• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen How far do you agree? I feel the Prohibition act of January 16th, 1919-20 seemed like a good idea to start with and therefore strongly agree with this statement, I think the law had to be executed becaus

Extracts from this document...


Planning and Writing an Extended Essay "Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen" How far do you agree? In cities, saloons were opened up in busy parts of different neighbourhoods and in one city saloons outnumbered churches 31 to 1. People began to believe drinking would destroy character, corrupt politics, and cause crime and unrestrained sexuality. Women were huge supporters of prohibiting because it was a leading cause of spousal abuse and they were the main victim. I feel the Prohibition act of January 16th, 1919-20 seemed like a good idea to start with and therefore strongly agree with this statement, I think the law had to be executed because of reasons such as Pressure groups like the anti-saloon group who I feel were fighting for a just cause for alcohol ban; Crime rates in America as a whole was very high and car robbery, theft etc were on the increase and it was thought by many that this was cause by alcohol and it was becoming a big problem in America which affected everyone no matter who they were. The national mood of Americans changed since they joined the war in 1917 and most places especially in rural areas were voting for politicians who backed up prohibition. ...read more.


The pressure groups propaganda and media shows and supports how alcohol was a big problem in American in the end of the eighteenth century and early 90s and it justifies my claim that prohibition was a good idea from the beginning. In my opinion I feel the pressure groups against prohibition makes my view stronger because they quote many problems with alcohol in this time period. However, I feel that the pressure group thought and blamed too many things on prohibition and that they do not have any evidence to back their points up and it is truly biased and in their opinion and views were only based upon what they singly thought and not all over USA. Crime rate was another big reason for America prohibiting alcohol in the 19th century. Crime rates were on the increase and it was a big problem, people blamed this on the abuse of alcohol mainly which caused anti-social behaviour, and people thought that it was the root of the devil taking over a human's body. This Source describes prison population increasing up to the point of 1919 when 75% of states Of America prohibited alcohol. This shows that presidents and the government were coming under pressure to tackle this problem crime rate which was affecting American lives every single day. ...read more.


Alcohol ban was a heard message and even by celebrities like John D. Rockfeller who donated seventy five thousand dollars each year to pressure groups on alcohol. This shows important people such as celebrities would put money and other benifits away for a just cause which they found was the ban of alcohol In conclusion, I do still believe prohibition was a good idea and was not a disaster waiting to happen but instead a good idea. I feel these subsection arguements have made my arguement stronger as a whole and i feel they justify that alcohol ban was a good idea. We know that prohibition failed and crime rates increased, but from looking at this from a presidents view makes it the only nonprobibale answer. I feel prohibition did some effect of american society which was a main problem with the consumption of alcohol and family life improved as a outcome even if it was replaced by increased crime rates and more disasterous problems continuing in the 1930s. Overall, prohibition was a good idea and it was going to succseed as an outcome of predictions carried out by the state. Cartoons from the period of time show both sides of my arguement which vary with indivual opinions and thoughts. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kalvir Kalsi 10CDC ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History - Prohibition

    This source also shows that the total number of arrests made in Philadelphia in 1920 was 20,410, but by 1925, this had increased to 57,703. On the other hand, there was a decrease in the number of those arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct (from 6,097 in 1920, to 5,522

  2. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    Source 10 reveals the extent which prohibition affected American society, which is also supported by source 9. The extract from source 10 states,'10 years ago a dishonest policeman man was a rarity...now the honest ones are pointed out as the rarities.'

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    This put even more pressure on the politicians and now some of them started to use prohibition as one of their promises if they got voted in. The first state to go dry was Kansas and as soon as prohibition was passed in the state of Kansas there were noticeable differences.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    Source F was written by John F Kramer, the first prohibition commissioner in 1920, it was his job to enforce prohibition. I think that source E gives more reliable evidence about prohibition. A wealthy industrialist wrote source E and a wealthy industrialist would not have played a strong part in prohibition.

  1. prohibition of alcohol in america

    to hide the bribery that was going on, in which case shows that prohibition was unsuccessful. Similar to source G, source H shows us the number of drunken people, the drunk and disorderly conduct and drunk drivers in a period of five years (1920 to 1925).

  2. 'The Devil's Decade' - How far do you agree with this assessment of the ...

    unemployment peak of 3 million quickly declined and unemployment only really ever affected certain regions, mainly in the North. In Southern regions where new industries were being established, unemployment did not pose as a problem. For instance, in Birmingham where vechicle production dominated the whole country, output rose from 95,000

  1. Prohibition of Alcohol.

    Two years later in 1925 there were 58517; this was an increase of 38074. However, 'drunk and disorderly conduct' went up and "1920.6097" then "1923.8067 (up) but then "1925.5522" (down) this could be due to the fact that they were not arrested because of bribes offered to officers.

  2. USA: 1919 1941 Revision Notes

    with violence and drinking Leads to 1917 literacy test act, 1921 immigration quota (3%), 1924 National Origins Act (3% -> 2%), 1929 immigration act (limited to 150,000, with no Asians) * Employment: Advancement in technology meant less workers were required, and many former immigrants now looked down upon the ?lower

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work