• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

"Religion's are notorious for promoting Racial Segregation". Discuss with reference to one specific historical period.

Extracts from this document...


"Religion's are notorious for promoting Racial Segregation". Discuss with reference to one specific historical period. Racial segregation is a system of legal racial discrimination. Racial segregation has been apparent many times in our history and is still apparent today, especially in the Arab world such as in Israel and Afghanistan. There are many factors fro racial segregation such as economic, social, historic and allegedly religion. I will asses the claim that "religion promotes racial segregation" which I believe to be false. By examining evidence from racial segregation in the 19th and 20th centuries I intend to conclude my claim. Christianity has been an important force within this, as has Islam, so by examining these religions, within my argument, I will be helped to conclude to my claim. Apartheid Apartheid was a system, which existed in South Africa for about 50years. It was abolished in the late 1980's following a rapid change in public perception of racial segregation throughout the world. Apartheid is an Afrikaans word meaning 'separation' or 'apart hood'. In English it means any legally sanctioned system of racial segregation. Basically, Apartheid was racial discrimination institutionalised. History of South Africa, leading to Apartheid The English and Dutch colonised South Africa in the 17th century. They used firearms to defeat the Africans, take the land and make the Africans into a race of servants. They believed that the Africans were ignorant, stupid and they gave them little and poor education, while the Europeans were educated thoroughly and expensively. In 1910, the union of South Africa was set up. This meant that the two white people, the Boers and the English, were united, after the two Boer wars, and given self-government. By doing this though the British liberal government had forgotten to safeguard the interests of three-quarters of the population, the black Africans. A member of the house of lords, supported by a bishop, did propse that africans should have the right to stand for parliament in South Africa, but the idea was pushed aside and the afircans were left without protection in the hand of their white empolyers. ...read more.


After the failure of the reconstruction, white people saw their chance to obtain that power they once had and so took it, getting revenge for losing cheap labour and the satisfaction of power. Throughout all this, Christianity gave great support. In Mt. Olive Baptist church, in Tefell county, Georgia, education classes were frequently held, of which they would teach to those with less education than themselves, the black people. This suggests that the churches were trying to solve the problems in society, caused by racial segregation and so opposed racial segregation. The so-called "Jim Crow Laws" were now regulated racial segregation. In 1896, the Supreme Court concluded the Jim Crow laws were constitutional as long as they allowed for separate but equal facilities. In the following years, the court made this statement a hollow and meaningless requirement by approving discrimination, even in the face of evidence of profound inequalities and un-religious ideas in practise. In addition to the Jim Crow Laws, society was expected to enforce the Jim Crow Etiquette. This was a set of unwritten rules governing how blacks and whites should interact. Not only were they politically separated but socially separated. Breaking this code could result in a lynching, a brutal form of sadistic murder. Between 1578-1898, 10,000 lynching took place. Murder s totally against most religions and when it is shown with no remorse as it is here; it is easy to suggest that the racial segregation and discrimination appearing here was definitely not religious. The murder of Emmett Till in 1955 shows that even with changing public perception of the racial segregation laws after WWII, racial segregation was still at large. Many black radio preachers and church preachers were talking about Emmett Till, demanding "something must be done in Mississippi now". This shows that Christianity here criticised the actions of racial segregation and the laws in America that controlled this segregation. ...read more.


Rather it is, like racism, historic, social and economic problems promoting racial segregation and religion. Why do we practise racial segregation? Often in the past when racial segregation has been practised, it has been legal. The laws have allowed it to be practised. This could be one reason why it has been practised. Our conscience is often controlled by an external authority; our friends and family, but more by laws, and by people who set them, the government. This is due to punishments being set to discipline those who break he law. However not all laws are good ones, such as those legalising racial segregation. Even so, from an early age these are pressed firmly into our conscience and so even if we learn they are not right (at an older age), we learn we must do them, to survive in society and to not disappoint external authorities. This principle allows us to accept the practise of racial segregation, even if it seems unjust. The whole decision making of what is just and what is unjust becomes turned upside down when you have a corrupt external authority. Religion helps provide justice. As I have already shown, religion is a powerful motivation and inspiration to people, overriding external authorities when it seems just. The reason for this is that religion answers first to god, then society and god principley aims to achieve justice. Racial segregation and racism is unjust and therefore god seeks to fight against it through religion, and not promote it. There is a thin line between the connections of religion and racism. Promoting it and working against it stem from religious doctrines. Though South Africa's racial segregation was not primarily anything to do with religion, the aim was to protect the white race and so suggests it comes from the aim to protect ones group in society. Therefore religion can promote racial segregation, though not meaning to, but the force that works against racial segregation is much stronger as it is based on faith and not so much laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. What impact did Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam have on the civil ...

    This uncompromising strength and ambition that Malcolm X conveyed empowered African-Americans and thus, there was a greater African-American voice within the USA in the period of 1960-1965. The growing presence of the Nation of Islam with its extreme and often perceived offensive views of its members in the USA between

  2. Why did white minority rule last so long in South Africa?

    Unfortunately there was little 'middle peasantry' to talk of in the country at the time, and the small amount that existed were rapidly dwindling. The ANC could not point to a single victory by 1935 when J.B Marks, head of the CPSA, pronounced the Congress as 'literally dead'.

  1. Martin Luther King Jr.

    King was and still is one of the most influence leaders of all time. King played a big part in shaping a society; "Never in recorded history has there been a greater change in the status of a social group within a shorter time" (Peter Drucker 1994: p92)

  2. How far did the role and status of women change 1914 and 1928

    Malcolm X said that King was too 'moderate'. Malcolm became popular because of his speeches. This was when another black group got involved. This group was called 'the black panthers'. This group said, "Blacks should not defend for themselves". This group also used violence.

  1. Blacks were substantially better off in 1877 than they had been in 1863.' How ...

    The second Civil Rights Act was passed on 1st March 1875 and said that all persons be entitled to full and equal employment of accommodation in 'inns, public conveyances on land or water, theatres, and other places of public amusement'.

  2. Why is President John F Kennedy such a famous and controversial figure in history?

    The source is not a balanced assessment of Kennedy but is still useful. The source is only limited to Kennedy's actions at the start of the Cuban missile crisis. Plus the view of Kennedy may change over time. It is also limited as it doesn't tell us how Kennedy resolved it or showed any positive ability in Kennedy.

  1. Martin and Malcolm: Two Voices for Justice

    34 people dead, 4,000 arrested, and whole blocks of buildings burned to the ground.26 Upon visiting the scene, Martin received a hostile response to his message of nonviolence and began to realize that the economic issues surrounding class relations comprised a greater problem for blacks than racism.

  2. The importance of Lyndon Johnson in bringing about Civil Rights.

    In Ben Walsh?s OCR Modern World History (History in focus) textbook, says about Kennedy, ??unlike his successor he was not as strong when it came to convincing Congress to back him.? As this was written for GCSE students to study and is approved by the government, this textbook should be non-biased and therefore the interpretation quoted should be non-biased.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work