• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Romanov Family Question F

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question F The first point about source J is the fact that it had been written more recently than all the other sources. It had been written over 75 years since the murder had occurred. Being written recently the advances in modern technology would have helped greatly to solve what had happened to the Tsar and his family. This source adds strong and conclusive evidence to back up other sources, when at the same time giving a new angle and questions to others. This source gives us a extract from a newspaper from December 1994.This source told the readers about the recent discoveries and shed light on to a problem that the people of that time would not have seen, this was because the source had been written by an independent author after the USSR had separated. This means that there should have not been any sign of biased data. So this means that the source should be quite reliable. ...read more.

Middle

This is the first source that tells us what had happened to the bodies of the Romanov family after they had been murdered. It says "A lorry carried the corpses to the four brother's mine." Then were the bodies "Chopped into pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." This source does not tell us if the pieces had been buried or not. When on the other hand source J states the bodies where buried in "a shallow pit burial", but then says when the mine failed to collapse, the bodies where then put back on the lorry. Then the lorry became bogged down in a swap and the remains were buried right there. The word "bodies" had been used, not the pieces of bodies. Also the fact that it does not even tell us if the bodies had been buried form the bogged lorry or if they have still been in the lorry. Either way it still contradicts source C. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source H is a diagram of where the Romanovs and the guards are supposed to have been standing. It comes from the same book by Judge Sokolov as to source C. This source had been published in 1924. This source does not tell us how they were killed or where they had been killed. This source does not even identify were the Romanov family members had been standing. Finally source I is a message that had been sent by the Ural Soviet to the Petrograd Soviet. This had occurred on the 20th July 1918. This source talks about the Tsars wife and son still being alive and safe, one could say this is the most confusing source. I do not believe this source as to all other sources contradict with it. I just fail to see Why the Ural Soviet had lied about the Tsars wife and son still being alive. In conclusion I have found out that source J seems to ask more questions than it can solve, it puts many doubts over who was killed where and when. Putting a very new angle on the murder of the Romanovs. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What happened to the Romanovs?

    They had to be finished off by stabbing them to death. The massacre was complete and the entire Romanov family was slaughtered. In an interview with Pavel Medvedev, these described events are supported. He was a Red Guard commander and this is the only eye-witness account from 1919.

  2. Stalin Question 3

    Altogether around 30,000 members of the armed forces were purged. The purges served to remove any threat of rebellion against Stalin, and also to make a climate of fear throughout the population, a fear both of those who had been purged and of being purged themselves.

  1. What Happened To The Romanovs

    Two sources, A and C, say that the murders were committed on the lower floor and source B does not state anything as to the whereabouts of the events. Source C agrees with both of the other sources by saying that the murder was carried out using revolvers but then

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    I feel source H would be more reliable than sources F and G, because I think that source F as a photograph was set up to look like the scene of the murder. Also the picture may have been constructed on the information that was available at the time about what the murder scene looked like.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Medvedev was a Bolshevik. It tells you a lot more detail about what happened when the Romanov family were killed. This source is reliable because he was there when the shots were fired, however it could be unreliable because he was outside when the actual shots were fired.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    However, the reliability of such sources is, in turn, questionable. Source A is also challenged by source C, which says, 'Sergeyev, on handing the case to me, had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev House', whilst Source A, which is

  1. The Romanov Family - source based work.

    Sources A and B do not refer to anything to do with chopping up the bodies and burning them with petrol and acid. In source C it does not say anything about the surviving members and that they left on a train from Ekaterinburg and this is not mentioned in source A and C.

  2. Stalin and Russia - Sources Question

    This is strange in a way. In Stalin's time people had to be careful of what they said or they may have faced death. I could not imagine anyone being relaxed with a man like this especially while engaged in conversation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work