• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Study Sources E & F: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition? The reliability of a source is important to historians and so in order to make a valid point using sources the reliability must be tested. For this reason, I will be looking at the reliability of both sources and by analyzing both I will determine which source is more reliable. Source E is in the form of a letter written in 1932 by John D Rockerfeller Jr. who was from a very recognizable and highly respected wealthy family in America at the time. They had one of the most powerful influences on the United States and had a personal wealth exceeding a cool $1 billion and the person who had the greatest share of this was John D Rockerfeller Jr. and thus making him a very influential business man in America. Due to the high standards and the highly respected status of John D Rockerfeller, source E can be said to be very reliable. ...read more.


'The day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol...'He also believed that alcohol was a vile thing and caused corruption like the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union. There are some aspects of the source which make it a lot less reliable. The fact that it is one persons account makes us question its reliability. Rockerfeller may be exaggerating the failure little especially since he was a huge supporter of Prohibition. This source could in fact be the view of a very narrow group of American Philanthropists where as on the other hand the general public may have had a very different view. Also, the source shows no references to actual facts and shows no figures which weakens Rockerfellers argument because it then shows that his points are more of his opinion and he doesn't specify and go into detail. He only generalises each point. Other sources like source G & H use facts and figures and so there reliability is valued more. ...read more.


Secondly, this source can also be seen to be highly bias, thus making it unreliable. It was a speech, meant to be heard and so bias views would be expected in order to convince people to support it prohibition. It is designed to persuade people and make the do what you want and so the source is can be said to not be very reliable at all. In conclusion, I find that source E is more reliable then F. It was written towards the end of the prohibition era and was not designed to persuade anyone unlike source F. The writer was given the advantage of seeing what was happening during the era and so his argument to me is more reliable and valuable. Source F can only be used to explain how and why prohibition came about and what affected the public's attitude. Source F can show that prohibition was started and the law makers had innocent intentions however source F shows haw badly it failed because it discusses everything that happened during the era and not what was believed to happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    These two sources were both produced before the Prohibition was introduced. They are pieces of propaganda to try and win support for Prohibition to be introduced. Therefore the people that produced these two sources must have been confident that prohibition would have a good effect on their nation and confident that it would succeed.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Also the amount of drunks is alarming and as I have said before, people want to live in a safe country, but because this law has been enforced, more people are breaking it. Source I and J show the corruption of the law which was a contributor to the failure of Prohibition.

  1. History - Prohibition

    This source also shows that the total number of arrests made in Philadelphia in 1920 was 20,410, but by 1925, this had increased to 57,703. On the other hand, there was a decrease in the number of those arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct (from 6,097 in 1920, to 5,522

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    15,794 in 1929, however this is not enough information because this could also mean a number of other things such as more stills were being made so more were bound to be found. We need to know how many stills there were all together to be able to tell if the prohibition agents were being successful or not.

  1. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    I don't know who took the photograph, but I do know that it is a primary source, because it was taken during the 1920's. This particular source was taken to show agents for prohibition after a speakeasy. This particular photograph looks very artificial, as it might have been used as

  2. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

    This is very important because it shows that he had the benefit of hindsight, and he could reflect on Prohibition. This is important because we can see that he knows what happened in prohibition. There was no motive for producing an inaccurate source, however, this does depend on whom the letter is being written to.

  1. Prohibition. In this essay I will be looking into prohibition, peoples opinions on it ...

    Source 'C' and 'D' are both for prohibition though they both show this in very different ways. Source 'C' shows it is for prohibition by stating that the 'Poor Mans Club' is well named, as it keeps its members and their families always poor.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    Source C states that another reason for campaigning for prohibition was the low efficiency of workers who were addicted to alcohol. This was mainly supported by the more powerful businessmen and factory owners, who were concerned that their employees were not working as hard as they could.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work