• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reichstag Fire Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 2 Source B is written by Van der Lubbe, the ex-communist who says he started the fire, he also says he acted alone. It is not a very reliable source because Van der Lubbe was probably being heavily tortured when he gave this statement and therefore the Nazis could make him say anything they wanted. Despite this it confirms that the Nazi claim that the fire had a communist link although Van der Lubbe was no longer a communist and that the fire was started because of a political motive. The communists had to cause trouble because the workers were currently not uprising due to terror, the communists were the only people who were prepared to fight against the Nazis and therefore it is likely that the source is telling the truth about the kind of person who started the fire. ...read more.

Middle

The statement also says that Van der Lubbe did not mean to hurt anyone just destroyed the main part of a system that he disagreed with. The German general election was on the 28th February and Van der Lubbe started the fire the day before, this perhaps shows that the communists knew that the Nazis were going to get the majority and were willing to go to desperate measures to stop this happening. This source is going to be a little biased in favour of the communists because it was written by an ex-communist so in actual fact when he says he acted alone there could've been others helping that he was protecting. ...read more.

Conclusion

It proves that the two main people in the German party were not present when the fire was started and Goebbel also tells us how shocked he was when he found out and how he refused to believe it until he was informed by furthermore calls. Not only is it an alibi for Goebbel and Hitler but also it is one for Goring and von Papen this also proves that even more of the Nazis were not involved in the fire. When Goebbel hears the news he immediately blames the communists and says that it was a deliberate attempt by them to disrupt the country and cause panic and terror which shows that the communists had been terrorising the country before and so Goebbel is ready to believe that they would start the fire as soon as he is told. By Josh Congdon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    It is convenient that the confession is given so soon after the fire and that the confessor, Karl Ernst had been killed in the "Night of the Long Knives" by the time the book was published. The "Night of the Long Knives" was when Hitler had several SA leaders arrested

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Therefore, if van der Lubbe admitted the blame, the Nazis could use that as an excuse to ban the party. Also, Nazis feared the rise of the communist. The USSR was beginning to expand to the west and east to spread their communist ideas during 1930s.

  1. Holocaust Sources Questions

    a one armed Jew and makes the remark "look, a one armed Jew, twice as useless" The next scene shows us the thoughts of "Amon Goethe" through one of his speeches. In his speech he refers to the extermination of Jews as a "great day" "today is history" In the

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    I will be looking at Sources, D and E, to see how reliable they are even though this is difficult to measure and to see to what extent I agree with the statement of Source D being a more reliable account than Source E.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Another explicit agreement between the sources is how it is inferred that the Nazis blame the Communist party and in particular its extremist followers for the events that transpired on the night of 27th February 1933. This is clear from source C from the title; 'The Red Peril'.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    When there was an emergency in Rome, the emperor and his leading followers had dictatorial powers, much as Hitler did in Germany. If the togas are a reference to that, then this point is neither for nor against the Nazis.

  1. The two sources are extracts that address the issue of the Reichstag Fire that ...

    The source' reliability is also contested by my own knowledge, as van der Lubbe was indeed the person charged with burning the Reichstag fire. There were fears of a Communist led uprising, as it had occurred in Russia, which

  2. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    At the trials Nazis were accused of war crimes and so Diels might have spoken up to take the attention away form the Nazis. There are also many contradictions within the source. For example, Diels reported that Van der Lubbe ran through corridors; Van der Lubbe was handicapped both physically and mentally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work