• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows Stalin looking very smug at his achievements - mass murder. He is pointing at pyramids of skulls, with vultures on them, symbolising death and possibly him preying on the weak.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows Stalin looking very smug at his achievements - mass murder. He is pointing at pyramids of skulls, with vultures on them, symbolising death and possibly him preying on the weak. The purpose of this poster is to criticise the way Stalin rules - by fear. He is portrayed as a sick and twisted man who enjoys taking peoples lives. It has not been censored, so it shows peoples view of him - they are anti-Stalin. The caption written at the bottom written in French is translated into "Visit the Pyramids of Russia". This seems as if he is trying to bring tourists to Russia to show his 'achievements'. Source B is the complete opposite to source A. It is a painting of Stalin and workers at a new factory opened in the 1930s as a result of his five year plans taking place. Stalin is dressed in white and surrounded by happy, smiling workers. This source shows Stalin as an approachable man who is trustworthy. It has been censored to project Stalin's image as a caring man and the ideal leader, as his achievements will become a reality. Source C is similar to source B as it shows the image Stalin wants to project. It is a photograph of Stalin surrounded by army officers wives, congratulating him. ...read more.

Middle

Now Stalin is dead, he does not have to be afraid of what could happen to him. Khruschev knew Stalin well, so it is possible that he is portraying Stalin as trustworthy. The sources were both written in the same year, but are different. It is hard to say if they are reliable assessments of Stalin, but I am more inclined to believe khruschev's assessment of him. However, Khruschev does not talk of the 5 year plans and whether they were achieved, so he may want people to forget so they think he is a better leader. 5. Source I is an American cartoon, mocking Stalin's show trials. It suggests that the trials are a fraud. The trial is pre-determined, and the people in the dock are behaving ironically as they are laughing whilst admitting to being guilty. The purpose for this trial is to convince the soviet public of the guilt of the accused party, who will be executed as a result. This is a contrast to source J, as it shows France's perception of the show trials. The cartoon published in the late 1930s is not censored, so it shows what Stalin's show trials are like. It focuses on the pre-determined nature of the trial. Source J shows the trial being taken seriously, but all the men in the source look like Stalin, possibly illustrating that everyone shares his beliefs and would carry out the same actions. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we look at source K, the views we are given regarding his character are positive and different to other sources. Source D written by Stalin, gives us a sense that did indeed have a caring side for other people. We have seen many different sides to him. We cannot forget that these positive sources have been written by Stalin himself or Russians. Therefore, these sources cannot be reliable, leading to people disagreeing about Stalin's real character. If we look at the purges there has been arguments to whether they were or were not necessary. Many people argue that Stalin committed mass murder through the elimination of millions of innocent people, just to maintain his power over the country. If someone posed a threat, he simply killed them. It is difficult to know the truth about Stalin, the use of censoring and propaganda in the USSR. When he was in power, the sources came from the USSR, so the reliability is questionable. Sources that came out of France are also questionable, as they are mostly written by exiled Russians, who would have been bitter and therefore their accounts cannot be reliable. The sources convey that the disagreements were due to differing accounts during Stalin's time in power. Some portray him as a monster whereas some portray him as the hero. He did many amoral things but also a few good things for the USSR. He was a good politician and changed the USSR, but was also very paranoid and felt the need to kill anyone who posed to be a threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    During the second plan there were great increases in the electricity production, fertiliser production, for the first time, mining for copper, zinc and tin were undergone. Russia by 1937 was a developed country and was self-sufficient in metalworking, machine making country, there were substantial progress made in the production of energy, iron ore and metal industries.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Have the Chinese people been better off in each of these areas since the death of Mao? Explain your answer. The Cultural Revolution was not officially ended until 1977 but it had passed its worse excesses by 1972, and a balance of power between left wing and right, radicals and moderates was established.

  1. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930s a ...

    plan to develop the Soviet economy 'from an agrarian into a industrial one, capable by its own means of producing the necessary equipment.' It concentrated on raw materials and industry rather than goods. The Plan set targets for things such as industry, agriculture, railways, canals, trade, energy, housing, education and other public services.

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    This was beneficial as it allowed Stalin to make all of the decisions that he needed to make in order to achieve his policy of catching up with the west. The forced pace of industrialisation and the implementation of collective farming in order to achieve his economic aims required a disciplined workforce and a compliant peasantry.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    For example, although the production of oil did exceed its target of 19 million tons, the production of steel was nearly two million tons less than its predicted 8.3 million tons whereas pig iron production target was still two million tons more than the targeted 6.2 million.

  2. To what extent was Stalin personally responsible for the Purges of the USSR in ...

    For instance the effect that the purges had on the economy were that despite all the best workers/labours working in the labour camps, which was an exceedingly cheap source of labour, this resulted in unqualified workers not knowing how to fully operate the machinery left in the towns, which in turn lead to a low out put in productivity.

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    Stalin made ambitious targets for each region, state, factory, section, and individual in Russia to achieve. These were usually near impossible to meet, and resulted in heavy penalties and many factory managers and workers being murdered or sent to gulags by Stalin's Secret Police.

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Bukharin once worked closely with Stalin and so got to see both his good points and his bad points. Compare this with the writer of source E who appears to only see good in Stalin. The idea that Stalin always wanted to appear to be the best and was very

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work