• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based questions on Stalin.

Extracts from this document...


Q.A These sources all give different impressions of Stalin. They were all created around the same time (1930's). Source A is a cartoon, which was published in France. It shows Stalin looking upon heaps of skulls, which represent the results of his policies, looking rather proud and unaffected by this. Giving the impression that he is evil and has no remorse of these deaths that he caused. According to the cartoonist Stalin's policies murdered thousands of people but if the artist was French, which he most probably was because of its place of publishing, then this could be a one sided piece of evidence because France thought communism was a terrible way of life. Despite the humour and propaganda in this source it does make a good statement; Stalin did cause a huge amount of deaths under his dictatorship and this source shows that. ...read more.


in source B; it also shows a softer image and shows that he is considerate and grateful for what they have done. This photo proves that Stalin was a much-loved leader and was looked up to by the civilians. Source B and C are different in content but both have similar impressions and are probably different to A because they had to be approved by Stalin himself. Source A is the odd source out because Source A only describes the results of his policies and not his popularity with the people, therefore not contradicting source B and C because they portray different ideas. But in spite of this, Source A, B and C all show that Stalin is the decision-maker and the centre of attention. Q.B This source was written by Stalin so is most probably biased to give him a good image of being a caring and compassionate man. ...read more.


The source shows an ulterior motive as well because he writes "it seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people is the same attitude I met in far off Siberia". Here he is trying to make the impression that other Russian leaders do not respect the life of the Russian people whereas he does. This to me proves why he wrote this article which has no documented proof of its actual occurrence. Stalin not only wrote this source because it shows him as a leader who is communicating with his public but he wrote it to alleviate his cruel image to the public. In addition to this he wanted to look more compassionate than other leaders at the time. This source is very beneficial to a historian because it demonstrates how he will go to any means to look better than he really is and to make other leaders look incompetent. Username : OBIOZOCI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    This meant that all the soldiers that were gone in the war would be back and would help the Tsar to crush the Revolution. One more reason was that he arrested all the leader of the Revolution parties and exiled them to Siberia.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Here we could say that Stalin has a sense of self awareness and understands the evil and suffering people go through and the difference between right and wrong. This understanding could be reflected in his good education. He was a strong believer of equality.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Bukharin clearly hated Stalin at this point. We can tell this from the source where it says, "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man- no not a man, but a devil". He thought Stalin was a paranoid horrible man who thought he was better than everyone else, "Stalin is unhappy at

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    the reader to sympathise and understand that he has been through an unpleasant life. He goes on to say that when 30 men went to the river to carry out a timber and returned with just 29. It is important to note that he uses the word 'comrade', this is a communist word for brother.

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    The only reason many people put up with the conditions was because they had no other choice and were thinking to themselves that everything would be alright the next day, even though they knew it was unlikely. It was in truth their only hope and gave them an incentive to work towards.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    In it Stalin is shaking the hands of the wives of army officers, congratulating them. He is smiling and the women want to shake his hand indicating that the women do not see him as some sort of 'evil tyrant'.

  1. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    it is source A which portrays Stalin as a brutal murderer, which is closer to the truth than sources B and C, which falsely portray Stalin as a kind-hearted, respectable and popular man. 2. Study Source D. Does it provide any useful evidence about Stalin?

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Also putting dough on the reliability of the source is the nature of the source. A white Russian writes it in note form. Because it is not written verbatim, it is not possible to know if it is exactly what Pavel Medvedev was trying to say, but merely a interpretation of what he was saying.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work