• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Study Sources E & F: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition? The reliability of a source is important to historians and so in order to make a valid point using sources the reliability must be tested. For this reason, I will be looking at the reliability of both sources and by analyzing both I will determine which source is more reliable. Source E is in the form of a letter written in 1932 by John D Rockerfeller Jr. who was from a very recognizable and highly respected wealthy family in America at the time. They had one of the most powerful influences on the United States and had a personal wealth exceeding a cool $1 billion and the person who had the greatest share of this was John D Rockerfeller Jr. and thus making him a very influential business man in America. Due to the high standards and the highly respected status of John D Rockerfeller, source E can be said to be very reliable. ...read more.


'The day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol...'He also believed that alcohol was a vile thing and caused corruption like the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union. There are some aspects of the source which make it a lot less reliable. The fact that it is one persons account makes us question its reliability. Rockerfeller may be exaggerating the failure little especially since he was a huge supporter of Prohibition. This source could in fact be the view of a very narrow group of American Philanthropists where as on the other hand the general public may have had a very different view. Also, the source shows no references to actual facts and shows no figures which weakens Rockerfellers argument because it then shows that his points are more of his opinion and he doesn't specify and go into detail. He only generalises each point. Other sources like source G & H use facts and figures and so there reliability is valued more. ...read more.


Secondly, this source can also be seen to be highly bias, thus making it unreliable. It was a speech, meant to be heard and so bias views would be expected in order to convince people to support it prohibition. It is designed to persuade people and make the do what you want and so the source is can be said to not be very reliable at all. In conclusion, I find that source E is more reliable then F. It was written towards the end of the prohibition era and was not designed to persuade anyone unlike source F. The writer was given the advantage of seeing what was happening during the era and so his argument to me is more reliable and valuable. Source F can only be used to explain how and why prohibition came about and what affected the public's attitude. Source F can show that prohibition was started and the law makers had innocent intentions however source F shows haw badly it failed because it discusses everything that happened during the era and not what was believed to happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Also the amount of drunks is alarming and as I have said before, people want to live in a safe country, but because this law has been enforced, more people are breaking it. Source I and J show the corruption of the law which was a contributor to the failure of Prohibition.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    This means the sources may have been manipulated, as I know police and Prohibition agents were often corrupt, however they would have been manipulated to show the Police as more effective than they actually were and this would not affect the reliability as a sign regarding whether the failure of

  1. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

    Where it is not obeyed it will be enforced." The wording of these two sentences sets off a stern tone and gives the impression that the enforcers will be taking cases extremely seriously, with not one person getting away lightly however we know that in later years this would not

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The child wants to go inside but he is too young and can't. He mother also does not want the child to go in and see his daddy drunk. The sentence that finishes of the title is using the same method as source C.

  1. c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more ...

    However, he realises that in reality, this was not the result and is clearly disappointed. "I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result" Rockefeller talks about the consequences of Prohibition, discussing that "drinking has generally increased", speakeasies have become immensely popular, "a vast

  2. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

    Source E and F both give some important evidence about Prohibition. but I think that source E gives more reliable and accurate evidence. The reason for this is because source E was written in 1932, which means that the writer has experienced Prohibition and knows more about the outcome than the writer of source F.

  1. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    This would have lead to the closure of all the shops. This supports source A as in source A he says ''from 1922 I was unemployed'' and ''then in 1931 everything went bankrupt''. He wouldn't have received any unemployment benefits as these were cut.

  2. History - Prohibition

    The Americans who drank beer would therefore be seen as not being patriotic. Source A says that the most important reason why prohibition was introduced was because of the 'moral fervour inspired by the War to Make the World Safe for Democracy'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work