Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

Authors Avatar

Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

Collectivisation of Agriculture and Upheaval

During the Great Depression elsewhere, there was no dearth of government spending in the Soviet Union. The Soviet government was pursuing a planned growth of basic manufacturing - for the sake of industry rather than public consumption. It was a "command economy," without unemployment and with as much wealth invested in economic growth as the government could muster. Soviet manufacturing was not advancing in productivity, but by 1935 in volume Soviet manufacturing was more than five times what it had been in 1913, and in percentage of the world's share in manufacturing the Soviet Union had surpassed France, Great Britain and Germany. The United States had a 33 percent share of the world's manufacturing, Russia had 13 percent, and Germany was third at 11 percent.

During the Depression, unemployment in capitalist nations enabled the Soviet Union to import thousands of engineers. And others came, running from unemployment and eager to help build socialism. Not receiving wages high enough to consume much of anything except subsistence food, building socialism had to be an incentive too for Soviet citizens. And they were told that they were sacrificing for the Revolution and for the future.

Meanwhile, the so-called class war in agriculture during the late twenties had extended into the thirties. The rationing of food in cities was combined with a gigantic police operation to collectivise agriculture. All over the Soviet Union, peasants resisted collectivisation. They burned their crops, destroyed their tools and their livestock. - which people in cities saw as criminal sabotage. In places, peasant resistance became uprisings that were crushed by forces sent by Moscow. Police and army units surrounded rebellious peasant communities, burned homes and shot into crowds. A million peasants are believed to have died in 1932. By 1933 the Soviet Union had lost forty-five percent of its cattle, two-thirds of its sheep and goats and half its horses. And 1933 was a year of famine, the worst areas of the famine being the grain producing regions in the Ukraine and the southern Urals. Starving people invaded cities, banging on doors and rummaging through garbage cans. And while peasants and their children were dying of starvation, the government was exporting millions of tons of grain to earn foreign currency for industrialisation.

An estimated three million peasant households had been expropriated. According to Soviet statistics, the number of so-called rich peasants - the Kulaks - had dropped from 5.5 million to 150,000. The homes, barns, land and tools of rebellious peasants had been turned over to the new collective farms. Trainloads of peasants, including children and old people, had been transported to remote areas, some to labour camps or to colonies in Russia's far north or in Siberia. Arrested peasants made up new labour battalions that worked at building railways, cutting timber and building the canal between the White and Baltic seas. The Soviet prison system, which had been founded for re-education, was developing into slave labour camps.

The inhumanity of force against the peasants increased tensions among the Bolsheviks, and it increased Bolshevik fears of those opposed to revolution. More intellectuals stood trial in 1930, and more Mensheviks were persecuted in 1931. That year Stalin spoke of his programs in terms of the need to protect the Revolution against its enemies. "We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries," he said. "We must catch up in ten years, or they will crush us."

Extending the battle to the home front, there were to be no more diverse schools of thought. Supervision of literature had begun, and Stalin himself intervened in the studies of philosophy and history. Ideological battle erupted in the Comintern. Lenin's approval of Communists working with reformers was reversed. Communist parties outside the Soviet Union pulled their membership out of reformist unions and other organisations and began organising alone, hoping to benefit from increased visibly and by putting themselves at the forefront of the assault against capitalism. Bukharin and his followers, past supporters of peasant free enterprise, were persecuted. And Stalin's wife committed suicide with the pistol she had been given for her self-protection.

Calm returned to countryside in 1933. A good harvest that year brought relief to the nation and the Bolsheviks. With Hitler in power and winning adulation from the German public, the Bolsheviks decided to bolster adulation for their regime. And it worked. The dead had been buried, dissident peasants were out-of-sight in distant work camps, and in the cities the persecuted remained a small minority. While many people in the United States were feeling despair, many people in the Soviet Union had a sense of direction. They believed they were building a new society. Foreigners noted that workers were putting pictures of Bolsheviks on their walls - pictures of Stalin, Molotov, Kalinin and Kirov. And peasants on collectives had icon-like pictures of Lenin and Stalin in their homes. How much all of this was adulation and how much was a demonstration of conformity is hard to measure, but foreign observers did see a good amount of the old Russian tradition of adulation for those in power.

A new breed of Soviet citizen was developing. Young adults were grateful for the opportunities that had been denied their poor parents - opportunities at occupations such as teaching, medicine and engineering. For many of them Stalin was a symbol of unity, and they believed that unity was necessary in the face of a world hostile to their nation.

During 1934, H.G. Wells came again to the Soviet Union, and he was impressed by what he saw. He visited Stalin, and, amid all that they talked about, Stalin pointed out that Wells was proceeding from the assumption that all people are good. Stalin reflected on the struggles he had experienced and gave Wells a rationale for his brutality. "But," he said, " I do not forget that many people are evil."

Other well-meaning and intelligent people visited the Soviet Union, among them the American singer, actor and human rights advocate Paul Robeson. In an interview that he gave in Moscow to a correspondent for New York's Daily Worker, Robeson is reported as saying that wherever he turned in Moscow he had found happiness and "bounding life, the feeling of safety and abundance of freedom." Commenting on recent trials and executions, Robeson said that from what he had seen of the workings of the Soviet Government, "anybody who lifts his hand against it ought to be shot!"  

The reporter was Vern Smith. His report can be found in Paul Robeson Speaks, edited by Philip S. Foner (New York, 1978).

Hopes for Liberalization and the Murder of Kirov

In 1934, the Soviet Union was still devoted to industrialising, trying to catch up, as Stalin had put it, rather than let the other powers overwhelm them - Stalin's version of the Darwinian struggle, vaguely similar to Hitler's. By 1934, the Soviet Union had completed its collectivisation of agriculture, and it left an unpleasant aftertaste within the Soviet Union's Communist Party. Many Party members believed that it was time for reconciliation and a move closer to the communist ideal of happiness and liberty for all. The Communist Party was still supposed to be a family of comrades. And still in the Party, or readmitted to the Party, were some of Stalin's former opponents, the so-called Rightists, Bukharin, Tomsky and Rykov, and the so-called Leftists, the humbled Zinoviev, Kamenev and others of the old "United Opposition." Leon Trotsky, however, was in exile in Turkey, an outcast, trying to organise an alternative to Stalinist rule.

Join now!

A part of the Marxist ideal was democracy, and Communist Party members still believed in democracy within the Party. One such Party member was Sergei Kirov, who also sat on the politburo and was leader of the Communist Party in Leningrad. It was easier for someone at the top to believe that democracy was functioning than it was for those who still looked with favour upon a dissenter or outcast like Trotsky, and Kirov was one such believer. With other Party members he also believed in the Leninist position that the Party should debate and then close ranks. Kirov was ...

This is a preview of the whole essay