• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 3: The New Deal was not a complete success. Explain how far you agree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3: "The New Deal was not a complete success". Explain how far you agree with this statement. Due to the Wall Street Crash in 1933 the New Deal was introduced. The New Deal helped the unemployment problem but did not solve it. The New Deal stopped things from getting any worse in the short term, however in the long term only World War two solved the unemployment crisis. Some historians believe that the New Deal was partly a success and partly a failure. In the opinion I think that the New Deal was a success. The New Deal had aimed to provide relief through the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA), this aimed to provide direct cash to the needy. $500 million has been given to states to help the starving and homeless people. The money was also used for employment schemes, nursing schools (so parents could go out during the day to find a job), soup kitchens, and blankets. The FERA was up to some point a success, for this aim many things had to be provided, if the government had stopped providing money this aim wouldn't be a success. ...read more.

Middle

It was used to buy materials and employ millions of skilled workers to build schools, housing, hospitals, bridges, courtrooms and dams. The PWA also built ten ships and 50 airports. But this solution was only short-term. The New Deal laws clearly dealt with the problem of poverty among black people and the poorest sector. The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) gave the government power to control the prices. They paid farmers to produce less and destroy some of the food they had already produced. They hoped that food prices would rise because there were short supplies. The idea worked-between 1933 and 1939, farmers' incomes doubled. However, the government was heavily criticized for this idea, the government was destroying food and forcing up prices to help farmers at a time when millions in the city were starving. The New Deal did a lot to help agriculture, however did have some problem it helped large firms the most and the problems of 'dustbowl' continued. Projects such as the Tennessee valley authority (TVA) ...read more.

Conclusion

The judges in the court were conservative and did not like the way the New Deal allowed the government to become so involved in the economy. The judges found the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) unlawful. Roosevelt did not want the judges to dismantle the whole New Deal. A After he was re elected in 1936 he tried to change the judges so the court was pro New Deal. This did not work, but the court realized they could not change the New Deal. In conclusion I think that The New Deal was a success as the Federal Government got involved for the first time. As well as this acts such as the WPA and the CWA provided relief for the economy. The Banking Act and the Securities Act helped solve financial problems and the AAA helped agriculture. The NRA improved working conditions in industry and women became high achievers. However there were some failures the problem of 'dustbowl' continued, unemployment did not go away, most New Deal laws were designed to help women rather than men and the New Deal had a lot of opposition. It was the war that finally solved the problem of unemployment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. What is understood by the term the

    education the benefits of which are an equal opportunity to earn and move socially on the same standing as others. This has however, not been the case for many minority groups in the US, particularly African Americans, up until the 1960's with the advent of the Civil Rights Acts, African

  2. How far did the role and status of women change 1914 and 1928

    in this photograph we can only see one black person and we are also limited as we can not see outside of the photograph. However the advantages of this source are that, we can see the whites behind the black student are angry and hostile.

  1. The USA 1941 - 80 : The Divided Union.

    * The local civil rights group helped to set up the MIA ( Montgomery Improvement Association) * The MIA decided to put economic pressure on the Bus Company to force them to desegregate the buses. * President of the MIA was the local Minister Martin Luther King.he was aided by Rev.

  2. How far had the Constituent Assembly changed France by October 1791?

    Only seven bishops and about half the clergy agreed: the rest, mainly in western France, refused and became 'non-jurors': a religious war had begun and the non-jurors became the spearhead and organisation of the counter-revolution while anti-clericalism grew amongst those who supported the Revolution.

  1. Segregation Sources Question

    He could have been motivated by fame, wealth or morality. Patrick Humphries suggests that fame and wealth were not major motivations of Dylan but "in the back of his mind there was an element of that."

  2. Discrimination Sources Question

    Although, when this source is examined thoroughly we see at the end of this source she acknowledges the decent white people when say says, " Just then a white man sat down beside me and put his arm around me and patted my shoulder.

  1. Discrimination Sources Question

    How valid is the portrayal in the selected extracts? (a) A lot of the views expressed in H are enforced by I+J. A man in H says, 'If you aren't better than a nigger, who arte you better than?' Source I enforces this calling them 'undesirable neighbours'.

  2. Sharpeville Sources Question

    prove that the impression given by source A of the situation in Sharpeville on the morning of 21st March is correct. Both sources agree that the scene is peaceful on both parts (crowd & police) and that the police and the crowd are getting along peacefully without violence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work