• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 3: The New Deal was not a complete success. Explain how far you agree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...


Question 3: "The New Deal was not a complete success". Explain how far you agree with this statement. Due to the Wall Street Crash in 1933 the New Deal was introduced. The New Deal helped the unemployment problem but did not solve it. The New Deal stopped things from getting any worse in the short term, however in the long term only World War two solved the unemployment crisis. Some historians believe that the New Deal was partly a success and partly a failure. In the opinion I think that the New Deal was a success. The New Deal had aimed to provide relief through the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA), this aimed to provide direct cash to the needy. $500 million has been given to states to help the starving and homeless people. The money was also used for employment schemes, nursing schools (so parents could go out during the day to find a job), soup kitchens, and blankets. The FERA was up to some point a success, for this aim many things had to be provided, if the government had stopped providing money this aim wouldn't be a success. ...read more.


It was used to buy materials and employ millions of skilled workers to build schools, housing, hospitals, bridges, courtrooms and dams. The PWA also built ten ships and 50 airports. But this solution was only short-term. The New Deal laws clearly dealt with the problem of poverty among black people and the poorest sector. The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) gave the government power to control the prices. They paid farmers to produce less and destroy some of the food they had already produced. They hoped that food prices would rise because there were short supplies. The idea worked-between 1933 and 1939, farmers' incomes doubled. However, the government was heavily criticized for this idea, the government was destroying food and forcing up prices to help farmers at a time when millions in the city were starving. The New Deal did a lot to help agriculture, however did have some problem it helped large firms the most and the problems of 'dustbowl' continued. Projects such as the Tennessee valley authority (TVA) ...read more.


The judges in the court were conservative and did not like the way the New Deal allowed the government to become so involved in the economy. The judges found the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) unlawful. Roosevelt did not want the judges to dismantle the whole New Deal. A After he was re elected in 1936 he tried to change the judges so the court was pro New Deal. This did not work, but the court realized they could not change the New Deal. In conclusion I think that The New Deal was a success as the Federal Government got involved for the first time. As well as this acts such as the WPA and the CWA provided relief for the economy. The Banking Act and the Securities Act helped solve financial problems and the AAA helped agriculture. The NRA improved working conditions in industry and women became high achievers. However there were some failures the problem of 'dustbowl' continued, unemployment did not go away, most New Deal laws were designed to help women rather than men and the New Deal had a lot of opposition. It was the war that finally solved the problem of unemployment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. What is understood by the term the

    education the benefits of which are an equal opportunity to earn and move socially on the same standing as others. This has however, not been the case for many minority groups in the US, particularly African Americans, up until the 1960's with the advent of the Civil Rights Acts, African

  2. How far did the role and status of women change 1914 and 1928

    Men were ordered to join up. This meant there was no need for women to do the jobs that the men were leaving. Women became conductors on buses and trams, very few were allowed to become drivers because the driver pay was higher than the conductors were.

  1. Sharpeville Sources Question

    The police opened fire on the crowd and continued to shoot as they turned and ran in fear, it was a massacre". This statement was made after the events in Sharpeville where police opened fire and killed approximately 67. In 1988, a book published in South Africa quoted "The police

  2. The USA 1941 - 80 : The Divided Union.

    Woodstock in New York State.It became a protest agaisnt the war in Vietnam * The Nixon years also saw the emergence of the Womens' Liberation Movement (and between 1966 and 1972 an 80% rise in the number of divorces in the USA).

  1. How far had the Constituent Assembly changed France by October 1791?

    each administered by a council of 36 members elected by the 'active citizens'. Each department was divided into communes: there were over 40,000 communes, each a natural entity, run by an elected council and mayor. Public office was made open by election or appointment to men of talent and a uniform system imposed which has survived to this day.

  2. Discrimination Sources Question

    Although, because the New York Times is a northern liberal newspaper it would be written mainly for northern white people who were sympathetic to desegregation. This suggests that there may be an element of bias in this source and that the emotive language and use of words such as "hysteria,

  1. Segregation Sources Question

    It is fairly reliable because she does not seem to have forgotten any details; this is backed up by other accounts of the incident. There doesn't seem to be a feeling of malice or hate in her testimony. She also tells of both the racists and the NAACP supporters present, unlike the New York Times.

  2. Discrimination Sources Question

    Question 3 Examine Sources G, H, I and J: (a) How does each source help to deepen our understanding of White American attitudes to Negroes at different times in the 20th century? (b) Source H is an extract from 'Mississippi Burning', a film made in 1989.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work