• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Sources E & F: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition? The reliability of a source is important to historians and so in order to make a valid point using sources the reliability must be tested. For this reason, I will be looking at the reliability of both sources and by analyzing both I will determine which source is more reliable. Source E is in the form of a letter written in 1932 by John D Rockerfeller Jr. who was from a very recognizable and highly respected wealthy family in America at the time. They had one of the most powerful influences on the United States and had a personal wealth exceeding a cool $1 billion and the person who had the greatest share of this was John D Rockerfeller Jr. and thus making him a very influential business man in America. Due to the high standards and the highly respected status of John D Rockerfeller, source E can be said to be very reliable. ...read more.

Middle

'The day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol...'He also believed that alcohol was a vile thing and caused corruption like the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union. There are some aspects of the source which make it a lot less reliable. The fact that it is one persons account makes us question its reliability. Rockerfeller may be exaggerating the failure little especially since he was a huge supporter of Prohibition. This source could in fact be the view of a very narrow group of American Philanthropists where as on the other hand the general public may have had a very different view. Also, the source shows no references to actual facts and shows no figures which weakens Rockerfellers argument because it then shows that his points are more of his opinion and he doesn't specify and go into detail. He only generalises each point. Other sources like source G & H use facts and figures and so there reliability is valued more. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondly, this source can also be seen to be highly bias, thus making it unreliable. It was a speech, meant to be heard and so bias views would be expected in order to convince people to support it prohibition. It is designed to persuade people and make the do what you want and so the source is can be said to not be very reliable at all. In conclusion, I find that source E is more reliable then F. It was written towards the end of the prohibition era and was not designed to persuade anyone unlike source F. The writer was given the advantage of seeing what was happening during the era and so his argument to me is more reliable and valuable. Source F can only be used to explain how and why prohibition came about and what affected the public's attitude. Source F can show that prohibition was started and the law makers had innocent intentions however source F shows haw badly it failed because it discusses everything that happened during the era and not what was believed to happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The support he had for Prohibition at the start leads us to believe that he did not think the failure of prohibition was inevitable as otherwise he would have been against it.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    that all sources support the view that failure of Prohibition was inevitable as some do not support this view. I will firstly discuss the sources, which do support this viewpoint, and consequently their reliability, and then will continue to discuss the sources, which do not support this view, and their reliability.

  1. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    Rockfeller talks about his views before prohibition and how it became impossible to enforce. Although Rockfeller also has a strong opinion he states a lot of useful factual information as well such as "drinking generally increased" and "the speakeasy replaced the saloon".

  2. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about prohibition?

    Kramer, the first prohibition commissioner, in 1920, the same year prohibition was introduced. Kramer speaks about the enforcement of prohibition and how the law would be followed very closely. "The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages.

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The way in which the barman has been drawn would be looked down on as it was after the war with the Germans. The sentence underneath "slaves of the saloons" is very emotive and adds to my hypothesis. Source D is also Pro-Prohibition like source C.

  2. c) Study Sources E and F Which of these two sources is the more ...

    However, he realises that in reality, this was not the result and is clearly disappointed. "I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result" Rockefeller talks about the consequences of Prohibition, discussing that "drinking has generally increased", speakeasies have become immensely popular, "a vast

  1. Which of these two sources is the more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

    "The law says that liquor must not be manufactured. We shall see that it is not". This backs up evidence of people wanting Prohibition to work. This source was written before anyone knew that Prohibition would fail, therefore it does not give us a lot of evidence about Prohibition other then people wanted it to work.

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    This would have lead to the closure of all the shops. This supports source A as in source A he says ''from 1922 I was unemployed'' and ''then in 1931 everything went bankrupt''. He wouldn't have received any unemployment benefits as these were cut.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work