• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Romanov Family Question F

Extracts from this document...


Question F The first point about source J is the fact that it had been written more recently than all the other sources. It had been written over 75 years since the murder had occurred. Being written recently the advances in modern technology would have helped greatly to solve what had happened to the Tsar and his family. This source adds strong and conclusive evidence to back up other sources, when at the same time giving a new angle and questions to others. This source gives us a extract from a newspaper from December 1994.This source told the readers about the recent discoveries and shed light on to a problem that the people of that time would not have seen, this was because the source had been written by an independent author after the USSR had separated. This means that there should have not been any sign of biased data. So this means that the source should be quite reliable. ...read more.


This is the first source that tells us what had happened to the bodies of the Romanov family after they had been murdered. It says "A lorry carried the corpses to the four brother's mine." Then were the bodies "Chopped into pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." This source does not tell us if the pieces had been buried or not. When on the other hand source J states the bodies where buried in "a shallow pit burial", but then says when the mine failed to collapse, the bodies where then put back on the lorry. Then the lorry became bogged down in a swap and the remains were buried right there. The word "bodies" had been used, not the pieces of bodies. Also the fact that it does not even tell us if the bodies had been buried form the bogged lorry or if they have still been in the lorry. Either way it still contradicts source C. ...read more.


Source H is a diagram of where the Romanovs and the guards are supposed to have been standing. It comes from the same book by Judge Sokolov as to source C. This source had been published in 1924. This source does not tell us how they were killed or where they had been killed. This source does not even identify were the Romanov family members had been standing. Finally source I is a message that had been sent by the Ural Soviet to the Petrograd Soviet. This had occurred on the 20th July 1918. This source talks about the Tsars wife and son still being alive and safe, one could say this is the most confusing source. I do not believe this source as to all other sources contradict with it. I just fail to see Why the Ural Soviet had lied about the Tsars wife and son still being alive. In conclusion I have found out that source J seems to ask more questions than it can solve, it puts many doubts over who was killed where and when. Putting a very new angle on the murder of the Romanovs. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    In 1956, on the pretext of promoting the progress of science, Mao Zedong called on intellectuals to "let a hundred flowers bloom, and a hundred schools of thought contend" in the arts and sciences. Heated discussions exposed conflicts that had long existed between intellectuals and the Chinese communist regime, and feelings ran high in Beijing.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Bukharin would have had immunity from Stalin here. In the source Bukharin revealed that Stalin had an insecurity. This insecurity is that Stalin knows internally that he is not any greater than anybody else. Bukharin makes a revelation about Stalin which is very personal.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    second investigator of the Romanov case reveals, "My predecessor, Sergeyev, on handling the case to me, had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev house". Nevertheless, even though he may have found enough evidence for the entire Romanov family to have

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    Source C suggests that judge Sergeyev 'had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev house'. Sources A and B in contrast imply that judge Sergeyev did not believe this, and as such either both sources A and B or source C is incorrect.

  1. Stalin Sources Question

    This source is 100% over flattering towards Stalin. It sees Stalin as a God and the person says that his baby's first word would be Stalin, which is unrealistic. I would say that the reason this is over flattering is because the person is scared of Stalin. As you know Stalin was a mass murderer and the writer

  2. Stalin Souurces Questions

    importance and white shows religion, so could show that Stalin is an angel. The fact that he is standing beside this new power station indicated that the artist maybe be trying to show how successful Stalin has been in bringing Russia up to the same level as the rest of the worlds technology.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    3) 'Pravda' was the communist party paper. Therefore we can not fully count on the reliability of source E which appeared in this paper, it is also biased. The published speech which source E is, could have been just part of Russian manipulation and propaganda. In fact it seems that way after reading it; the description of Stalin is very much exaggerated and "over the top".

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Source C mentions that the murders took place in the Ipatiev House which both sources A and B agree on. Source C also mentions that the murders took place "in one of the rooms in the basement." Similarly Source A suggests that the crime was supposed to have been committed in the lower storey of the building.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work