• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

russia: what happened to the romanov family question C and D

Extracts from this document...


Russia what happened to the Romanov family Question C and D c) Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source D is an eyewitness account this does not necessarily make it reliable, there a number of factors to consider, one being who it was that wrote the source. In this case in was the 'Whites' who may or may not have altered what Pavel Medvedev said to suit them. The source also says that he was probably tortured this could alter the information he gave. Also the eyewitness himself maybe lying, this could be the case because he said in the interview that he was on the street when the tsar was shot. ...read more.


Source F shows a photograph of the basement in the Ipatiev house where the tsar was supposedly shot. The walls have bullet holes in them and the floor is blood stained. This shows that an act of violence had had defiantly taken place here. It is impossible to tell however whether or not it was the murder of the tsar and his family just by looking at the picture, we can only assume this by the information given in other source such as when sergeyev says "were shot in the Ipatiev House" [source A]. As a source it does not help us to answer key questions like who was murdered, who the murderers were and when they were murdered. ...read more.


Source H is could also be seen as biased as Judge Sokolov was also a Tsarist and appointed by the 'Whites'. The information given in the source however does not give any indication of being one sided. Sources F, G and H agree on many facts. They all show that there is a door in the right hand corner of the room. Also sources G and H both show that guards surrounding the Romanov family backing them against the far wall, This information would fit in with source f and explain the blood stained wall and bullet holes. None of the sources on there own would be particularly useful but used in conjunction with each other and other source a historian would could find them invaluable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    the Cultural Revolution set us back twenty years" Millions of students were sent to the countryside to work on the land - thus preventing the reemergence of the Red Guards. So chaotic was the situation that universities did not reopen until 1970.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Krushchev is being very careful not to anger any of Stalin's supporters. Like Stalin, Krushchev was a strict leader but both were not on the same scale. As his role in being second in command to Stalin, Krushchev knew him extremely well.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    in village squares, factories´┐Ż What a marvellous sight to see Putilovsky Zavod (the Putilov factory) pour out its forty thousand to listen to Social Democrats, Socialist Revolutionaries, Anarchists, anybody, whatever they had to say, as long as they would talk!

  2. Romanov Family Question F

    It is possible for both sources to be true, but yet highly unlikely because many people would not kill people separately, at different times and locations. Then bury some of the bodies in one place and bury some of the others in a different place.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    and could be trying to build up a strong answer for what happened at Ipatiev House. I would personally say that Source H is most useful to a historian, solely because it uses eyewitness accounts to create a diagram, and it was also published in a book.

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    I think that source C is more different than similar to source A and B as it has many exaggerations and unnecessary opinions in it. Source A and b are uncertain accounts whereas source C is certain of the outcome of the family (they were killed).

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    3) 'Pravda' was the communist party paper. Therefore we can not fully count on the reliability of source E which appeared in this paper, it is also biased. The published speech which source E is, could have been just part of Russian manipulation and propaganda. In fact it seems that way after reading it; the description of Stalin is very much exaggerated and "over the top".

  2. What happened to the Romanovs?

    They had to be finished off by stabbing them to death. The massacre was complete and the entire Romanov family was slaughtered. In an interview with Pavel Medvedev, these described events are supported. He was a Red Guard commander and this is the only eye-witness account from 1919.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work