• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Roman medicine was the same as Greek medicine; do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Sofia Chand Miss Smith and Miss Wheeler, History (RM31) Roman medicine was the same as Greek medicine; do you agree? Journeying from the Greek period of medicine to that of the Romans, how much changed and what stayed the same regarding medical practises, anatomical knowledge and accuracy of theories and ideas? Furthermore, which outweighs the other? Firstly, continuity between the two empires was that they both believed in the theory of the four humours. Originally, the Greeks established the theory, however, the Romans helped to develop this theory into something much more useful. Galen is the scientist who is most well-known at the time for working at the theory of the four humours. Like Hippocrates, he believed in the four humours but Galen thought that there was a more rational solution to balancing the humours. For instance, if the symptom was too much phlegm then the patient?s problem was caused by a cold and should therefore need to take something hot, such as pepper. Hippocrates laid the foundations for which the Romans then progressed, even though some of their theories were not entirely correct. ...read more.

Middle

Another key idea that both, Romans and Greeks, believed strongly in, was that gods and goddesses could cure and cause illnesses. This shows that religion played a really big part in their lives and outlines the theme of superstition in both empires. The Greeks had built Ascelepions as refuge to the sick; it was a peaceful temple where the ill could go in order to get cured. The Ascelepions were devoted to the Greek god Asclepius, the god of healing, and they firmly believed that at night, their god and his daughters would visit them and leave them cured. The Romans however appealed to their chiefly goddess of health, Salus. Gods were part of their everyday life and were expected to be powerful. When medical treatment was expensive, risky and painful, there was good reason to use every means available to help prevent illness. Asking for the help of gods would often be a first option instead of a last resort. A huge difference between Greek and Roman medicine was public health which means what the government or whoever was in power at that time did in order to prevent or cure epidemics. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, I would disagree that Greek and Roman medicine were the same and instead I would argue that in fact, they are very different. Greek medicine was very much based on loose theories and ideas as they did not have a plentiful amount of evidence to back them up, as well as this, the Greeks did not dissect or perform surgical operations that allowed them to explore the human body or animals that we?re similar too. This suggests that they weren?t as familiar with anatomy and disease like the Romans were. The Romans made sure they were educated in the human body and made some important links from dissecting animals that then formed stronger ideas that were quite credible in that day and age. The Romans were much more practical people and they also showed they had more ability than the Greeks. They were able to supply their empire with an extensive public health system that was very helpful and did actually prevent epidemics and look after their people well. Greek medicine was very different to Roman medicine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What were the origins of Roman religion and how did it progress?

    They would often attend lectures in Athens - paid for, of course, by the money taken from the poorer population. The choices made at the conferences would give you an image of yourself to be projected to everyone. The exceptions to this case were the few cults and mystery religions around Rome.

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    In Weaponry the quality of weapons available to the Romans was vastly superior to the Celts because of the wealth that had been accumulated by the Romans in conquering land. The Roman army was supplied with excellent condition weapons INDIVIDUALLY tailoured for each soldier even though there were thousands of

  1. 4 Humours

    Use of herbal remedies wasn't new. This had formed part of Prehistoric and Egyptian medicine. Basing the cause of disease on the elements is new. This required a change in the way that doctors approached illnesses. Recording findings wasn't new.

  2. Improvements in Public Health

    He managed to identify a water pump as the source of the disease. When he removed the handle the causes of cholera immediately declined. It took another six years before this theory was more widely accepted. John Snow also made development in anaesthetics and made them safer and more effective for use on humans.

  1. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    The joint or extended family was usually composed of three or more generations, living together in the same house, cooking from the same kitchen, owning property in common and pooling their incomes for common spending.22 The father was more or less the household head but it was the brothers who ran the affairs of the family property.

  2. What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall?

    Whatever Pausinias meant, it does seem clear that disturbances in southern Scotland caused the Roman advance and Frere suggests that this was sparked off by an attack on the pro-Roman Votadini by the Selgovae outside Roman territory. If Frere is right, it means that the re-conquest of Lowland Scotland was

  1. Did the Roman invasion of Britain happen in Sussex or Richborough in Kent as ...

    Or the fact that their ships had square sails meaning that they had to sail with the wind behind them to get anywhere, as the wind would have been blowing South West this would have taken them away from Sussex, directly to Richborough.

  2. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    into the cup if you had too much blood in spring 1. Clinical Observation[g]: Doctors had to follow FOUR STEPS when examining the patient: 1. Diagnosis: studying the patients symptoms 2. Prognosis: Predicting what course the illness will take 3.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work