• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question- study representatives 1 & 2. They are both representations of the way in which people in the USA reacted to the Vietnam War. How far do these representations differ?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History coursework: Representation 1 evidently was produced to discourage people from joining the army. It exudes a death -like demeanour, as a skeleton is being portrayed as Uncle Sam, it mimics the iconic original poster of Uncle Sam, albeit in an antagonistic manner. The very statement "I want you" seems like an unpleasant and unjustified demand and depicts that joining the Vietnam War would lead to a futile death. It portrays the eventual inevitability of dying if you take part in the Vietnam War. It seems obvious from this poster that at the stage when the poster was created that many Americans no longer supported the war and as the above writing states were trying to "unsell the war". ...read more.

Middle

I think the makers behind the poster chose this form as it is visually striking and brings the message across more effectively than a leaflet of facts. I think the author of representation 2, John Simpkin wrote his investigation as paragraphed analysis as it was the simplest way to list information and statistics. The representations were obviously created for contrasting reasons, one to disclose information, the other to discourage further people from participating in the War. Overall I think the sources are more different than similar. Although both noticeably give off negative depictions of the US army's role in the Vietnam War, which is interpreted through the quotes such as "US armed forces were also found guilty of torturing captured prisoners and innocent civilians" and the decaying skeleton in representation 1 I think the similarities end there. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source 2 was written when the Vietnam War had ended and the whole incident and its aftermath could be analysed. However I think the sole difference of each is the intent of each source. One is a completely unbiased piece of written literature reporting reactions to the Vietnam War, the other an invitation to a seemingly unavoidable demise, illustrating the horrors of the Vietnam War. By Eva Mathew Question- study representatives 1 & 2. They are both representations of the way in which people in the USA reacted to the Vietnam War. How far do these representations differ? How to get full marks: Analyse the sources and identifies a range of similarities and differences in representations. Uses precisely selected detail from the provided representations to support the explanation and makes a judgement about extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam war, representation work. In this essay I will evaluate the content, accuracy ...

    Similarities of the 2nd and 3rd source include the fact that they share the same creators and depict the same opinion - despite the fact that they were made in different years (1971&1972). The statements "I want out" and "I want you, for the US army" complete with thought-evoking pictures

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    by October 1969 support for the war had plummeted - just a month earlier convictions for the My Lai Massacre had begun. The poll is not specific enough to determine whether or not the source supports Source M even at a fundamental level, all though the dates of popularity change

  1. How was the opposition to the Vietnam war protrayed in contemporary literature, film and ...

    They don't even care about their own people. I know this because the American leaders refer to the soldiers as a number. This is very degrading in my opinion. Lastly, the poem America reveals the reaction of the American public towards the war, as it says.

  2. Vietnam 2

    In President Johnson's speech he says that they have a promise to keep. The promise was "the independence of the South Vietnam the freedom of the people of South Vietnam to guide their country own country in their own way".

  1. American reactions to the vietnam war

    However this representation is mostly inaccurate, mainly because the poster is someone's opinion, it lacks factual information, and this severely limits its accuracy. Another factor that contributes to its inaccuracy is that the message given is very simple and blunt, as it lacks any significant detail.

  2. Vietnam Coursework: Question One

    The domino effect was a huge threat to America's policy of containment. During the 1950s America became deeply concerned that Vietnam would be the next country to fall and the domino effect would escalate. The source however is limited due to the fact that it was speech delivered after President Johnson had been re-elected in 1964.

  1. Analyse and evaluate three representations of history: Protests against the Vietnam War

    Wanting to voice anti-war sentiment to the nation, provoke debate and criticise people?s views the representation is made one-sided, not telling the whole story and not being as comprehensive as representation 1 or even 2.

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    The first films released about the Vietnam War were all very pro-war. This was influenced by the pro war feelings at the start of the war which were shared by many Americans. One of the main films of this time was a movie called the "Green Berets" in 1968, starring

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work