• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Study Sources E & F: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition? The reliability of a source is important to historians and so in order to make a valid point using sources the reliability must be tested. For this reason, I will be looking at the reliability of both sources and by analyzing both I will determine which source is more reliable. Source E is in the form of a letter written in 1932 by John D Rockerfeller Jr. who was from a very recognizable and highly respected wealthy family in America at the time. They had one of the most powerful influences on the United States and had a personal wealth exceeding a cool $1 billion and the person who had the greatest share of this was John D Rockerfeller Jr. and thus making him a very influential business man in America. Due to the high standards and the highly respected status of John D Rockerfeller, source E can be said to be very reliable. ...read more.


'The day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol...'He also believed that alcohol was a vile thing and caused corruption like the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union. There are some aspects of the source which make it a lot less reliable. The fact that it is one persons account makes us question its reliability. Rockerfeller may be exaggerating the failure little especially since he was a huge supporter of Prohibition. This source could in fact be the view of a very narrow group of American Philanthropists where as on the other hand the general public may have had a very different view. Also, the source shows no references to actual facts and shows no figures which weakens Rockerfellers argument because it then shows that his points are more of his opinion and he doesn't specify and go into detail. He only generalises each point. Other sources like source G & H use facts and figures and so there reliability is valued more. ...read more.


Secondly, this source can also be seen to be highly bias, thus making it unreliable. It was a speech, meant to be heard and so bias views would be expected in order to convince people to support it prohibition. It is designed to persuade people and make the do what you want and so the source is can be said to not be very reliable at all. In conclusion, I find that source E is more reliable then F. It was written towards the end of the prohibition era and was not designed to persuade anyone unlike source F. The writer was given the advantage of seeing what was happening during the era and so his argument to me is more reliable and valuable. Source F can only be used to explain how and why prohibition came about and what affected the public's attitude. Source F can show that prohibition was started and the law makers had innocent intentions however source F shows haw badly it failed because it discusses everything that happened during the era and not what was believed to happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The support he had for Prohibition at the start leads us to believe that he did not think the failure of prohibition was inevitable as otherwise he would have been against it.

  2. History - Prohibition

    For example, in 1921, 414,000 gallons of spirits were seized by the enforcing agents. However, by 1929, this had increased to 11,860,000 gallons. Therefore, at face value, source G shows that prohibition failed. This is due to the fact that from 1921 to 1929, there had been an increase in

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    This was one of the reasons why prohibition failed, because of the high levels of crime public opinion of prohibition was lowered and so people started to vote for politicians that said they would repeal prohibition. This was one of the major factors why prohibition failed.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    It is significant that the people are all of different occupation because the source is implying that receiving and giving bribes has become a part of nearly every American's life. The source is called "The National Gesture" because the source is saying that corruption is the way of the Americans

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    The last part of the sentence is again a common point in the sources, talking about crime which increased. If the people live in a country where violence is part of a daily life, it is unlikely they will want to keep the law that is bringing it and so will want it to end.

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The baby is licking the plate of all the scraps, as she is so hungry. The poster also shows that not everyone is poor. The barman is drawn as a fat German looking man who is very happy with the money he receives.

  1. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

    and he spends the money that is needed for basic needs on alcohol. Both of these sources are propaganda posters against alcoholism and were designed to show the effects alcohol has on a person's family life and how it affects them economically.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    Source C states that another reason for campaigning for prohibition was the low efficiency of workers who were addicted to alcohol. This was mainly supported by the more powerful businessmen and factory owners, who were concerned that their employees were not working as hard as they could.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work