• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Revelations regarding British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Treaty of Versailles Revelations regarding British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles On 18 January, 1919, the Paris Peace Conference opened at Versailles, just outside Paris, France. The war had ended on 11 November the previous year and the three major victorious powers - the USA, Great Britain and France (led by President Woodrow Wilson, David Lloyd George and Georges Clemenceau respectively) had high but conflicting ambitions at the conference. Lloyd George later spoke of the task which he had set himself for the treaty: "to restore where restoration is just, to organize reparations where damage and injury have been inflicted, and to establish guarantees and securities in so far as human foresight could do so, against the repetition of those crimes and horrors from which the world is just emerging". After much discussion at Versailles, severe debate amongst Great Britain's leading intellectuals was provoked. Economist John Maynard Keynes, writing on 26 May 1919, spoke of the "unjust" and "inexpedient" treatment of Germany (he threatened to retract his services if Lloyd George continued to "lead us all into ...read more.

Middle

On 28 June 1919, the Principal Allied and Associated Powers, and Germany, signed the Treaty of Versailles. The following day, Austen Chamberlain wrote to his sister contemplating the events of the previous months, and specifically the "dangerous temptation" of Germany to rage war on her Eastern frontier, due to her "hatred and contempt for the Poles". However, he goes on to say no democratic country "can or will make aggressive war its...business, though it may easily enough flare up in sudden passion". How great a concern this was for Britain opens up a very important question - would commitments lie with the empire or the continent? Naturally, only time would tell, despite Chamberlain's final reflection ("Think of Germany with its 60 or 70 millions of people and France with its dwindling 40! I shudder!"). Despite all the criticism of the treaty, and the news that German children were starving on the streets, Prime Minister David Lloyd George maintained support for his decisions. ...read more.

Conclusion

Consequently differences of opinion concerning the treaty became more apparent. J. L. Garvin, editor of The Observer, commented in 1933 as follows: "The mistake...was not to have crossed the Rhine in full massiveness in 1919. [Furthermore] the psychological infatuation of their hereditary militarism was not thoroughly broken". Duff Cooper, writing to The Times in 1939 reproduces Garvin's attitude: "If German had been left stronger in 1919 she would sooner have been in a position to do what she is doing today". It is easy to comment as such with hindsight though - Hitler's actions must be considered as an exception to the events which Lloyd George's "human foresight" could have prepared for. Yet even as late as 1937, British Ambassador in Berlin Sir Nevile Henderson wrote of "amend[ing]...the injustices in the Versailles Treaty". British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles were, not surprisingly, unharmonious. However, views such as the harshness of reparations and requirement for adjustments to be made to the initial treaty prevailed within most schools of thought. The difficulty of establishing an effective treaty must not be underestimated under any circumstances though. A treaty to please everyone simply does not exist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    With the defeat of the Palestinians in 1949, the Jewish people established a state of Israel. The picture had not only changed in Europe, but as well as in the Middle East. In Europe the Allies were unwilling to allow Germany to ever produce a similar Reich to the one Hitler had created.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Keynes divides the situation into three categories; the falling off of the European productivity, the difficulty of transport and exchange and Europe's incapability to consume its supplies. The decrease of Europe's productivity is difficult to estimate and is evident without any proof or reasoning whatsoever, as it has been the main principle of Mr.

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    justification that was needed in order to draw up the treaty and the British managed to justify the treaty for its own use while most British felt that the treaty itself was unjustifiable. The Germans did not have a voice to question the justification of the treaty until the late

  2. To what extent can the Treaty of Versailles be described as fair.

    This treaty made Russia give up a lot of land such as Ukraine, Finland, Poland, the Caucasus as well as many other terms that crippled Russia.

  1. Evacuation of Children

    This shows the mothers will miss the children a lot, as she said they "pressed against the iron gates" showing that they were more than just stood there, but actually pressing their faces against the gates. Although this gives information, it does have limitations.

  2. Wish there was a Lord Keynes here, today?

    He does not mince his words. "The policy of reducing Germany to servitude for a generation, of degrading the lives of millions of human beings, and of depriving a whole nation of happiness should be abhorrent and detestable -- abhorrent and detestable, even if it were possible, even if it

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?

    He also demanded that the wartime alliance between the Allies be continued. This differed significantly from the attitude and vision of President Wilson, who had only become involved with the war when it was absolutely unavoidable. Wilson was an idealist and wanted to let Germany off lightly.

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    However, Wilson was very much against it. He did not want France to rule over land which wasn?t rightfully theirs and did not want to force the Germans living in the area to live under French control. This was not a priority for Lloyd George, but he did want to help the German economy and industry, as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work