition? Prohibition in the USA refers to the attempts to ban alcohol sale and consumption in the USA. The term often refers to the time period of 1920 to 1930. During this time alcohol sales, transport and manufacture was banned in the USA. However people would try all means necessary to get hold of alcohol. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970's. This makes them secondary sources. The sources talk about Prohibition and the effects it had on the USA. Sources A and B agree and disagree with prohibition. The sources agree that prohibition brought with it ALOT of crime. Source A backs this up with the statement "It created the biggest criminal boom in American history". Source B backs this up with the statement "Gangsters like Dutch Schulz and Al Capone had turned the avoidance of alcohol into big violent businesses." The law however did try to prevent this from happening, but when the forces were corrupt; taking bribes from offenders, it was going to be impossible. Sources A and B also agree that it was after the war and grain had been used up a lot during the war and the manufacture of alcohol was using up a lot of grain when it should have been used on the food production. Source A backs this statement up by saying "the wartime concern for preserving grain", source B also backs the statement up by saying "Brought pressure to bear on the congress to ban the use of grain for either brewing or distilling". They also agree on the influence of the anti saloon league. The source may agree on many things but it also disagrees on other things such as the year in on which the amendment was passed for the prohibition law. Source A states "by 1917 twenty three states had already introduced the ban on alcohol" and source B states "In 1919 the amendment was passed and the manufacture, sale and transportation of liquor was banned.". ...read more.


He has also written it in the form of what he has seen. Source F is as biased as it can be as it was the commissioner's job to enforce prohibition. He has almost threatened the USA in his speech. Do sources G and H prove that prohibition was successful? Sources G and H show and prove that prohibition was successful and unsuccessful. Source G shows that the federal government agents were successful to a great extent in seizing thousands of stills and millions of gallons of spirits. In 1921 9,746 illegal stills were seized and by 1929 15,794 were seized. This shows that agents were doing their job. Also in 1921, 414,000 gallons of spirits were seized and by 1929, 11,860,0000 gallons were seized. Source H that drunk and disorderly conduct arrests were successful. The results show this, as there is decrease from 6,097 in 1921 to 5,522 in 1925 in Philadelphia. However as we have seen from previous sources, there are more unsuccessful consequences of prohibition than successful. Source G though successful in many ways, is also unsuccessful. The fact that the federal government are seizing more and more stills every 4 years and that gallons of spirits seized rised to a whopping 11,860,000 in 8 years shows people weren't obeying the prohibition law. I also know that one possible cause of the rise is that alcohol was being imported from Canada and Mexico. Prohibition commissioners could not sop this due to lack of commissioners and corruption. In source H for drink related offences it shows that the number of drunks went from 14,313 in 1920 to 51,361 in 1925. This proves that prohibition was not working and that it made people drink more and get drunk. As I mentioned earlier drunk and disorderly conduct did go down, however one reason for this could have been that people knew they would get arrested if seen drunk so they would often drink in a quiet hidden away area to cancel any risk of getting arrested. ...read more.


Source G shows alcohol seized from 1921 to 1929. There is a huge increase over that period of time. This suggests in the years to come that more and more alcohol will be seized every year. This meant prohibition was going to fail. Source H is a lot like source G in terms of figures, a there is a huge increase in total drunk related offences in Philadelphia. This is in one state and by 1925 there were a whopping 57,703 offences. There are many bigger states, which suggests there will be a huge amount of illegal alcohol in the USA. This agrees with the statement "was prohibitions failure inevitable. Sources I and J both show that police officers, agents and anyone with high authority took bribes. Source I show 7 government officials doing the backhand. They are willing to take a bribe. Source J was written by a policeman in the 1920's, during prohibition. He talks about how easy it was to get alcohol and how a bribe would be forced on you before you had even got into the town. This supports the title because it shows that the law could not be enforced if the law enforcers were breaking the law. Source C, D and F are the only sources that supported prohibition and prove that it was not bound to fail. Both sources C and D are posters that show that families go without food, clothes and shoes because the father spends all the money on alcohol. This proves the failure was not inevitable because it presents a strong reason why people should support prohibition. The first commissioner of prohibition wrote source F and he says, "The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small. Where it is not obeyed, it will be enforced." This shows that the law enforcers will work to make the law work. It is a strong reason to support prohibition. In conclusion to this, most of the sources support the fact the failure of prohibition was inevitable. Those sources present strong information on why prohibitions failure was inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Why was prohibition introduced

    on the margin", this was a loan to buy stocks .The middle classes saw this as a "get rich quick" scheme and started buying up any stocks they could in the hope of making money. All sections of society enjoyed success and were not afraid to display their wealth.

  2. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    This helped introduce the policy, but too many people disliked the policy, and were unwilling to co-operate with the law, and it proved that they still wanted alcohol, and were willing to pay large amounts of money for it. 3.Source D is a photograph from the 1920's and source E

  1. Roosevelt Sources Question

    It shows that he had put in 16 billion dollars into it but still there was seven thousand million still to put into it. The caption shows Roosevelt saying that he hopes that its going to work, he believes it does.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    remedying the situation to the point at which the law would have been obeyed to a fair extent. Source A states that "By 1917, twenty-three states had already introduced a ban on alcohol" - this suggests that even before the law was made national, many Americans wanted the introduction of prohibition.

  1. Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

    His opinions also agree with that of the Anti- saloon league and the Women's Christian Temperance Union like Rockerfellers does. 'Liquor must not be manufactured...' shows that his views agree with that of the Anti- Saloon league, 'Grain should be preserved...'.

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    So he wouldn't have been able to go shopping as he would have had no money. Source C does support source A as it shows Jarrow in desperate times. Clearly people are suffering if they are unemployed and walking around aimlessly. This is how Jarrow is described in source A.

  1. How useful are sources D and E in helping you to understand the effects ...

    The depression hit Jarrow badly. Poverty could lead to ill health. You can see from the description that people in Jarrow lived in unhygienic houses. We can see this because it says ''the room is crowded and hot''.

  2. To What extent was Prohibtion doomed to fail from its inception?

    they overlooked the American people's desire for alcohol and their willingness to do anything to get it. However no concrete evidence was seen to support their view. The government to some extent succeeded in banning alcohol, as production was halted and bars were closed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work