• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based questions on Haig.

Extracts from this document...


Question A Q. Study sources A and B. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? A. Source A is written by General Haig himself, so it is a reliable source to a certain extent. Where Haig says: 'The nation must be taught to bear losses', you can see that he expects a lot of men to die. Haig famously said, 'not even a rat would be alive'. At about half past seven on the morning of July 1st the British and French soldiers were ordered to go over the top, they didn't however duck and run. They marched slowly, upright exposing their chests to the hail of bullets that were about to come their way. They were Haig's orders. The Germans were ready for this attack, and had known about it for a good time, so had prepared themselves accordingly, digging large trenches, and lowering their machine guns on pulleys. ...read more.


All went like clockwork.' But his sub-ordinate officers were feeding him false information, telling him that the allies were doing better than they actually were, because his men were scared of him. It could be said that he didn't care about the lives of his men, but seeing that he was being fed false information about their well beings, he did not feel it necessary to stop the battle, as he believed they were doing well. So in some ways he did care about the lives of his men, but in some ways he did not. Question B Q. Study sources B and C. Which one of these sources do you trust more? A. Source B is written by General Haig himself, so it would be thought that this source is fairly believable. But Haig was not anywhere near the battlefield, so would not have been able to see the real goings on. ...read more.


So a lot of the barbed wire wasn't cut at all, meaning that the battle wouldn't go as well as planned. But even if Haig knew that he was being fed false information, he would still have needed to speak in positive terms because he was the General, so he needed to keep the morale of his troops high, so he needed to be believed by them. Source C is more believable than source because it was spoken by a soldier who witnessed the battle from the frontlines first hand, Private George Coppard. Coppard states: 'Quite as many died on the enemy wire as on the ground. It was clear that there were no gaps in the wire at the time of the attack.' I believe that Haig's thoughts on the barbed wire in source B were false because the source from Private George Coppard is more believable. However, like Haig's, Coppard's was only one view from the battle point, and there will have been many different viewpoints from many different soldiers. James Faux, History coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Britain And The Western Front - Sources Questions

    all the enemy in the German trenches had failed to achieve either of its objectives (sources J and K) because the enemy had hidden in underground bunkers and artillery fire doesn't destroy barbed wire. The first wave went over the top bearing all its equipment (source M)

  2. Evacuation during WWII - source based questions.

    Whereas Source B is a photograph, and so only captures a split second of time, and the emotion is not the true emotion, it is more a pose for the camera. (2) Source G is an extract from the World War Two based novel Carrie's War, written by Nina Bowden in 1973.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    The sources are the opposite of what we perhaps would have expected. The situation is rather paradoxical since the man is giving a slightly more tolerant opinion, whereas the woman is completely in opposition of the cause, which is meant to help her own sex.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    Source E was written on the 9th of September 1916. This was also the month in which the tank was first used. This therefore could also be the reason why Hankey has been sent out, and why the source describes so many German prisoners.

  1. Field Marshall Haig - Source based Questions.

    gun points wiping out the allied soldiers as soon as they came into sight and very little territory was taken on the first day. The source C extract was written by a private expressing his views on the attack. It shows that he probably knew that the pre-bombardment would not

  2. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    This does not give an accurate account of the whole line but it can tell us how bad it was in some places along the line. George Coppard could have been influenced by public opinion at the time, which would have swayed his opinions.

  1. Evacuation in Britain Sources Questions

    Also, if the photograph was propaganda from the Government, the people in it could have been made to smile. Source B only becomes useful if you interpret it in the way that it was meant to be interpreted, that it was a photograph of evacuees walking to the station.

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Firstly Private George Coppard would have had first hand experience in the front line at the trenches. Haig on the other hand wouldn't have had this sort of experience. Because of this, I am assuming that when he says, "the barbed wire has never been so well cut", he has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work