Romanov Family Question F

Authors Avatar

                Question F

              The first point about source J is the fact that it had been written more recently than all the other sources. It had been written over 75 years since the murder had occurred. Being written recently the advances in modern technology would have helped greatly to solve what had happened to the Tsar and his family. This source adds strong and conclusive evidence to back up other sources, when at the same time giving a new angle and questions to others.

             This source gives us a extract from a newspaper from December 1994.This source told the readers about the recent discoveries and shed light on to a problem that the people of that time would not have seen, this was because the source had been written by an independent author after the USSR had separated. This means that there should have not been any sign of biased data. So this means that the source should be quite reliable.

              Starting with source A, it is a report from a American Newspaper in December 1918. It describes the findings of Judge Sergeyev. But theses two sources give very different conclusions. Source J states that “Nicolas, his wife, and three of their daughters.” Were only found in the grave. This would mean that the Tsars son and other daughter were not killed with the rest of their family. This is the reason why there bodies have not yet been discovered. Source A states that “The Tsar, the family doctor, two servants, and the maid were shot.” It is possible for both sources to be true, but yet highly unlikely because many people would not kill people separately, at different times and locations. Then bury some of the bodies in one place and bury some of the others in a different place.

Join now!

                Now source B, both sources A, B are from the same questionable source that is from Judge Sergeyev. Source B is an extract written by the British ambassador, Sir Charles Elliot who had been investigating the murder of the Tsar and his family in 1918. The reason for this report was to inform the British Government of what had been going on in Russia at that time. There is a major amount of irony when comparing the two sources B, J. Because source B claims that “No corpses were discovered, nor any ...

This is a preview of the whole essay