• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sharpeville - massacre or self defence

Extracts from this document...


Do these sources prove that the South African Police force was justified and acting in self defence at Sharpeville? The events that happened at Sharpeville are, and probably will always be, undecided. We know that the South African Police shot the crowd, but we aren't sure whether it was justified and acting in self defence. Source C and H both back up this statement. Source C claims that the blacks attacked the police with weapons first including firearms and stoning. The statement was from the South African Embassy so they were backing up governemnt. Although they should be reliable and it was written at the time, they were not there at the scene. Source H also claims that the crowd were violent as "a crowd of several hundred Africans this afternoon began stoning the police armoured cars". But it also says that it was "after the shooting in the morning, in which one African was killed and another seriously wounded" which means it was after the incident so not actually relating to the incident. ...read more.


Since this is a photograph it captures a moment in time which shows that it did happen, but this only shows what the photographer wants to show. But know from knowledge that blacks were shot in the back. Source D also disagrees with the statement by saying that they were shot in the back - meaning they were running away, not fighting. Since this only states facts (no emotion or opinion) it could make the statement more reliable, but it wasn't written at the time and also his book 'against the world' might suggest that he was against the whites and therefore biased. It cross references with knowledge and source B that people were shot in the back. Source E is also against and clearly shows throughout the extract that the crowd weren't violent - "it was not a hostile crowd". Reeves was white and part of the Anglican Church, which was very anti-apartheid. ...read more.


His writing doesn't appear to be totally against the whites as he doesn't really put the blame completely on the Police force - "Later, Colenel Pienaar satted that he thought his order would frighten the crowd and that his men would uderstand that if they had to fire they would not fire more than five rounds" He also suggests that the police only followed suit to other policemen when firing. In conclusion, sources C, H and I agree with the statement that the police were acting in self defence, although none of them are very reliable as they all seemed prejudiced towards whites, although the same goes for sources B, D and E which disagreed with the statement as they seemed more for the blacks. This shows that we will probably not know if the police force were justified for attacking as the two sides of the argument are splitted in two too subjectively for there to be a definate answer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Forward Defence

    "All the Way with LBJ" was another example of the increasing relationship with the USA. The Vietnam War was growing increasingly unpopular in the USA and President Johnson needed support. Australia gave it that. In October 1966, President Johnson was the first American president to visit Australia and he valued Holt's loyalty and supported him.

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    De Klerk, meaning he acted on the intentions of fortifying his own reputation. The caption of the source mentions that the source is specifically presented for ?general readers? meaning the author would be keeping the text concise and coherent, offering only simplified and intriguing information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work