• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reichstag Fire Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 2 Source B is written by Van der Lubbe, the ex-communist who says he started the fire, he also says he acted alone. It is not a very reliable source because Van der Lubbe was probably being heavily tortured when he gave this statement and therefore the Nazis could make him say anything they wanted. Despite this it confirms that the Nazi claim that the fire had a communist link although Van der Lubbe was no longer a communist and that the fire was started because of a political motive. The communists had to cause trouble because the workers were currently not uprising due to terror, the communists were the only people who were prepared to fight against the Nazis and therefore it is likely that the source is telling the truth about the kind of person who started the fire. ...read more.

Middle

The statement also says that Van der Lubbe did not mean to hurt anyone just destroyed the main part of a system that he disagreed with. The German general election was on the 28th February and Van der Lubbe started the fire the day before, this perhaps shows that the communists knew that the Nazis were going to get the majority and were willing to go to desperate measures to stop this happening. This source is going to be a little biased in favour of the communists because it was written by an ex-communist so in actual fact when he says he acted alone there could've been others helping that he was protecting. ...read more.

Conclusion

It proves that the two main people in the German party were not present when the fire was started and Goebbel also tells us how shocked he was when he found out and how he refused to believe it until he was informed by furthermore calls. Not only is it an alibi for Goebbel and Hitler but also it is one for Goring and von Papen this also proves that even more of the Nazis were not involved in the fire. When Goebbel hears the news he immediately blames the communists and says that it was a deliberate attempt by them to disrupt the country and cause panic and terror which shows that the communists had been terrorising the country before and so Goebbel is ready to believe that they would start the fire as soon as he is told. By Josh Congdon ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Holocaust Sources Questions

    a one armed Jew and makes the remark "look, a one armed Jew, twice as useless" The next scene shows us the thoughts of "Amon Goethe" through one of his speeches. In his speech he refers to the extermination of Jews as a "great day" "today is history" In the

  2. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source J is a piece of primary evidence. It is a photograph of the Reichstag the morning after the fire. From the three sources I think it is more likely that the Nazis started the fire because out of the three two blame the Nazis, source I and J.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Goering obviously isn't going to admit that he set fire to the Reichstag as he is on trial, so dismissing General Halder's claims is expected. But again, there's nothing to prove that he did do it, or that he didn't.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    not as useful as it could be, as Goebbels' job was to manipulate the truth in favour of the Nazis. So because this account is reporting what the Nazis did that night, this source cannot be reliable and only slightly useful, when supported by Source A.

  1. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    Question 4 Which Source do you consider least reliable? Do you agree that this means it is useless to a historian studying the German people's knowledge of the 'Final Solution'? I consider Source 9 to be the least reliable source. I view this source in the light that it is anonymous and so I believe that because there is

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    This is pointed out in Source E in 1942's indifference row. Source D states this in "They never came back to that compartment". Sources A and D represent the victims prospective who are in a better position to asses everything.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Another explicit agreement between the sources is how it is inferred that the Nazis blame the Communist party and in particular its extremist followers for the events that transpired on the night of 27th February 1933. This is clear from source C from the title; 'The Red Peril'.

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    So eventually von Papen persuades Hindenburg that the most extreme Nazi polices could be resisted even with Hitler as chancellor, so Hindenburg appoints Hitler as chancellor and Von Papen as vice chancellor. Hitler got two-thirds of the majority by saying there was an emergency and the communists must not take their seats this cut out 81 MPs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work