• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source based work on Prohibition.

Extracts from this document...


Prohibition Question F Some of sources A to J do not suggest an inevitable failure of Prohibition where as some of them you cannot use as evidence because they were published after or during Prohibition. I think that sources A, B, E, I and J all suggest that Prohibition was inevitably going to fail where as sources C, D, F, G and H all do not suggest that inevitably Prohibition was going to fail. Source A is a historian talking about Prohibition in 1973. It says firstly about the causes of Prohibition, which make it seem that Prohibition was not going to fail. By saying things like 'The bad influence of saloons' and 'Most important of all was the moral fervour inspired by the War to Make The World Safe for Democracy'' make it sound that this article would have been strongly for the introduction of Prohibition. However in the second paragraph he uses hindsight to try and prove that it would have been inevitable with lines such as 'For no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans.' ...read more.


The reason I feel that these two sources are supporting the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable is because if the public were going to still want alcohol, as stated in sources A and B, then the people still selling the alcohol are going to obviously do anything they can to avoid getting caught. If the people above the policemen, e.g. Prohibition Agents, are still wanting the alcohol like everyone else, then they will be bribed in order to get drink for themselves. Sources C and D are both posters supporting the fight against alcohol. They both give across the image that alcohol is destroying the American society and want it banned. These posters are intended to get the Prohibition law passed so they obviously don't think that Prohibition is going to fail. Source F is a speech in 1920 by John F. Kramer, the first Prohibition Commissioner who's job it was to enforce Prohibition. He says 'The law will be obeyed in cities, large and small, and in villages.' This first sentence shows that he is fully committed to stopping the bad effects of alcohol. ...read more.


Through my own knowledge I know that before Prohibition was introduced there were already 23 out of 48 states were already 'dry' states and within these states most people obeyed the law and so would have been expected to around America. Also the fact that Rockefeller financed the Anti-Saloon League should also help to prove that Prohibition was not expected to fail and only with the benefit of hindsight can we see that there were already problems within the Prohibition law. Some of these were that they never employed enough Prohibition Agents to cover the whole of America, with each agent having to cover 2,000 square miles each. If these problems had of been seen before Prohibition was introduced then maybe it might have worked. In conclusion to this evidence I believe that not all of the sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable. Some of the evidence was, however, unreliable and some of the sources were written after the time of Prohibition so they have the benefit of hindsight. From my knowledge I would say that the failure of Prohibition was becoming more obvious over time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    It supports source A about the effects and consequences of having prohibition introduced and discusses the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and how they managed to put pressure on congress into introducing prohibition. The source also mentions how the gangsters used this ban to smuggle in alcohol.

  2. History - Prohibition

    Source B was taken from a book about American history, published in 1979. It supports Source A concerning the effects of Prohibition but only discusses the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and their successes in putting pressure on Congress to introduce Prohibition.

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    The reason for this is that it was not actually illegal to drink alcohol. This meant that people could get away with consuming alcohol. Another ways in which the law was flawed was that because of the share size of America it made it impossible to enforce it all over the country.

  2. Why was prohibition introduced

    Cars needed fuel to run on, Petrol, which led to a boom in companies such as "Esso Oil" which was owned by John D Rockefeller. Many companies could now afford to advertise their goods by advertising on T.V./radio; billboards etc.Advertising was seen to work because by 1929 four point nine million radios had been sold.

  1. Prohibition - source based questions.

    This had to exist in order for it to be prescribed by doctors and the church. It could be argued that prohibition was successful in meeting its aims. Source D is a photograph of a raid on a speakeasy and shows how the 1,500 prohibition agents were preventing illegal speakeasies.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    after prohibition has just been enforced, as the police forces would be arresting drunkards more than previously when prohibition wasn't a law. However, the fact that the number of prosecutions failed to drop after 5 years suggests that prohibition has unsuccessfully been enforced.

  1. The U.S.A in the 20th Century "Gangsters and Prohibition" - source based

    By saying 'numbered only' this shows how there was a clear feeling that this was not enough to control the large amounts of illegal production of, and selling of alcohol. In Source C the expression on Uncle Sam's face is one of discontent, this could relate to Source D where it speaks of how little these prohibition agents were paid.

  2. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    In conclusion, both of the artists are for prohibition and want men to stop drinking by emotionally blackmailing them. Also from the beginning of prohibition, the WCTU has been for prohibition. C) Study sources E and F Which of these sources is more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work