• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that Judge Sergeyev investigated the murder of the Romanov family.

Extracts from this document...


What happened to the Romanov family? A. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that Judge Sergeyev investigated the murder of the Romanov family. However as Sergeyev was sacked perhaps he had not written his report biased enough so reliable information may be found in the source. The whites would have wanted it to seem like the whole Romanov family was brutally murdered but the report suggests otherwise. This source believes there was a murder, and it happened in the lower storey of the building. Sergeyev believes that not all the members of the household were shot there, he believes "the Tsar, the family doctor, the two servants and the maid were all shot in the Ipatiev house", however does believe that the "Empress, the Tsar's son and four other children" were not shot there. It is important not to take this source too literally as this is not necessarily what Sergeyev himself said, but what the journalist concluded after speaking with him. Source B, however seems much more interesting, it is a report by Sir Charles Eliot to the British Government. This source is very sceptical about the events; how Judge Sergeyev showed Sir Charles Elliot to the room that the murder was supposed to have taken place. "The position of the bullets indicates that the victims had been shot while kneeling and that other shots had been fired into them when they had fallen on the floor." ...read more.


This would contradict what he had said in source D as he claimed he had been sent out whereas his wife claims that he was present and that he did participate in the murder of the Tsar and most likely his family. Therefore, this backs up my prediction of Medvedev trying to distance himself and thus he is less reliable. D. Source F is a photograph of the basement where the murders are claimed to have taken place. Source F does help us understand what went on because it does confirm that murders took place and that it was a large-scale massacre, we can tell this from the damage and destruction left of the walls and the floor, It gives the location of the murder. Sources A, B, C, D and G all agree that the Romanov family were killed in the basement. However, on its own this source could not tell us exactly who was killed and how many people were killed. Nor can it give us an insight into what happened before the killing i.e. what was said etc. I cannot tell us if there were any survivors and if any, where they went, also it does not show the rest of the room, as there is a possibility that the rest of the walls were in a similar state. I believe source G is useful to Historians as it is based on the investigation carried out by the whites i.e. ...read more.


The lorry then became stuck in a swamp travelling to there next destination and that is where it has remained. Source J does not specify how many bodies were found, but can positively identify five of the seven members of the royal family. The strange thing is that it does not mention Alexis being killed which I find strange as if they wanted to end the royal family reign, they need to the kill the Tsar and the heir i.e. Alexis. Source A is an account from an American newspaper and believes "that the Tsar, the family doctor, two servants and the maid" were all murdered. Source J confirms that the Tsar was killed as his corpse was found and positively identified. However, it does not agree that the Tsarina and three of her daughters were shot. We can presume that there were only five corpses found which are listed above. Source A just states who Sergeyev thought was murdered, however doe not describe any 'events' that might have happened after the killing, thus it does not mention where the corpses were taken. Source B is a report from Sir Charles Elliot, confirms there was a murder, and believes the people murdered were the same people mentioned in source A. This is not surprising as both sources were interpretations of what Sergeyev said. It disapproves source J as it says that only "the Tsar, Dr Botkin, the Empress's maid and two servants" were killed, therefore it disagrees as it is saying that the Tsarina and three of her daughters were not killed, which is not true as there bodies were found. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    to help build Chinese industry, and thousands were sent to the Soviet Union for education and training. Beijing's first five-year plan began in 1953 and was patterned after the Soviet five-year plans. It included the goals of socialist industrialization and the socialist transformation of agriculture, light and heavy industry, and commerce, all in successive phases.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Source K is the last source that supports Stalin. This was part of a biography of Stalin and it was written in 1947. Stalin was still alive at this point, and people wouldn't dare to write anything bad about Stalin, being aware of what happens at show trials.

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Source G is an explanation by Krushchev of how Stalin acted and his policies and ideoligies on varying issues. Krushchev states that by using "terror" and "executions", Stalin believed that this was the only way to enforce Communism throughout Russia.

  2. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    Further more the integrity of Judge Sokolov is also questionable as he was on the Reds side, and may want to give the public false information to mislead them, in favour of the Reds. There is no hint of who the witnesses are so his diagram loses even more credibility.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    were responsible of pulling Russia out of the war leaving the burden and responsibility of fighting against Germany just on the Allies - Britain, France and USA leading to an increased loss of army of these countries especially America's. For this reason, the American newspaper New York Tribune may have

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    In fact by cross referencing the information in both sources it is evident that the information is not consistent throughout all accounts of what happened to the Romanov family and as such sources A and B are not necessarily reliable.

  1. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    In addition, the production figures for pig iron, steel and cotton fabrics show over a 90% decline over the same period, which could mean serious and severe economic decline and widespread hardship. The 74% cut in production of electricity may be owing to a decline either in coal supplies or coal production, or perhaps a decline in demand.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    The author of this speech could really believe in what he is saying, people were being brainwashed and indoctrinated all the time, leading to a belief that is expressed in the speech. Due to the heavy propaganda thousands of people actually truly believed in Stalin's greatness and that he is an inspired leader as we read in the source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work