• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows Stalin looking very smug at his achievements - mass murder. He is pointing at pyramids of skulls, with vultures on them, symbolising death and possibly him preying on the weak.

Extracts from this document...


1. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows Stalin looking very smug at his achievements - mass murder. He is pointing at pyramids of skulls, with vultures on them, symbolising death and possibly him preying on the weak. The purpose of this poster is to criticise the way Stalin rules - by fear. He is portrayed as a sick and twisted man who enjoys taking peoples lives. It has not been censored, so it shows peoples view of him - they are anti-Stalin. The caption written at the bottom written in French is translated into "Visit the Pyramids of Russia". This seems as if he is trying to bring tourists to Russia to show his 'achievements'. Source B is the complete opposite to source A. It is a painting of Stalin and workers at a new factory opened in the 1930s as a result of his five year plans taking place. Stalin is dressed in white and surrounded by happy, smiling workers. This source shows Stalin as an approachable man who is trustworthy. It has been censored to project Stalin's image as a caring man and the ideal leader, as his achievements will become a reality. Source C is similar to source B as it shows the image Stalin wants to project. It is a photograph of Stalin surrounded by army officers wives, congratulating him. ...read more.


Now Stalin is dead, he does not have to be afraid of what could happen to him. Khruschev knew Stalin well, so it is possible that he is portraying Stalin as trustworthy. The sources were both written in the same year, but are different. It is hard to say if they are reliable assessments of Stalin, but I am more inclined to believe khruschev's assessment of him. However, Khruschev does not talk of the 5 year plans and whether they were achieved, so he may want people to forget so they think he is a better leader. 5. Source I is an American cartoon, mocking Stalin's show trials. It suggests that the trials are a fraud. The trial is pre-determined, and the people in the dock are behaving ironically as they are laughing whilst admitting to being guilty. The purpose for this trial is to convince the soviet public of the guilt of the accused party, who will be executed as a result. This is a contrast to source J, as it shows France's perception of the show trials. The cartoon published in the late 1930s is not censored, so it shows what Stalin's show trials are like. It focuses on the pre-determined nature of the trial. Source J shows the trial being taken seriously, but all the men in the source look like Stalin, possibly illustrating that everyone shares his beliefs and would carry out the same actions. ...read more.


If we look at source K, the views we are given regarding his character are positive and different to other sources. Source D written by Stalin, gives us a sense that did indeed have a caring side for other people. We have seen many different sides to him. We cannot forget that these positive sources have been written by Stalin himself or Russians. Therefore, these sources cannot be reliable, leading to people disagreeing about Stalin's real character. If we look at the purges there has been arguments to whether they were or were not necessary. Many people argue that Stalin committed mass murder through the elimination of millions of innocent people, just to maintain his power over the country. If someone posed a threat, he simply killed them. It is difficult to know the truth about Stalin, the use of censoring and propaganda in the USSR. When he was in power, the sources came from the USSR, so the reliability is questionable. Sources that came out of France are also questionable, as they are mostly written by exiled Russians, who would have been bitter and therefore their accounts cannot be reliable. The sources convey that the disagreements were due to differing accounts during Stalin's time in power. Some portray him as a monster whereas some portray him as the hero. He did many amoral things but also a few good things for the USSR. He was a good politician and changed the USSR, but was also very paranoid and felt the need to kill anyone who posed to be a threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    This gave the people of Russia a 'father figure' to look up to and admire. Stalin altered history, changed photographs and had misleading pictures to make seem like the perfect leader. As I mentioned workers and mangers received awards for hard work, however Stalin controlled the people using fear, he

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    Stalin was willing to use whatever means necessary to achieve his goals. This resulted in parts of the Party opposed to Stalin's ideas being purged; he needed a free hand if his policies were to work. As Stalin tried to improve Russia, he also increasingly centralised the government.

  1. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    In my opinion, the Purges were a historical parallel to the methods used to stop the opposition to the 'collectivisation'. However, the 'collectivisation' methods were only small scale. I therefore judge that the treatment of opposition in the peasantry by Stalin during 'collectivisation' was a rehearsal for the purging of

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The speech talks about how Stalin was an inspiring leader. This could've been someone's opinion of Stalin but it is very strong and fanatical. The speech was put in a communist newspaper and Stalin was in control of the media which means Stalin would've seen the article before it was published.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    The industrial five year plans could not have been carried out without collectivisation. Even though at the beginning, the peasants could not handle the new machinery, in time soviet agriculture did become mechanized. By 1928, there were 100 tractors in USSR, under the NEP.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    The two sources are different in a sort that in source C Stalin shows his modest and in source A he is very proud of himself. Conversely, they both show that he is dealing with the Russian people. Another major difference is that source A is said to have been

  1. Stalin man or monster

    him from the image of aggression and killing normally associated with an army uniform, Setting is very calm sea trees sunny dies gives the impression of a peace loving and gentle man. This contradicts source A, which portrays Stalin as a cruel dictator.

  2. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930's a ...

    These were richer peasants and were called kulaks. This group in particular was very much against collectivisation. They felt that their hard work was being taken advantage of. However, many peasants, rich or poor, were against collectivisation. The land that Lenin had given them was now being taken away by Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work