• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A, B and C are useful when finding out what the Battle of Dunkirk was like because they are three different accounts of a personal experience of Dunkirk.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lizzie Harrison Assignment 1: Model A2: The Battle of Dunkirk 1. Source A, B and C are useful when finding out what the Battle of Dunkirk was like because they are three different accounts of a personal experience of Dunkirk. The first source, source A is useful because it describes the evacuation of men from the beaches of Dunkirk back to Britain. The author of source A describes it as a "terrible night for there was hardly any army and the ones they did have were useless". This suggests that the situation was very disorganised as they would have been retreating from constant German attacks. The phrases "rabble" suggests disorganisation and "the odds and ends of an army" implies something rather dreadful has happened to the men. For example they may have been hit by German dive bombers and so consequently many troops have been split up from one another in the rush to retreat from the Germans and mixed with the French and Belgium. The source is written by Thomas Kerr who was one of the naval officers sent to organise the evacuation, so therefore he should know what was actually going on. ...read more.

Middle

This difference of opinion may be because Source B was written by a seaman, manning one of the boats from the minesweeper. This was a small boat rescuing people from the land to bigger boats. This was only one end of the beach and very close to it, further up the beach and further away there may have been less chaos and organisation. Source C describes one man opinion of another mans bravery during the evacuation of Dunkirk. According to the author an RASC sergeant was the "bravest man I ever saw". When the German Heinkel planes came back to attack, he "grabbed his gun and shot at them". This then tells us, that some men knew what they were doing and had some bravery and also some skill. The source also shows a sense of desperation and no organisation though when it describes the RASC sergeant "blazing away at the Germans". As it shows that there was panic and that he was lucky he had his gun to shoot at the Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore his opinion will be more reliable than the others as he was in a high up and respected position of the navy. Also he would therefore have had an overview of everything and had a better idea of the plans for the evacuation. What could make it even more reliable was if we had a German point of view in one of these sources, because they are all from British men therefore only have one country's point of view of it all. If there was a German point of view, the reader could learn about the evacuation from their knowledge and gain information as they may have had a different experience as they were the attackers. Although the sources are not useful because they are all only one mans opinion of the evacuation and it took place at only one place of the beach. For perhaps on another part of the beach they were lined up in columns with great organisation. Furthermore, this was only one moment out of the whole of the Battle which lasted from the 24th of May to the 4th June 1940, on other days it may have been worse or more unperturbed for the men. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    As the source says 'there must therefore be added 27,936 making the grand total of those evacuated by this date 366,162' this signifies additional military achievement for the British. We cannot however take all the source remarks at face value.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    This source is quite reliable because he had all the facts available to him. This book was written in 1990, which is after the event, therefore there is no need for propaganda. But on the hand he might have exaggerated the book for his market, e.g. older people to read.

  1. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    Therefore making the sources limited as you don't get the whole perspective of the evacuation of Dunkirk. Source B is useful because the cartoon shows us that many soldiers escaped and with different kinds of boats. However it is also limited because it is a secondary source and was under censorship.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the Battle for ...

    The other two sources seem to be fairer, and less biased. None were written from the perspective of a soldier, so we cannot find out anything about what the battle for Dunkirk was like. And from the position of a boat, you cannot accurately see anything on the beaches.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle of ...

    These weaknesses mean that the source is a little bit unhelpful in giving us an understanding of what happened at the battle of Dunkirk. Source C is an account given by a Cornish able seaman.

  2. Assignment 1: Model A2: The Battle of Dunkirk

    He felt that the army were being overly optimistic; according to the source the army had great faith in the navy, it inspired them to carry on and gave them a sense of hope. But Kerr genuinely felt that many men could not be rescued as they had a small and hopeless navy.

  1. Study Source B and C, which is more useful?

    The purpose of this source therefore is to convince people that evacuation ran smoothly. However, this is a government photograph, so we must consider it to be propaganda, and therefore biased. I know this because the children all seem to be happy to leave, and consequently shows that the government wants to present the "ideal" image of evacuation.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    been changed by source B16Overall, this interpretation is not valid because it appears to be heavily influenced by source B16, which was radio propaganda broadcasted in 1940 by a defect, which is then taken into account through source B9. Source B13 is a primary source photograph taken by a French photographer in June 1940.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work