• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Sources E & F: Which of these two sources is more reliable as evidence against prohibition? The reliability of a source is important to historians and so in order to make a valid point using sources the reliability must be tested. For this reason, I will be looking at the reliability of both sources and by analyzing both I will determine which source is more reliable. Source E is in the form of a letter written in 1932 by John D Rockerfeller Jr. who was from a very recognizable and highly respected wealthy family in America at the time. They had one of the most powerful influences on the United States and had a personal wealth exceeding a cool $1 billion and the person who had the greatest share of this was John D Rockerfeller Jr. and thus making him a very influential business man in America. Due to the high standards and the highly respected status of John D Rockerfeller, source E can be said to be very reliable. ...read more.

Middle

'The day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol...'He also believed that alcohol was a vile thing and caused corruption like the Anti-Saloon League and the Women's Christian Temperance Union. There are some aspects of the source which make it a lot less reliable. The fact that it is one persons account makes us question its reliability. Rockerfeller may be exaggerating the failure little especially since he was a huge supporter of Prohibition. This source could in fact be the view of a very narrow group of American Philanthropists where as on the other hand the general public may have had a very different view. Also, the source shows no references to actual facts and shows no figures which weakens Rockerfellers argument because it then shows that his points are more of his opinion and he doesn't specify and go into detail. He only generalises each point. Other sources like source G & H use facts and figures and so there reliability is valued more. ...read more.

Conclusion

Secondly, this source can also be seen to be highly bias, thus making it unreliable. It was a speech, meant to be heard and so bias views would be expected in order to convince people to support it prohibition. It is designed to persuade people and make the do what you want and so the source is can be said to not be very reliable at all. In conclusion, I find that source E is more reliable then F. It was written towards the end of the prohibition era and was not designed to persuade anyone unlike source F. The writer was given the advantage of seeing what was happening during the era and so his argument to me is more reliable and valuable. Source F can only be used to explain how and why prohibition came about and what affected the public's attitude. Source F can show that prohibition was started and the law makers had innocent intentions however source F shows haw badly it failed because it discusses everything that happened during the era and not what was believed to happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    Very little of this illegal alcohol was captured by the authorities, because many of these crimes were carried out by gangsters, like Al Capone. He was one of the main, most successful, and most dangerous gangster during prohibition. If the government had stricter defence forces along the coastline, a lot

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This point is made adamant throughout the sources and was probably, along with the failure of the law to uphold it, one of the greatest contributors to the failure. Source F is from the start of Prohibition and so does not help see if the failure of Prohibition was inevitable.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Source G at face value shows the number of arrests for drinking offences in Philadelphia in a period of 5 years from 1920-1925. It contridicts the other source by not being a pictorial source and being a statistical source which sometimes can only relate to historains generalise or the

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    Although one person's trousers are small they are not ripped and ragged, but in source A the author claims that everyone wears ripped and ragged clothes.

  1. History - Prohibition

    Source C shows a happy bar tender/ owner because a man is giving him a bag of money entitled 'weeks wages'. In the bottom right hand corner of the poster, a woman and her baby are sitting at a table.

  2. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    This was very different from before prohibition was passed; it clearly shows that prohibition had a massive effect on the law enforcers. Before prohibition was passed, law enforcers had massive amounts of respect from everybody, and where classed as a force not to be reckoned with.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    In addition to this, the source shows the activities of Federal Government agents enforcing Prohibition. My own knowledge tells me that Prohibition officers were very often corrupt by the criminals themselves, and therefore these statistics could be manipulated to present the agents as more effective at enforcing Prohibition than they actually are.

  2. How useful is Source A as evidence for studying the spread of prohibition in ...

    Source E, the drawing from the 1960's is also what a raid on a speakeasy is supposed to look like, but is an action shot, opposed to a staged shot in the previous source. This however, was done 40 years after the photograph, and although does not have the credit

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work