• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Romanov Family Question F

Extracts from this document...


Question F The first point about source J is the fact that it had been written more recently than all the other sources. It had been written over 75 years since the murder had occurred. Being written recently the advances in modern technology would have helped greatly to solve what had happened to the Tsar and his family. This source adds strong and conclusive evidence to back up other sources, when at the same time giving a new angle and questions to others. This source gives us a extract from a newspaper from December 1994.This source told the readers about the recent discoveries and shed light on to a problem that the people of that time would not have seen, this was because the source had been written by an independent author after the USSR had separated. This means that there should have not been any sign of biased data. So this means that the source should be quite reliable. ...read more.


This is the first source that tells us what had happened to the bodies of the Romanov family after they had been murdered. It says "A lorry carried the corpses to the four brother's mine." Then were the bodies "Chopped into pieces and burned with the aid of petrol and sulphuric acid." This source does not tell us if the pieces had been buried or not. When on the other hand source J states the bodies where buried in "a shallow pit burial", but then says when the mine failed to collapse, the bodies where then put back on the lorry. Then the lorry became bogged down in a swap and the remains were buried right there. The word "bodies" had been used, not the pieces of bodies. Also the fact that it does not even tell us if the bodies had been buried form the bogged lorry or if they have still been in the lorry. Either way it still contradicts source C. ...read more.


Source H is a diagram of where the Romanovs and the guards are supposed to have been standing. It comes from the same book by Judge Sokolov as to source C. This source had been published in 1924. This source does not tell us how they were killed or where they had been killed. This source does not even identify were the Romanov family members had been standing. Finally source I is a message that had been sent by the Ural Soviet to the Petrograd Soviet. This had occurred on the 20th July 1918. This source talks about the Tsars wife and son still being alive and safe, one could say this is the most confusing source. I do not believe this source as to all other sources contradict with it. I just fail to see Why the Ural Soviet had lied about the Tsars wife and son still being alive. In conclusion I have found out that source J seems to ask more questions than it can solve, it puts many doubts over who was killed where and when. Putting a very new angle on the murder of the Romanovs. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    the Cultural Revolution set us back twenty years" Millions of students were sent to the countryside to work on the land - thus preventing the reemergence of the Red Guards. So chaotic was the situation that universities did not reopen until 1970.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    Killing just the Tsar would not completely destroy the royal family. Therefore Source I must be unreliable, as it differs from 9 other sources, which all in some way or another back each other up.

  1. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    In conclusion, although source A and B give similar accounts this does not necessarily mean that they are reliable, as the source of information has to be taken into consideration. Both sources A and B ultimately come from Judge Sergeyev; therefore, of course they would have similar information.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    The author of this speech could really believe in what he is saying, people were being brainwashed and indoctrinated all the time, leading to a belief that is expressed in the speech. Due to the heavy propaganda thousands of people actually truly believed in Stalin's greatness and that he is an inspired leader as we read in the source.

  1. What happened to the Romanovs?

    Whatever happens will be through God's will." This was from Alexandra's last letter. The entire family was awaken in the middle of the night on July 17, 1918. The guards explained that there were some shooting in the town and it would be for their safety if they went downstairs.

  2. Stalin Question 3

    There was a group of richer farmers, however, who opposed it. These 'kulaks' owned more land than other farmers, and employed people to work on it. When collectivisation was introduced the kulaks and their supporters rebelled, killing their livestock and wrecking their tools to keep them from the government.

  1. What Happened To The Romanovs

    July and it was believed that the surviving members of the royal family were on it. Source I corroborates this saying that the wife and son had been sent off to a secure place. B) Source C was part of a book by Judge Sokolov, Judge Sergeyev's replacement, published in 1924, after the end of the civil war.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Sokolov states that he believes that all of the family members were all killed in the house where they were staying. However he says that Sergeyev believed that the whole family were shot. This is a totally different account to what he wrote for a report for an American newspaper.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work