• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...


HISTORY COURSEWORK- THE REICHSTAG FIRE DEVANSHI SODHANI Q1. What can you learn about the events surrounding the Reich Stag Fire from source A? Ans. Source A is an extract from Seftan Delmer's article that was written by him on 27th February 1933 which was the day when the German parliament or the Reich Stag was in flames. This source describes the events surrounding the Reich Stag fire which broke out at 9.45pm in the Assembly Hall of the building. It also states that the fire was under control by 12.30am. After the fire started, the leaders of the Nazi party walked in. they were- Adolf Hitler, Dr.Goebbels and Captain Goering. Delmer has a balanced opinion about the cause of the fire. According to the source, this arson was carried out by a Communist Dutchman called Marius Van der Lubbe. The source also suggests that it could have been the work of the Nazis who wanted to completely destroy Communism and take over as the leaders of Germany by winning the elections that were supposed to be held on 8th March 1933. Delmer also describes the events that followed the fire. Hitler walked into the Reich Stag after the fire had broken out and declared, "This is the God- given signal! If this fire, as I believe, turns out to be the handiwork of Communists then there is nothing that shall stop us now crushing out thus murder pest with an iron fist." He had a very determined expression on his face and his eyes were bulging out of his head. Captain Goering who was the propaganda chief of the Nazi party said that some communist deputies were present in the Reich Stag twenty minutes before fire and that they had managed to get hold of one of them. Delmer writes that Hitler also interacted with him saying "God grant, that this is the work of the Communists. ...read more.


This leaflet was published just before the elections that were to be held on 5th March 1933. The headline says "THE REICHSTAG IN FLAMES" in capital letters because it was the most recent evidence that the Nazis had to gain support of the German people. At that time, Hitler's main opposition was coming from the communist party and he wanted to completely crush them. This leaflet is thus targeted at the communists. The line, "Farmers' houses burnt down" refers to the roots of communism in Russia where according to the collectivization rule all farmers were made to work till they met the target produce set by the Russian government. If they failed to do so, their houses were burnt down and their land and animals were taken away. The Nazis used this against communists to get the support of the farmers who at first didn't support the Nazis when the party had been founded in 1919. Along with the communists, the Nazis also cried foul against the Social Democrats who supported communism. They felt that the fate of Germans would be like the Russians who were shot if they did not follow the policies of the government. The leaflet also states that all the Germans must join the outcry against communism otherwise the whole country would suffer under the communists. This source supports the view firmly that after the Reich Stag Fire, the Nazis were able to eliminate the communist opposition to a great extent because finally the Nazis won the election after defeating the communist party. Q4. Study source G. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer. Ans. Many observers reacted to the burning of the Reich Stag building on 27th September 1933. Some of them blamed the Communists for causing the fire and some thought that it was the handiwork of the Nazis so as to gain the support of the German people. ...read more.


The statement made by Halder is at the time when he was not the commander- in- chief and was attending a luncheon on Hitler's birthday. He said, "I heard with my own ears when Goering interrupted the conversation and shouted: The only one who knows about the Reichstag is I, because I set it on fire!" Contrary to this, in the second statement made by Goering himself at the Nuremburg trials of 1946, he states that he did not cause the Reichstag fire and that he would have never used the inconvenient way of setting the Reichstag on fire to blame the communists. The statement made by Halder is not completely reliable since he may have revenge in mind after he was removed from his post by Hitler during the war in 1942. The statement made by Goering too is not completely reliable since he was the main accused and he was trying to defend himself till his trial. Therefore, source J cannot be used to judge if Goering was telling lies. Source K is a description of "the brown book on the Reichstag fire and Hitler's terror." The book was published in 1933 in Switzerland under the editorship of Willi Munzenberg. The book had German �migr�s proving the fact that the Reichstag fire was caused by the Nazis themselves in a secret operation that was run by the SA leader Herman Goering. However, the author of this book was the leader of the German communist party which was the main opponent of the Nazi party. Therefore, it can be said that he would always write something blaming the Nazis. In the same source, it is written that everyone abroad was convinced that the Nazis had set fire to the Reichstag building. Although the source suggests this, there are no statistics to prove it and thus it cannot be used as an evidence to show that Goering was telling lies. After reading both the sources, there isn't enough evidence to show that Goering was telling lies and therefore in conclusion I would say that there is no solid proof that Goering was lying. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent did the Vikings deserve this bad press? How would you characterise ...

    Sawyer, Kings and Vikings, 4) Scandinavian art and jewellery featuring animal motifs and intricate patterning were also introduced into European life. (James Graham Campbell and Dafydd Kidd, The Vikings (London: Book Club Associates, 1980) 131-179) The Vikings were also responsible for the extension of the boundaries of Europe.

  2. How far was the monarchy responsible for its own downfall in September 1792? Explain ...

    Malesherbes attributes his failure to stifle the production of banned print to the fact 'people are set on obtaining them at any price. And who? The very people who, given their birth, their faith and their learning, and their zeal for religion, ought to be the first to condemn them'4.

  1. Were contemporaries correct in blaming Hitler for the Reichstag Fire?

    He also says that 'one of the incendiaries' have been arrested (presumably Van der Lubbe at this stage), showing that Goering initially believes more than one person was responsible. We are not told about Hitler's reactions and so do not know from this source whether or not he was involved in the fire.

  2. Hitlers promise of a better future for German people was the most important reason ...

    had to be run by a series of coalition governments, but divisions among the parties were so great that it was difficult to construct a coalition which would last. This system of proportional representation made it easier for communists and the Nazis to get into the Reichstag and for them

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    The overseers' job was nothing easy, they are under pressure of Master John to maximise profits. They did this by bullying the slaves into increasing productivity. The white overseer's mercy on me was indeed extraordinary. I did not feed Samuel during working hours ever again because I still feared he

  2. Nazi Germany

    Unlike the teenagers involved in the "swing" movement the Pirates rebelled against the Nazis giving them serious trouble; they attacked Hitler Youth marching bands, ambushed their patrols, beat them up and conspired against them. In fact, one of their slogans was "Eternal War on the Hitler Youth".

  1. How did Hitler become Chancellor in 1933

    1923 French and Belgian troops marched into industrial Ruhr and began to take what was owed to them in the form of raw materials and goods. The results of the occupation of Ruhr were disastrous for Germany. The Government ordered the workers to go on strike - carry out passive

  2. Conflict between Europeans and Aborigines in Van Diemen's Land

    Lyndall Ryan and Henry Reynolds would fall within the group of historians who could be described as taking the 'black arm-band' view of Australian history. The revisionist stance taken by Windschuttle would seem valuable here as a way of balancing the overall view of the topic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work