• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russia, once one of the largest and most feared empires in the world, would be brought to its knees through bad organisation and control. Nicholas II became the Tsar of Russia in 1894.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Russia, once one of the largest and most feared empires in the world, would be brought to its knees through bad organisation and control. Nicholas II became the Tsar of Russia in 1894, a Tsar is a leader much like a fascist who cannot be questioned or opposed. Nicholas was a good man but lacked the qualities which once built his great nation, he was very weak willed and had no interest in the running of his country, 'I am not ready to become Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling.' His wife, Alexandra, easily influenced him. She was a German who had married into the family after Nicholas became Tsar, in the time of war her nationality caused unrest. She managed to take control over her husbands decision making, turning his view to almost a totally autocratic leadership, this ment that even further distance was put between the Tsar and his dying people. After ten years in rule Nicholas and Alexandra had produced five children, four girls and one boy, Alexis, who was the heir to the throne. Soon after his birth, Alexis was diagnosed with haemophilia, a fatal blood disease that had no cure. A peasant man called Rasputin had been gaining respect in the Russian streets as a very gifted holy-man with incredible healing powers. ...read more.

Middle

The country was polarised between the fabulously rich and the peasants who barely produced enough food to survive. 80% of the population were peasants and 1% of the country's elite owned around 25% of the land. Virtually half of new born infants died before the age of 5. This caused massive resentment. Many peasants were forced to leave the fields to seek work in the industrial cities. There conditions of work, pay and accommodation were dreadful. Unemployment was at a high level. There existed no trade unions and there was no legal protection for workers who would often work up to fourteen hours per day for miserable wages. In 1900 a new elite class developed called the capitalists who created their wealth through banking and enjoyed preferential taxes. They too became the focus for huge peasant resentment. Trade Unions were illegal in the Soviet Union and the first was set-up by a priest who organised a strike in 1905 and march on the palace to present a petition asking for better working conditions, an elected parliament and an end to the war. Tsar Nicholas was not in residence but a company of soldiers arrived and massacred the protesters. A wave of strikes followed and in June 1905 the crew of the battleship Potemkin mutinied. In October a general strike was called. ...read more.

Conclusion

Farms stood un-kept and the transport system was in ruin so supplies could neither be produced or moved. Winter of 1917 was one of the coldest in Russian record causing further disruption (for example, boilers in the standing trains froze and burst). By March 1917, discontent in the country was at a peak. On 7th March 1917 over 20,000 steelworkers were getting locked out of their works over a pay dispute. For the next week many other disputes broke out bringing the whole country to complete standstill. The army then revolted and the Duma asked the Tsar to step down. Finally, the second revolution was concluded when the Tsar announced his abdication in favour of his young son, Alexis on March 15th. I would conclude that World War 1 contributed to the poor economic conditions in the country but these conditions had been evident at least 12 years previously. The mood of the country was (even before the war) already firmly against the Tsar and the capitalists and morale was at an all time low. Hence, the war was probably an important factor in sparking the March 1917 revolution but was not the 'main cause'. Mike Sims 10 DTP History Assignment1b World War l was the main cause of the March Revolution (do you agree?) Mike Sims 10 DTP History Assignment1 How did Rasputin contribute to the downfall of Tsar Nicholas ll ? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    Rasputin was a peasant who called himself a 'Holy Man' and believed he had power to cure people of their illnesses. After Nicholas and Alexandra had tried everything to help their son's illness they turned to Rasputin who seemed to help calm Alexis and sometimes stop the bleeding.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Nicholas chose to ignore this in his reaction. 'That fat fellow Rodzianko has again written me all kinds of nonsense which I shan't even bother to answer.' This ignorance led to the revolution finally taking place. If Tsar Nicholas had taken notice of Rodzianko and had taken appropriate measures to

  1. How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for ...

    However in many respects Witte's reforms hindered Nicholas' security. This is because industrialisation created the working class, which moved to the cities. These people were deeply unhappy due to their poor, cramp, and dirty living conditions. It was these people who rose against him in the 1905 revolution and obviously did not support him.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    It thanks Stalin for everything that he has done and will continue doing for the Russian people. In this source we see many points where Stalin is praised. Source F is taken from a speech by Bukharin, which took place in Paris in 1936.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    In England there is a saying "For King and Country", in this case the Tsar believes he's more important than Russia as the soldiers are only paying their respects to him. Also on the Tsar's military uniform, there is a religious Orthodox symbol.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Stalin asks for the mans disappearance where his friends answer without any empathy for the mans death. The source depicts Stalin as a reasonable and compassionate man who had a strong will for equality and justice. However the reader should also keep in mind the fact the source is biased

  1. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia? ...

    He was as mentioned in the source, "the leader of the Octobrist party", a party which supported the October manifesto. He talks about how the Manifesto made by the Tsar has failed and that no change had been made. This is shown when he says: "to bring about a peaceful, painless transition has failed".

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    to 1963, despite two world wars, foreign intervention and civil war, and other calamities, total industrial output rose more than 52 times. The corresponding figure for the USA was less than six times, while Britain struggled to double her output.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work