• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based questions on Stalin.

Extracts from this document...


Q.A These sources all give different impressions of Stalin. They were all created around the same time (1930's). Source A is a cartoon, which was published in France. It shows Stalin looking upon heaps of skulls, which represent the results of his policies, looking rather proud and unaffected by this. Giving the impression that he is evil and has no remorse of these deaths that he caused. According to the cartoonist Stalin's policies murdered thousands of people but if the artist was French, which he most probably was because of its place of publishing, then this could be a one sided piece of evidence because France thought communism was a terrible way of life. Despite the humour and propaganda in this source it does make a good statement; Stalin did cause a huge amount of deaths under his dictatorship and this source shows that. ...read more.


in source B; it also shows a softer image and shows that he is considerate and grateful for what they have done. This photo proves that Stalin was a much-loved leader and was looked up to by the civilians. Source B and C are different in content but both have similar impressions and are probably different to A because they had to be approved by Stalin himself. Source A is the odd source out because Source A only describes the results of his policies and not his popularity with the people, therefore not contradicting source B and C because they portray different ideas. But in spite of this, Source A, B and C all show that Stalin is the decision-maker and the centre of attention. Q.B This source was written by Stalin so is most probably biased to give him a good image of being a caring and compassionate man. ...read more.


The source shows an ulterior motive as well because he writes "it seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people is the same attitude I met in far off Siberia". Here he is trying to make the impression that other Russian leaders do not respect the life of the Russian people whereas he does. This to me proves why he wrote this article which has no documented proof of its actual occurrence. Stalin not only wrote this source because it shows him as a leader who is communicating with his public but he wrote it to alleviate his cruel image to the public. In addition to this he wanted to look more compassionate than other leaders at the time. This source is very beneficial to a historian because it demonstrates how he will go to any means to look better than he really is and to make other leaders look incompetent. Username : OBIOZOCI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    This meant that all the soldiers that were gone in the war would be back and would help the Tsar to crush the Revolution. One more reason was that he arrested all the leader of the Revolution parties and exiled them to Siberia.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    However, he doesn't specifically say that it is his fault, or that it is not his fault, he only says what Stalin considered right. Source H is much more extreme, as it directly attacks Stalin.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    In addition to this, Britain also sent troops to help the whites and many died, again another reason to be bias. B) Sources A & B were using evidence from Judge Sergeyev's investigation, source C however is using information from the investigations of another, Judge Sokolov.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    By 1983, more information could've been discovered or opinions could have changed. This could be as to why the sources are slightly different. In conclusion, both sources agree that Stalin had a dark, evil side and wasn't a good person.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    people and thus he uses this to reinstate that he was not an oppressor, but was a true communist. Reading the source it is clear that there is ambiguity and a double meaning behind it and could be referred to an allegory where moral and conscience issues are embedded deep into the source.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    In my opinion, the source is an unreliable account. From all the cruel actions of the Red Guards he would have to dislike them and not become one himself. 4. Study source D and E Do you agree that the message of these two cartoons is the same? Explain your answer.

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    Bukharin tells us that Stalin has always to be the best and anyone that becomes better must then die. Bukharin knew what Lenin really thought of Stalin, as he was friends with Lenin and responsible for the NEP, this surely scared Stalin.

  2. Russia - source based research.

    the tsar and the government did act then there would be a lot of trouble. 4. I disagree completely with the view, that there was widespread support in Russia for the tsar before the 1914. Not only does nearly all the sources disagrees with the view but it clear that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work