• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Revelations regarding British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles.

Extracts from this document...


The Treaty of Versailles Revelations regarding British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles On 18 January, 1919, the Paris Peace Conference opened at Versailles, just outside Paris, France. The war had ended on 11 November the previous year and the three major victorious powers - the USA, Great Britain and France (led by President Woodrow Wilson, David Lloyd George and Georges Clemenceau respectively) had high but conflicting ambitions at the conference. Lloyd George later spoke of the task which he had set himself for the treaty: "to restore where restoration is just, to organize reparations where damage and injury have been inflicted, and to establish guarantees and securities in so far as human foresight could do so, against the repetition of those crimes and horrors from which the world is just emerging". After much discussion at Versailles, severe debate amongst Great Britain's leading intellectuals was provoked. Economist John Maynard Keynes, writing on 26 May 1919, spoke of the "unjust" and "inexpedient" treatment of Germany (he threatened to retract his services if Lloyd George continued to "lead us all into ...read more.


On 28 June 1919, the Principal Allied and Associated Powers, and Germany, signed the Treaty of Versailles. The following day, Austen Chamberlain wrote to his sister contemplating the events of the previous months, and specifically the "dangerous temptation" of Germany to rage war on her Eastern frontier, due to her "hatred and contempt for the Poles". However, he goes on to say no democratic country "can or will make aggressive war its...business, though it may easily enough flare up in sudden passion". How great a concern this was for Britain opens up a very important question - would commitments lie with the empire or the continent? Naturally, only time would tell, despite Chamberlain's final reflection ("Think of Germany with its 60 or 70 millions of people and France with its dwindling 40! I shudder!"). Despite all the criticism of the treaty, and the news that German children were starving on the streets, Prime Minister David Lloyd George maintained support for his decisions. ...read more.


Consequently differences of opinion concerning the treaty became more apparent. J. L. Garvin, editor of The Observer, commented in 1933 as follows: "The mistake...was not to have crossed the Rhine in full massiveness in 1919. [Furthermore] the psychological infatuation of their hereditary militarism was not thoroughly broken". Duff Cooper, writing to The Times in 1939 reproduces Garvin's attitude: "If German had been left stronger in 1919 she would sooner have been in a position to do what she is doing today". It is easy to comment as such with hindsight though - Hitler's actions must be considered as an exception to the events which Lloyd George's "human foresight" could have prepared for. Yet even as late as 1937, British Ambassador in Berlin Sir Nevile Henderson wrote of "amend[ing]...the injustices in the Versailles Treaty". British attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles were, not surprisingly, unharmonious. However, views such as the harshness of reparations and requirement for adjustments to be made to the initial treaty prevailed within most schools of thought. The difficulty of establishing an effective treaty must not be underestimated under any circumstances though. A treaty to please everyone simply does not exist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Keynes then reminds the reader some of the problems; the production in Europe has decreased 30%. Before the war, Germany produced 85% of food consumed by its population, the fertility of the soil has now diminished by 40% and food stock diminished by 55%.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    justification that was needed in order to draw up the treaty and the British managed to justify the treaty for its own use while most British felt that the treaty itself was unjustifiable. The Germans did not have a voice to question the justification of the treaty until the late

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    The lay down in front of the dead or wounded people some caressed those who were still alive and spoke to them in a low voice. Then I heard a series ! of shots. I looked into the pit and saw that the bodies were twitching....

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?

    That Germany was solely responsible for the war ii. That Germany should, therefore, be liable to reparations iii. That Germany's armed forces should be limited in order to help prevent any retaliatory actions These were the three points that the treaty was based around. The big three could not each get what they wanted, but needed to reach a compromise.

  1. Evacuation of Children

    Firstly, it was written in 1988, after the event and written in a textbook, so its purpose would be for factual information, so there woud be no clear reason why it would be biased, and the date is after censorship, therefore anything can be written.

  2. To what extent can the Treaty of Versailles be described as fair.

    They were also only allowed six battle ships. The Rhineland was also demilitarised this would make it very easy to be invaded by France. When the League of Nations was set up it was seen as an international police force but it had no real power as one of the

  1. Was The Treaty Of Versailles Just?

    So he was generally worried about the well being of France and their protection from Germany therefore wanting Germany to be harshly treated so it had no chance of recovering. Lloyd George really only wanted to please Britain so he announced that he would treat Germany harshly, giving the appearance

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    If the land was split, they would ultimately be under polish control. The Rhine border sparked a lot of controversy too. Many say that Clemenceau was crazy to think that he would be able to seize that part of land since it had been under German control for so long.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work