• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the Soviet Union make an agreement with Britain and France or with Germany?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should the Soviet Union make an agreement with Britain and France or with Germany? From: Comrade Ug Date: 10 August 1939 For: J.V. Stalin Dear comrade Stalin, I am writing this report to inform and advise you on the danger of war, and the possible outcomes, good and bad, that can come by allying the USSR to the fascist powers, or with the capitalist. It is imperative that the USSR makes the right decision immediately because while the Fascist powers of Europe, in particular Germany, grow stronger economically and militarily, and while Britain and France continually intimidate and ignore us, war looms and seems inevitable. As we currently stand there exists no way in which we would be able to defeat either the Fascist powers or Allies single-handedly, so it would be in the best interest of the USSR to strike an accord with the power that seems most likely to emerge victorious when the predestined war breaks out. The nature of this accord should heavily be militarily based, but would also include some aspects of economic benefits. ...read more.

Middle

Germany and this may hold against us in the future. This action of ours, although allowing us to gain a significant amount of expenditure in gold, may have aggravated all of the other powers in central Europe, and made them less willing to strike a deal with us. As I previously mentioned, we were not invited to the Munich conference by any of the powers even though it was our own Litvinov whom stressed the grave dangers lying in the future and the readiness of the Soviet government to join in a conference of the great powers to 'check the further development of aggression' - in particular Czechoslovakia. His proposal was rejected by the British government who to discuss only between Hitler and Daladier. France, who had a pact with the USSR to defend Czechoslovakia, remained quiet on this issue and this could be a potentially eye-opening event. In particular we learned that neither power, Fascist nor Allied, had any concern whatsoever for the views of the Soviet Peoples. There are many reasons why the USSR would benefit from an agreement with Britain and France. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thirdly, the Soviet armed forced had been hit by the purges and the rearmament programme was nowhere near completion. A pact would at least by the USSR more time. Furthermore, the USSR would gain half of Poland and a sphere of influence from Finland to Romania, including the Baltic States and an agreement would be in line with the Treaty of Rapallo and the good relations of 1922 to 1934. Moreover, Germany was still the USSR's major trading partner. On the other hand it would be an ideological somersault - a reversal of collective security against fascism. In conclusion, I would recommend that you, Comrade Stalin, attempt to initiate a pact with Germany simply because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages and also the competition. An agreement with Germany is more favourable because of our recent history of trading and cooperation - the complete opposite to our relationship to Britain and France, who did not have enough courtesy to invite us to the Munich conference, even though its political implications would affect us in arguably the severest way. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How effectively did the Soviet Union control Eastern Europe from 1945 to 1968?

    East Germans aired their grievances about wage cuts, but the Red army was called in to crush all uprising. 400 people were killed; Khrushchev was reverting back to Stalin's old methods, however people were not put off, as there are further problems in Hungary in 1956.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Kirov was one of those who not only believed in democracy within the Party but also believed that the Party gave democracy to the country as a whole - a democracy for the working class. Kirov also believed in class struggle, which allowed him to support Stalin's positions concerning industrialisation and the collectivisation of agriculture.

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    shafts being made, this shows that production could have risen even more. The government thought the first five0year plan would add on 800,000 workers to the industrial labour force of 3 and a half million, instead the workforce increased to 6.5 million.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    His officials controlled farming through fear so collectivisation was a success for the political aims of the party. This source is figures taken from a table on a website http://www.johndclare.net/Russ10.htm which links you to these figures on webarchive.org. So the motives of this source are questionable if they really are

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work