• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that Judge Sergeyev investigated the murder of the Romanov family.

Extracts from this document...


What happened to the Romanov family? A. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that Judge Sergeyev investigated the murder of the Romanov family. However as Sergeyev was sacked perhaps he had not written his report biased enough so reliable information may be found in the source. The whites would have wanted it to seem like the whole Romanov family was brutally murdered but the report suggests otherwise. This source believes there was a murder, and it happened in the lower storey of the building. Sergeyev believes that not all the members of the household were shot there, he believes "the Tsar, the family doctor, the two servants and the maid were all shot in the Ipatiev house", however does believe that the "Empress, the Tsar's son and four other children" were not shot there. It is important not to take this source too literally as this is not necessarily what Sergeyev himself said, but what the journalist concluded after speaking with him. Source B, however seems much more interesting, it is a report by Sir Charles Eliot to the British Government. This source is very sceptical about the events; how Judge Sergeyev showed Sir Charles Elliot to the room that the murder was supposed to have taken place. "The position of the bullets indicates that the victims had been shot while kneeling and that other shots had been fired into them when they had fallen on the floor." ...read more.


This would contradict what he had said in source D as he claimed he had been sent out whereas his wife claims that he was present and that he did participate in the murder of the Tsar and most likely his family. Therefore, this backs up my prediction of Medvedev trying to distance himself and thus he is less reliable. D. Source F is a photograph of the basement where the murders are claimed to have taken place. Source F does help us understand what went on because it does confirm that murders took place and that it was a large-scale massacre, we can tell this from the damage and destruction left of the walls and the floor, It gives the location of the murder. Sources A, B, C, D and G all agree that the Romanov family were killed in the basement. However, on its own this source could not tell us exactly who was killed and how many people were killed. Nor can it give us an insight into what happened before the killing i.e. what was said etc. I cannot tell us if there were any survivors and if any, where they went, also it does not show the rest of the room, as there is a possibility that the rest of the walls were in a similar state. I believe source G is useful to Historians as it is based on the investigation carried out by the whites i.e. ...read more.


The lorry then became stuck in a swamp travelling to there next destination and that is where it has remained. Source J does not specify how many bodies were found, but can positively identify five of the seven members of the royal family. The strange thing is that it does not mention Alexis being killed which I find strange as if they wanted to end the royal family reign, they need to the kill the Tsar and the heir i.e. Alexis. Source A is an account from an American newspaper and believes "that the Tsar, the family doctor, two servants and the maid" were all murdered. Source J confirms that the Tsar was killed as his corpse was found and positively identified. However, it does not agree that the Tsarina and three of her daughters were shot. We can presume that there were only five corpses found which are listed above. Source A just states who Sergeyev thought was murdered, however doe not describe any 'events' that might have happened after the killing, thus it does not mention where the corpses were taken. Source B is a report from Sir Charles Elliot, confirms there was a murder, and believes the people murdered were the same people mentioned in source A. This is not surprising as both sources were interpretations of what Sergeyev said. It disapproves source J as it says that only "the Tsar, Dr Botkin, the Empress's maid and two servants" were killed, therefore it disagrees as it is saying that the Tsarina and three of her daughters were not killed, which is not true as there bodies were found. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family

    It also clearly states that 'his wife and son have been sent off to a secure place.' This is unusual because his son Alexei was the heir to throne, and keeping him alive would mean that he could possibly be hidden in secret and then years later regain his throne.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    western ideas Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in the source and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. The purpose and the intensions of why Mao lunched the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution is unclear. The Cultural Revolution was an attempt to bring China forward as a unite country along and with great strength of the country.

  1. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    The October manifesto was a "con" trick by Nicholas to get the Russian people to call off the general strike. Nicholas's "strategy" from 1906 to the outbreak of war to 1914 was based on the following strategies: * To introduce laws which would make the duma a weak parliament *

  2. Victor Hugo gives us an epic tale of sacrifice and duty in his novel ...

    Hugo shows this mentality throughout the novel in Cimourdain's rhetoric: What tumor can be removed without involving a loss of blood? What fire can be extinguished without requiring a part of the fire? These terrible necessities are the very condition of success.

  1. Stalin - Source based work

    It has never been clear who was behind the killing but it has been suggested that Stalin may have been involved. In any case Stalin used the event as an excuse to get rid of his opponents. In the first stage only minor figures were arrested and imprisoned, but in

  2. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness ...

    It is known that farm production suffered owing to farmhands leaving for cities and also enlisting as soldiers. Further, it is known that the Russian war machine was hampered by poor supplies. The war created severe hardships, many fatherless families, which the photograph may perhaps suggest, and reduced markets as it dragged on.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    He was a victim of Stalin's purges in 1938. The words used are very strong and one would wonder how much truth is there and how much anger and seeking revenge. As well the author is speaking not in Russia but in Paris where he has nothing to fear; and probably wants to turn people against Stalin in his revenge.

  2. Which of these Sources is most useful to an Historian studying the deaths of ...

    Therefore as this painting is based on an unreliable source, it would not be useful to the historian as it is not accurate. Also the fact that it is a painting makes it unreliable and therefore unuseful to the historian as the painting is only the interpretation of the artist and not what actually happened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work