• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Recognition for civil rights

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Recognition for civil rights reached its peak in the 1950s and 60s for black people in the United States, and this was predominantly due to two key activist leaders. Martin Luther King. Jr and Malcolm X were both effective and groundbreaking in their efforts for civil rights and equality, albeit in distinctly different ways. This essay shall determine the roles they played within their movements, and will attempt to identify similarities as well as differences in their ideas and methods. I will also assess the significance of their achievements, and decide how they contrast or compare to one another. To evaluate the two leaders' roles in comparison to each other, it is essential to first identify their characters and backgrounds. Martin Luther King was raised by a Baptist minister in Atlanta, and earned a PhD in Philosophy before accepting a call to preach in Montgomery. The influences for his eventual beliefs on resistance were based on the Gospels, the writings of Henry David Thoreau and the example of Mahatma Gandhi in India. Colaiaco describes the genius of King as having "the ability to perceive that there is something noble in humanity that, once tapped, has the power to transform the world." ...read more.

Middle

King's March on Washington in 1963, although extremely moving and influential, was accused by Malcolm X as a sell-out to the racist system. Malcolm's denunciation reflected many black militants' sentiments. It could be argued, however, that Martin Luther King's was able to have such an influence in his lifetime precisely because the white liberals were able to accept him (at least, until his far-reaching critique of America's foreign policy in the last part of his life). His goals and methods were not radical. As King explained in his 'Letter to Birmingham', he represented a middle course between two opposing groups in the black community. There were those who had resigned themselves to segregation for dignity, or for the minority of blacks, to keep their middle-class status, and there were those who were (according to King) the promoters of "bitterness and hatred" who came "perilously close to advocating violence." King always regarded the doctrine of black supremacy as evil as the doctrine of white supremacy. He dismissed separatism as a "nihilistic philosophy", but although Malcolm X's principles were often based on violence and hyperbole, he did have two main positive effects on the civil rights movement. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is valid to say that both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were pioneers concerning civil rights in the 1950s and 60s. During their careers, they upheld different ideologies and methods of gaining freedom and equality for black people. It could be argued that, as Martin Luther King was the more distinguished and "acceptable" of the two to generic America (he did win the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964), he would have had a much broader impact across the country. Resistance through love and understanding was a powerful way of increasing integration between blacks and whites. It was Malcolm X who pointed out, in the North, the problems that integration was ignoring. It was through this mutual link that real change began to take effect for civil rights. 1 J. Colaicao, Martin Luther King Jr.: Apostle of Militant Non-violence 2 Malcolm X, with Alex Haley, The Autobiography of Malcolm X 3 Martin Luther King, Jr. 1958 4 National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People 5 Maldwyn A. Jones, The Limits of Liberty 6 Student Non-violent Co-ordinating Committee 7 Thomas Savell, Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality? ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare the Roles Played by Martin Luther King and Malcolm X 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. One problem leading to Blacks fighting for their Civil Rights was the unjust Jim ...

    These views where starting to get to a boiling point for Black African Americans and when they came back from a war experience better treated than in there own country it started to fry fury in the heads of Black Americans and this sequentially led to Black African Americans to expect and demand change.

  2. Political Philosophy of Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X - a comparison.

    that he became one of the major supporter´┐Żs and spokesman of Elijah Mohammed. Through NoI Malcolm had found a new sense of worth, giving speeches. People understood him and could identify with him, because he had been in the same situation as they did.

  1. What impact did Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam have on the civil ...

    burned to death by mobs of White vigilantes, frequently in front of thousands of spectators, many of whom would take pieces of the dead person's body as souvenirs to help remember the spectacular event"4. The philosophy of the Nation of Islam exposed the atrocities that Caucasians had committed against African-Americans

  2. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King: Compared and Contrasted.

    This is drastically different from Martin Luther King's "I have a Dream" or "I have been to the Mountain Top" speeches. This clearly shows both of their mentalities, Malcolm X clearly believed in violent self-defence and decisive action whereas Martin Luther King's speeches had a very Christian approach about them

  1. Why was the use of Non-Violence Protest effective during King Jr.’s Campaign for improved ...

    meanness of Birmingham, we must confront her with our kindness and our goodness and our determination to be non-violent. As difficult as it is, we must meet hate with love." From all of this, Martin Luther King emerged as a true leader.

  2. Blacks and their civil rights

    King won a Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 for his work to end racial discrimination through non-violent methods. This showed the public that he was successful and a good person, giving him even more support. One of his main criticisms was that there was not enough emphasis on social and economic changes, for example segregated communities.

  1. Civil Rights in America 50s & 60s

    Not only did the huge processions of travelling protestors attract attention from the mass media but the bus operator stood to enter bankruptcy as the vast majority of its users were from the black community. The bus boycott situation continued for over a year as people battled with the question of should segregation exist on public transport?

  2. Martin and Malcolm: Two Voices for Justice

    This was the result of the same black experience of suffering and struggle in America that had defined their faith commitments. Therefore, each of their theologies can be seen as different religious and intellectual responses of blacks to their environment as they searched for meaning in a nation they did

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work