• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution inevitbale?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question the nature of Russian society in the early 20th Century. Was a revolution inevitbale? Throughout the early 20th Century there seem to be many events which happened in Russia which built up tension and put pressure on the Tsarist Government. I personally think that the Russian revolution in 1917 was inevitable, no country could go on in the state that Russia was in without a revolution at some point. The revolution was going to happen sooner or later, and WW1 was the final straw, it sped up the reactions of people and made them realise that a revolution was needed due to the incompetence of the Tsar. Throughout this essay I shall look at events and aspects of Russia which I think helped cause the Russian Revolution. The revolution was the culmination of a long period of repression and unrest. From the time of Peter I (Peter the Great), the Tsardom increasingly became an autocratic bureaucracy that imposed its will on the people by force, with wanton disregard for human life and liberty. The road to the Russian revolution began with the end of the Crimean war in 1855, it was one of the many disastrousn military defeats that Russia was to see in her lifetime. Poor roads, antiquated weapons and low morale helped Russia lose, and defeat proved to the Tsarist autocracy that Russia was very far behind the rest of Europe. ...read more.

Middle

Teased by half-hearted reforms, dissatisfied peasants, intellectuals, professionals and even some liberal gentry sought greater freedom through revolutionary movements to overthrow the Tsarist Government. A wide variety of political groups secretly developed in Russia during the 19th Century and Alexander II was assassinated on 1st March 1881. This already shows political discontent and an unstable society in Russia. When Alexander III came to power he made the monarchy very unpoular with the development of "Russification". People were discriminated against if their mother tongue was not russian, and Jews faced many social, political and economic restrictions. In 1905, Nicholas II decided to share his power with the people. He set up the first of four Dumas. This can be seen as an indication that in the relatively near future there could be a major reform. By setting up the Duma the Tsar had allowed people to believe that change for the good was coming, however when there was no change people started to become disenchanted. The Tsar's main reason for setting up the Duma was to relieve short term political pressure that had been built up, this showed he was not committed to sharing long term political power with his people. As soon as the political tension had settled the Tsar dissolved the Duma. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people suspected the Tsaritsa felt sympathetic towards the German enemy and the influence of Rasputen was resented. Urban food shortages were the immediate cause of the February revolution, and Nicholas II who was away at the front was unconcious of serious people unrest. Throughout his time at the front lines a revolution began, known as the February Revolution,1917. Demonstrations began calling for the Duma, as well as higher wages. A 1/4m people were now on strike and by the 26th February, 40 demonstrators had been killed. This caused absolute mayhem. The Tsars' immediate response was to stop riots and strikes but by this time the corrossion of the Tsarist system was complete, many realised that he had to go, including senior generals and ministers. He finally abdicated in 1917. In conclusion, I believe that the Russian revolution was going to happen sooner or later, it was inevitable. Many things thoughout the early 20th Century caused lack of faith with the Tsar and his government. Maybe if WWI had not occurred then I think that the revolution may have been delayed, but in all honesty I don't think that Russia could have gone on for much longer with the state it was in. She desperately needed economic, political and social reforms to help her survive, and that was not going to happen because the Tsarist government would not learn how to share power. ?? ?? ?? ?? Michelle Chasey ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    The mutinies are absolutely crucial to the Tsar falling from power. The only reason the Tsar had survived the 1905 revolution was because the army were there to crush and revolutionaries. After such crushing and humiliating defeats in the Russo-Japanese war and World War One, the Russian army had had enough.

  2. The Russian Revolution 1917

    were not very good at propaganda, and they did not choose their policies in a way that the Russian public found attractive. A lot of people would claim that it was in fact the failure of other parties which allowed the Bolsheviks to gain support - perhaps if one of

  1. Why was there a German revolution in 1918 and how far had it gone ...

    By the autumn of 1917, Germany faced a growing economic and military crisis and the people were close to starvation. However, Russia signed a treaty of Brest-Litovsk where Germany made many territorial gains from Russia. Even though Germany was now only fighting on one front, fresh enemy troops weakened her allies who eventually sought peace.

  2. The Russian Revolution - 3 Essays

    Many of the people had to wait in bread queues to get their food. One of the problems was that there was a lot more food, but it was not getting transported to the cities and towns.

  1. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    They were difficult and expensive to build in hilly areas, and they were extremely slow. In the end, they were superseded by another new, revolutionary form of transport: the railways. The impact of the railways on the 19th century Britain was so great that the period of time was known as the "Railway Age".

  2. Why Was Russia Considered Backward in the Early 19th Century?

    In the past Britain had worked on a similar system to Tsarist Russia as the monarch had the most power, but Britain had moved on since those times. It could be considered backward to leave all power and responsible to one person that was not even chosen to be the tsar as other countries were abandoning this system.

  1. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    In autumn 1916, the Tsar appointed the most inept Minister in Interior ever. Potropopov was corrupt and crazy, appointed only as a friend of Rasputin's. It was no wonder that Russia was completely incompetent. As the industrial revolution took off in Russia, the government was very eager to see its development flourish.

  2. Analyse how far WW1 caused the Russian Revolution.

    (Ben Walsh 107) The Dumas were unsuccessful as it was heavily restricted, and with the rise of Rasputin in the court. Rasputin was infamous for being a drunkard and a womanizer. The image of the Tsar autocracy was being tainted with rumors of an affair between the Tsarina and Rasputin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work