• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

russia: what happened to the romanov family question C and D

Extracts from this document...


Russia what happened to the Romanov family Question C and D c) Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source D is an eyewitness account this does not necessarily make it reliable, there a number of factors to consider, one being who it was that wrote the source. In this case in was the 'Whites' who may or may not have altered what Pavel Medvedev said to suit them. The source also says that he was probably tortured this could alter the information he gave. Also the eyewitness himself maybe lying, this could be the case because he said in the interview that he was on the street when the tsar was shot. ...read more.


Source F shows a photograph of the basement in the Ipatiev house where the tsar was supposedly shot. The walls have bullet holes in them and the floor is blood stained. This shows that an act of violence had had defiantly taken place here. It is impossible to tell however whether or not it was the murder of the tsar and his family just by looking at the picture, we can only assume this by the information given in other source such as when sergeyev says "were shot in the Ipatiev House" [source A]. As a source it does not help us to answer key questions like who was murdered, who the murderers were and when they were murdered. ...read more.


Source H is could also be seen as biased as Judge Sokolov was also a Tsarist and appointed by the 'Whites'. The information given in the source however does not give any indication of being one sided. Sources F, G and H agree on many facts. They all show that there is a door in the right hand corner of the room. Also sources G and H both show that guards surrounding the Romanov family backing them against the far wall, This information would fit in with source f and explain the blood stained wall and bullet holes. None of the sources on there own would be particularly useful but used in conjunction with each other and other source a historian would could find them invaluable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    In source H, Krushchev picks out a prime example why Stalin was so fuelled with paranoia. A question like, "Why are your eyes so shifty today?" would have been put forward to an innocent civilian. If Stalin did not like their response he then would have killed them.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Years of work and progress were sacrificed. A whole generation of youth went without education, factories and farms lay idle. China fell even further behind the industrialised powers of the world. History coursework: Assignment B 1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people after 1949 in the following areas: Economic, social, and political?

  1. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    All this makes it very useless to the Historian studying their deaths. Source G is also useless to the Historian; mainly because it is based on an unreliable source so would not give the historian an accurate account of how the family and the Tsar were killed.

  2. Stalin Question 3

    Four of the five others were executed, the fifth, Leon Trotsky was assassinated while in exile in Mexico. Another group to suffer during the Great Purge was the army. Stalin feared the army because Trotsky, his main rival, had led it during the Civil War.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    .", "it is my belief" and "I believe, however" but not what Sergeyev may have actually found or believed himself. Besides, the tone of uncertainty in this source further tarnishes its dependability as the journalist creates an impression that he contradicts and doesn't quite trust the information given to

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This may not be reliable because it is from a report and it was believed to have surviving family members on it, this shows they are not certain. 2. Source B explains in further detail about the murder: source B states more information about the murder.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    in that whoever was murdered, was killed in the lower levels of Ipatiev house. Another difference between source C and sources A and B is the fact that they contradict in what is suggested to them by judge Sergeyev to the authors of each source.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family?

    Based on Judge Sergeyev information he is sure that they were murdered in the Ipatiev House. The bodies were taken away lorry on the 17th July to the Four Brother Mine were they where chopped up and burned. The fatty matter was disposed of with sulphuric acid 'it ran out of the corpses and mixed in with the soil'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work