• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russia 1914 To 1917: Coursework : Sources Question

Extracts from this document...


Russia 1914 to 1917: Coursework : Sources Question Study Source A. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russia to the outbreak of war in 1914? Source A is a description of events in August 1914 in Russia, written by the daughter of the British ambassador to Russia. She is an independent witness and means that we are able to take her information as reliable. She speaks of the huge enthusiasm that the people on the streets displayed in 1914. She talks of how the procession carried the Tsar's portrait with them while singing their national anthem. This suggests that the people of Russia were very patriotic and fully behind the Tsar and his actions. We are also shown a view of the soldiers going into battle. With many described we can suggest how many men must have volunteered to join the war, probably dreaming of victory and showing their patriotism. They are described as singing and cheering "...with honest open eyes". They too have faith in the Tsar, appearing innocently optimistic to be going into war. Another quote that "the saints would protect them" shows how they are also still in trust of the heavens to protect them and that religion, as well as the Tsar, is a large hope to them. The author also mentions the beginning of the war and the Russian's huge enthusiasm. She explains it by talking of the great armies and the Russian steamroller. This is referring to their army that they thought able to flatten opposition. The optimism of Russia and her allies meant that they expected triumph by Christmas. Russian reactions to the outbreak of war were so fully supportive of the Tsar and their army that they expected their opposition to be pathetic in comparison. Study Sources A, B and C. Sources A and B were written by the same person. ...read more.


She writes "Guided by him we shall get through this heavy time." She has placed all her faith in him and truly believes in his power. By this, we can understand that she also will make actions under his guidance, and so it can be concluded and that as a result, her decisions with the government would be largely influenced by Rasputin. In the Tsarinas letter, we are also shown an example of the areas Rasputin is influencing. "He begs you to advance near Riga" is a quote from the source. This shows us Rasputin's command over the decisions of the war, and demonstrates one direction of his power and influence. The source largely supports Radzankio's statement by showing that through the Tsarina Rasputin largely influences the government and its decisions. However, we also see that the Tsar is also influenced but it would be hard to conclude that he would necessarily take Rasputin's and the Tsarina's advice. Source J is from the report of a commission investigating aspects of the Tsars regime, including Rasputin. We can suggest, just from this, that they were already unhappy with the way the Tsar was handling things, and that they were suspicious about Rasputin. However, this source suggests that Rasputin's influence was less extensive. It talks of petitions carried by Rasputin to Court but goes on to say " all of these referred merely to applications of positions, favours, railway concessions the like." The word 'merely' is used as if these matters were not really important and not crucial aspects of government. The source does discuss other aspects of Rasputin, giving an unfavourable image. It talks of his parties, with 'curiously mixed', or in other words disreputable or unrespectable guests. It was things like this that made people dislike Rasputin that is seen by the negativity towards him in the source. This may suggest a reason for Radzianko's statement, if he also disliked Rasputin and wanted exaggerate the situation, as this source does not otherwise support it. ...read more.


It was during the war that Rasputin entered the picture more forcefully. He was a monk and the son of a Siberian peasant. The Tsarina believed that he was a miracle worker, as he seemed to be able to cure her son's haemophilia. However, Rasputin lived a shameful life with many parties of disreputable people as written in Source J. He was also reported to be sleeping with many of the leading women of the court. Source M shows him with his 'aristocratic harem'. This source also illustrates how the scandal was known in both Europe and the USA. This brought shame to the Russian Royal Family. The scandal surrounding his life did nothing to promote the royal family but resulted in discrediting it. The situation became critical after August 1915, once the Tsar had taken control of the army. The Tsarina was left in charge of the government and totally under the influence of Rasputin. Men were given posts in government not because they were good at their job but simply because they knew how to please Rasputin. He highlighted the weaknesses of the autocratic regime. We see in Source I, how especially the Tsarina takes and follows every message and command that Rasputin gives. Source K shows us how this was portrayed to the public. This gave a feeble image of the Royal Family to the public. They saw that it was no longer the Tsar running the country but Rasputin. In December 1916, a group of nobles killed Rasputin. They believed that they were saving Russia. However, after Rasputin's death there was little change in Russia. The country and the Tsars problems continued after his murder. This suggests that Rasputin may not have been the real cause. Because of this, I agree with the historian's statement that "Rasputin's death changed little. He was not the main cause of unrest in Russia 1917". I think it is true to say that he was a symptom, not a cause of the problem. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    let the situation grow more and more out of control before stepping in, when it was too late. The Tsar's sudden preparation for the war with Germany had left many people in Russia working together for the war effort. However, opinion changed when the costs of war hit home.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    the profits there were no incentives to work because everyone was paid the same even if one person did more than another. Deng gave the people the opportunity to do things themselves; they could start their own businesses, private enterprise was encouraged and soon brought about an increase in wealth.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He needed to create a good image to the public. Similarly, source C is a photograph of women reaching up to Stalin thanking him, making Stalin look like a well respected, good man. He was shaking the hands of the women which shows he believed in equality.

  2. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    He believed in 'suppression first, and then, and only then reform', he wanted to work out how to feed the growing population of Russia. Peasants were very conservative and the form of farming they did was called strip farming which was were they farm for their needs no one else's,

  1. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    the atrocities that have followed Collectivisation and this claim is supported by the fact that Stalin sent out a requisition squad and took all the grain from villages. The consequence of this was the death of 5-7 million people from famine.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Stalin tells us how that a group of about thirty men went to try to recover timber from a heavily flooded river. When they returned there was one member of the group missing. Stalin then questioned the men about their missing comrade, but they did not seem too bothered to answer him.

  1. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    not even indicating that the family or the Tsar or anyone was actually even killed there, it only shows their supposed positions, and even that is unclear as the Historian would have no way of telling who is who exactly.

  2. History - Russia

    Such a respected and noble man would be more likely to tell the truth in all situations, even under questioning from the Menshevik interrogators. From this we can deduce that this account of the murders is probably fairly reliable with it also being the closest we have as to an eyewitness account.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work