• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based work on Prohibition.

Extracts from this document...


Prohibition Question F Some of sources A to J do not suggest an inevitable failure of Prohibition where as some of them you cannot use as evidence because they were published after or during Prohibition. I think that sources A, B, E, I and J all suggest that Prohibition was inevitably going to fail where as sources C, D, F, G and H all do not suggest that inevitably Prohibition was going to fail. Source A is a historian talking about Prohibition in 1973. It says firstly about the causes of Prohibition, which make it seem that Prohibition was not going to fail. By saying things like 'The bad influence of saloons' and 'Most important of all was the moral fervour inspired by the War to Make The World Safe for Democracy'' make it sound that this article would have been strongly for the introduction of Prohibition. However in the second paragraph he uses hindsight to try and prove that it would have been inevitable with lines such as 'For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans.' ...read more.


The reason I feel that these two sources are supporting the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable is because if the public were going to still want alcohol, as stated in sources A and B, then the people still selling the alcohol are going to obviously do anything they can to avoid getting caught. If the people above the policemen, e.g. Prohibition Agents, are still wanting the alcohol like everyone else, then they will be bribed in order to get drink for themselves. Sources C and D are both posters supporting the fight against alcohol. They both give across the image that alcohol is destroying the American society and want it banned. These posters are intended to get the Prohibition law passed so they obviously don't think that Prohibition is going to fail. Source F is a speech in 1920 by John F. Kramer, the first Prohibition Commissioner who's job it was to enforce Prohibition. He says 'The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages.' This first sentence shows that he is fully committed to stopping the bad effects of alcohol. ...read more.


Through my own knowledge I know that before Prohibition was introduced there were already 23 out of 48 states were already 'dry' states and within these states most people obeyed the law and so would have been expected to around America. Also the fact that Rockefeller financed the Anti-Saloon League should also help to prove that Prohibition was not expected to fail and only with the benefit of hindsight can we see that there were already problems within the Prohibition law. Some of these were that they never employed enough Prohibition Agents to cover the whole of America, with each agent having to cover 2,000 square miles each. If these problems had of been seen before Prohibition was introduced then maybe it might have worked. In conclusion to this evidence I believe that not all of the sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable. Some of the evidence was, however, unreliable and some of the sources were written after the time of Prohibition so they have the benefit of hindsight. From my knowledge I would say that the failure of Prohibition was becoming more obvious over time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    It supports source A about the effects and consequences of having prohibition introduced and discusses the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and how they managed to put pressure on congress into introducing prohibition. The source also mentions how the gangsters used this ban to smuggle in alcohol.

  2. History - Prohibition

    Although in 1920, he says he will do his job properly, this was said before the rise of the gangsters and so he could have become corrupted by bribery as many commissioners and law enforcer were during the 1920s. We know that by the late 1920s, the bribery and terror tactics of gangsters had made the enforcement of Prohibition ineffective.

  1. Prohibition - source based questions.

    Source D is a photograph, which was taken in the 1920's and, has obviously been used by The Government, as propaganda; to prove that the 1500 prohibition agents hired to deal with illegal speak easy were successfully cracking on the illegal sale of alcohol.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    This suggests alcohol was in fact being manufactured even after Prohibition was enforced. Lastly, the provenance of the source must be taken into account when deciding whether to comply with the content of the source that suggests it is unreliable. John F. Kramer, the first Prohibition Commissioner, spoke source F.

  1. Prohibition - source based research.

    Is this not slavery?'. 4) Source D is published in 1931 as an advertisement to make 'Vinto Santo' - a grape drink. Nearing the end of the advertisement it tells you that you should consume the drink within 5 days or it may ferment and turn alcoholic.

  2. The U.S.A in the 20th Century "Gangsters and Prohibition" - source based

    By saying 'numbered only' this shows how there was a clear feeling that this was not enough to control the large amounts of illegal production of, and selling of alcohol. In Source C the expression on Uncle Sam's face is one of discontent, this could relate to Source D where it speaks of how little these prohibition agents were paid.

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    It says that in 1920 there were only 1,520 prohibition agents, who's salaries were only around $1,200 to $2,000, and that by 1930 there were only 2,836 being paid around $2,300 to $2,800. This shows that there were not enough agents being employed, and that those who were, were underpaid.

  2. Source work on prohibition

    The map was made after the event so it is secondary evidence, which would give the author, Martin Gilbert no reason to show a biased or one-sided opinion, as he would nothing to gain from it. So that would make it more reliable than some other sources that were produced during the time of prohibition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work