• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based questions on Stalin.

Extracts from this document...


Q.A These sources all give different impressions of Stalin. They were all created around the same time (1930's). Source A is a cartoon, which was published in France. It shows Stalin looking upon heaps of skulls, which represent the results of his policies, looking rather proud and unaffected by this. Giving the impression that he is evil and has no remorse of these deaths that he caused. According to the cartoonist Stalin's policies murdered thousands of people but if the artist was French, which he most probably was because of its place of publishing, then this could be a one sided piece of evidence because France thought communism was a terrible way of life. Despite the humour and propaganda in this source it does make a good statement; Stalin did cause a huge amount of deaths under his dictatorship and this source shows that. ...read more.


in source B; it also shows a softer image and shows that he is considerate and grateful for what they have done. This photo proves that Stalin was a much-loved leader and was looked up to by the civilians. Source B and C are different in content but both have similar impressions and are probably different to A because they had to be approved by Stalin himself. Source A is the odd source out because Source A only describes the results of his policies and not his popularity with the people, therefore not contradicting source B and C because they portray different ideas. But in spite of this, Source A, B and C all show that Stalin is the decision-maker and the centre of attention. Q.B This source was written by Stalin so is most probably biased to give him a good image of being a caring and compassionate man. ...read more.


The source shows an ulterior motive as well because he writes "it seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people is the same attitude I met in far off Siberia". Here he is trying to make the impression that other Russian leaders do not respect the life of the Russian people whereas he does. This to me proves why he wrote this article which has no documented proof of its actual occurrence. Stalin not only wrote this source because it shows him as a leader who is communicating with his public but he wrote it to alleviate his cruel image to the public. In addition to this he wanted to look more compassionate than other leaders at the time. This source is very beneficial to a historian because it demonstrates how he will go to any means to look better than he really is and to make other leaders look incompetent. Username : OBIOZOCI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    It presents the power and the sense of leadership that Mao had over China and his opponents. The cartoon of the Red Guards hitting Mao opponents conveys the idea of cruelty and uncivilized actions. The cartoons of the Red Guards behind show the support and the will to complete Mao's orders.

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    (One point 3 marks, two points 4 marks) 3-4 marks Level 3 You use you own knowledge to explain points in the source. 4-6 marks Level4 You do the same as for level 3 but you also explain other reasons from your own knowledge which are not in the source.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Just because his judgement was flawed did that make him a monster? We know Stalin certainly achieved a lot. When he took control the USSR was a shattered nation that needed to rebuild. The five-year plans helped in this. By the Second World War Russia was a modern superpower.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Some historians say that Stalin was mentally ill, but in this source, Khrushchev says, "we cannot say that these were the deeds of a mad despot". He doesn't say Stalin was mad, he thinks what he did was purely because he thought it was for the good of the country.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    In addition to this, Britain also sent troops to help the whites and many died, again another reason to be bias. B) Sources A & B were using evidence from Judge Sergeyev's investigation, source C however is using information from the investigations of another, Judge Sokolov.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    By showing that he cares for every man in the source he shows how manipulative he really was. Stalin uses the source to manipulate the USSR into thinking that he is in fact a person that cares for every man.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    workers to motivate people to cooperate with Stalin's policies this source is showing as one of his policies which is the five year plans to promote cult and worship of Stalin. Also analysing source B carefully there is a clear contradiction to the workers being happy and supporting Stalin because

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    People would have to live off scraps and lived in poor housing. To add to that, the air around them was heavily polluted and there was no coal or wood to start fired.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work