• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen How far do you agree? I feel the Prohibition act of January 16th, 1919-20 seemed like a good idea to start with and therefore strongly agree with this statement, I think the law had to be executed becaus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Planning and Writing an Extended Essay "Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen" How far do you agree? In cities, saloons were opened up in busy parts of different neighbourhoods and in one city saloons outnumbered churches 31 to 1. People began to believe drinking would destroy character, corrupt politics, and cause crime and unrestrained sexuality. Women were huge supporters of prohibiting because it was a leading cause of spousal abuse and they were the main victim. I feel the Prohibition act of January 16th, 1919-20 seemed like a good idea to start with and therefore strongly agree with this statement, I think the law had to be executed because of reasons such as Pressure groups like the anti-saloon group who I feel were fighting for a just cause for alcohol ban; Crime rates in America as a whole was very high and car robbery, theft etc were on the increase and it was thought by many that this was cause by alcohol and it was becoming a big problem in America which affected everyone no matter who they were. The national mood of Americans changed since they joined the war in 1917 and most places especially in rural areas were voting for politicians who backed up prohibition. ...read more.

Middle

The pressure groups propaganda and media shows and supports how alcohol was a big problem in American in the end of the eighteenth century and early 90s and it justifies my claim that prohibition was a good idea from the beginning. In my opinion I feel the pressure groups against prohibition makes my view stronger because they quote many problems with alcohol in this time period. However, I feel that the pressure group thought and blamed too many things on prohibition and that they do not have any evidence to back their points up and it is truly biased and in their opinion and views were only based upon what they singly thought and not all over USA. Crime rate was another big reason for America prohibiting alcohol in the 19th century. Crime rates were on the increase and it was a big problem, people blamed this on the abuse of alcohol mainly which caused anti-social behaviour, and people thought that it was the root of the devil taking over a human's body. This Source describes prison population increasing up to the point of 1919 when 75% of states Of America prohibited alcohol. This shows that presidents and the government were coming under pressure to tackle this problem crime rate which was affecting American lives every single day. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alcohol ban was a heard message and even by celebrities like John D. Rockfeller who donated seventy five thousand dollars each year to pressure groups on alcohol. This shows important people such as celebrities would put money and other benifits away for a just cause which they found was the ban of alcohol In conclusion, I do still believe prohibition was a good idea and was not a disaster waiting to happen but instead a good idea. I feel these subsection arguements have made my arguement stronger as a whole and i feel they justify that alcohol ban was a good idea. We know that prohibition failed and crime rates increased, but from looking at this from a presidents view makes it the only nonprobibale answer. I feel prohibition did some effect of american society which was a main problem with the consumption of alcohol and family life improved as a outcome even if it was replaced by increased crime rates and more disasterous problems continuing in the 1930s. Overall, prohibition was a good idea and it was going to succseed as an outcome of predictions carried out by the state. Cartoons from the period of time show both sides of my arguement which vary with indivual opinions and thoughts. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kalvir Kalsi 10CDC ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History - Prohibition

    Although in 1920, he says he will do his job properly, this was said before the rise of the gangsters and so he could have become corrupted by bribery as many commissioners and law enforcer were during the 1920s. We know that by the late 1920s, the bribery and terror tactics of gangsters had made the enforcement of Prohibition ineffective.

  2. 'The Devil's Decade' - How far do you agree with this assessment of the ...

    As an effect, the number of vehicles on the roads doubled by 1939 and by the end of the thirties over 400,000 people were employed in the industry. Not only did new factories provide new jobs, but so too

  1. Prohibition of Alcohol.

    This also shows that the public opinion towards prohibition was negative. Being from the time of prohibition shows this to be a trustworthy source. In source N, a speech by 'President Roosevelt' we are shown that the publics' attitudes against prohibition were still strong.

  2. Economic Problems - What was the state of the coalfield 1919-39?

    The workers would be called 'scabs' or 'blacklegs.' During the strike, there were many different ways to control the work place. In September 1935, miners at Nine Mile Point colliery in the village of Cwmfelinfach tried to stop the blacklegs from working. They would go to work but at the end of the shift they would not move.

  1. Source work on prohibition

    Source B is taken from a book called, "Success in the 20^th century world affairs" which suggests that is from a book about success's in the 20^th century, so it would not specifically concentrate on particular decade or events in that decade, but it has information about 10 decades which

  2. prohibition of alcohol in america

    However both have different attitudes and approaches towards the issue; source A disagrees and source B agrees with the prohibition. (b) Introduction Sources C and D are posters from the Early 1900's. They both exhibit significant messages regarding the prohibition of alcohol.

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    The diseases that the WCTU blamed the alcohol for were gout, plasy, dropsy and epilepsy, but due to recent research it is now known that alcohol dose not cause these diseases but aggravates them. Another way that the WCTU contributed to the introduction of prohibition was to tell the people of America that their cultures were under threat.

  2. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    One of the reasons for my opinion is that firstly this is an extract from a New York saloon. In my opinion I feel that the saloon keeper is biased in his opinion. For example, how would he know what they earn for him to say that they spend 75% of their earnings in his bar?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work