• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based work on Prohibition.

Extracts from this document...


Prohibition Question F Some of sources A to J do not suggest an inevitable failure of Prohibition where as some of them you cannot use as evidence because they were published after or during Prohibition. I think that sources A, B, E, I and J all suggest that Prohibition was inevitably going to fail where as sources C, D, F, G and H all do not suggest that inevitably Prohibition was going to fail. Source A is a historian talking about Prohibition in 1973. It says firstly about the causes of Prohibition, which make it seem that Prohibition was not going to fail. By saying things like 'The bad influence of saloons' and 'Most important of all was the moral fervour inspired by the War to Make The World Safe for Democracy'' make it sound that this article would have been strongly for the introduction of Prohibition. However in the second paragraph he uses hindsight to try and prove that it would have been inevitable with lines such as 'For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans.' ...read more.


The reason I feel that these two sources are supporting the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable is because if the public were going to still want alcohol, as stated in sources A and B, then the people still selling the alcohol are going to obviously do anything they can to avoid getting caught. If the people above the policemen, e.g. Prohibition Agents, are still wanting the alcohol like everyone else, then they will be bribed in order to get drink for themselves. Sources C and D are both posters supporting the fight against alcohol. They both give across the image that alcohol is destroying the American society and want it banned. These posters are intended to get the Prohibition law passed so they obviously don't think that Prohibition is going to fail. Source F is a speech in 1920 by John F. Kramer, the first Prohibition Commissioner who's job it was to enforce Prohibition. He says 'The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages.' This first sentence shows that he is fully committed to stopping the bad effects of alcohol. ...read more.


Through my own knowledge I know that before Prohibition was introduced there were already 23 out of 48 states were already 'dry' states and within these states most people obeyed the law and so would have been expected to around America. Also the fact that Rockefeller financed the Anti-Saloon League should also help to prove that Prohibition was not expected to fail and only with the benefit of hindsight can we see that there were already problems within the Prohibition law. Some of these were that they never employed enough Prohibition Agents to cover the whole of America, with each agent having to cover 2,000 square miles each. If these problems had of been seen before Prohibition was introduced then maybe it might have worked. In conclusion to this evidence I believe that not all of the sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable. Some of the evidence was, however, unreliable and some of the sources were written after the time of Prohibition so they have the benefit of hindsight. From my knowledge I would say that the failure of Prohibition was becoming more obvious over time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    It supports source A about the effects and consequences of having prohibition introduced and discusses the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and how they managed to put pressure on congress into introducing prohibition. The source also mentions how the gangsters used this ban to smuggle in alcohol.

  2. History - Prohibition

    It also only mentions arrests, not convictions. Some of those arrested could have been released without being convicted. It was difficult to get convictions because more senior officers and even judges were in the pay of criminals and so the number of arrests would be a more accurate measure than

  1. Prohibition - source based questions.

    Source C is a table showing the amount of drink offences in Philadelphia 1920-1925. Although source C shows that overall the amount of drinking offences have increased by 1925, the annual amount of disorderly conduct dropped by from 8,076 in 1923 to 5,522 in 1925.This shows that people were starting to take prohibition seriously.

  2. Prohibition - source based research.

    The fact that the police could tolerate an advertisement that tells you how to make an alcoholic drink says a lot. This source tells us that the cops weren't very strict when it came to the prohibition laws. I believe the source is reliable about attitudes because it is an advertisement and would not have over or under exaggerated.

  1. The U.S.A in the 20th Century "Gangsters and Prohibition" - source based

    of pure alcohol per person each year, and many religious and political leaders were beginning to see drunkenness as a national curse. But many working class men etc. did not share this view and were addicted to the liquor. So naturally there were those who exploited this need for alcohol.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    It describes how much better America is after prohibition, with "All liquor stains wiped from the stars and stripes". It goes on to talk of how saloons and their evils have been crushed, and how family life will be better with no alcohol.

  1. Source work on prohibition

    The map was made after the event so it is secondary evidence, which would give the author, Martin Gilbert no reason to show a biased or one-sided opinion, as he would nothing to gain from it. So that would make it more reliable than some other sources that were produced during the time of prohibition.

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    Reliable means which one somebody can trust. This could be a source or a person. Source E is quite a reliable source. This is because it is from a letter. This means that the writer, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., was writing to someone so he had nothing to hide as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work