• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

russia: what happened to the romanov family question C and D

Extracts from this document...


Russia what happened to the Romanov family Question C and D c) Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source D is an eyewitness account this does not necessarily make it reliable, there a number of factors to consider, one being who it was that wrote the source. In this case in was the 'Whites' who may or may not have altered what Pavel Medvedev said to suit them. The source also says that he was probably tortured this could alter the information he gave. Also the eyewitness himself maybe lying, this could be the case because he said in the interview that he was on the street when the tsar was shot. ...read more.


Source F shows a photograph of the basement in the Ipatiev house where the tsar was supposedly shot. The walls have bullet holes in them and the floor is blood stained. This shows that an act of violence had had defiantly taken place here. It is impossible to tell however whether or not it was the murder of the tsar and his family just by looking at the picture, we can only assume this by the information given in other source such as when sergeyev says "were shot in the Ipatiev House" [source A]. As a source it does not help us to answer key questions like who was murdered, who the murderers were and when they were murdered. ...read more.


Source H is could also be seen as biased as Judge Sokolov was also a Tsarist and appointed by the 'Whites'. The information given in the source however does not give any indication of being one sided. Sources F, G and H agree on many facts. They all show that there is a door in the right hand corner of the room. Also sources G and H both show that guards surrounding the Romanov family backing them against the far wall, This information would fit in with source f and explain the blood stained wall and bullet holes. None of the sources on there own would be particularly useful but used in conjunction with each other and other source a historian would could find them invaluable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    There was also a high level of unemployment. This was the period that culminated over two decades of Communist Party- led popular struggle. Mao is sometimes referred to as the "Four Greats": "Great Teacher", "Great Leader", "Great supreme commander" and "Great Helmsman".

  2. Romanov Family Question F

    It is possible for both sources to be true, but yet highly unlikely because many people would not kill people separately, at different times and locations. Then bury some of the bodies in one place and bury some of the others in a different place.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    However two of the children Anastasia, and her brother; heir to the throne Alexei. It is also surprising because it was a local leader and was not a cover up.

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    'Walking into the room he saw all the members of the Tsar's family lying on the floor." I believe we must be cautious about this statement as Medvedev had a motive to try to distance him away from the killing thus in essence watching his won back..

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Stalin was a strong man, this I think is quite true as you have to be strong to remain a leader of such a huge country till you die, and achieve what he did. Other single details in this source are also true such as the name carving on machines

  2. What happened to the Romanovs?

    Trotsky later justified the killing of the Romanovs: "The execution of the tsar's family was needed not only to frighten, horrify and dishearten the enemy, but also to shake up our own ranks to show them that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either complete victory or ruin....."

  1. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    This is because the artist couldn't have possibly seen their exact facial expressions or how they were standing. The artist would have also wanted his painting to sell so had to make it seem dramatic and interesting and used exaggerated imagery to do this.

  2. russia: what happened to the romanov family question 1 and 2

    Sources C and A are both biased towards the whites. Sources A and B say that the Tsar and 4 others were shot in the house but the rest of the family were not. However source C says that the whole family was killed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work