• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Source D, written by the British Journalist, is a more reliable account of the Reichstag Fire than source E written by the German, Rauschning." To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question One: Study sources D and E. "Source D, written by the British Journalist, is a more reliable account of the Reichstag Fire than source E written by the German, Rauschning." To what extent do you agree with this statement? I partly agree with this statement, as in source D, the British Journalist is repeating Hitler's exact words. The fact that these words were said while they were walking side by side indicates there was friendship between them, he was speaking to him as a companion. The only doubt in the reliability this source would be the fact that it was so strange for them to be friends as the journalist was British and Hitler was German. It maybe a genuine friendship or it could be Hitler's way of getting false information (propaganda) ...read more.

Middle

But, it was published outside of Germany, which could mean that it was the truth and because of the restrictions the Nazis put on the books that were published, it might have been all the truth, and the Nazis would not let it be published in Germany as they were scared people would find out the truth and they would look bad. In both these sources, it is evident that the author has had strong connections with Hitler either at present or in the past, but both at the time just after the Reichstag fire. They both agree on one thing, who Hitler believed was responsible for the fire. In source E, it is suggested that Hitler knew that it was the National Socialist leadership who were 'solely' responsible for the fire, that he Hitler had known of the plan and had approved of it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion Overall, I think source D is the most reliable source as it is Hitler himself speaking, it is his exact words as he spoke them, whereas in source E, it maybe true but there is also a possibility it is just idle gossip. Although these men were quite close to Hitler and high in rank, there is no significant proof that Hitler actually said this, it is just what these men say he said, There may be some truth in it, but if Hitler spoke them and they got passed on, it could've been done abet like Chinese whispers, where the truth was altered slightly, the truth twisted as each person was told. Because source D was written by a journalist, he could be very objective, so it is very reliable and as he is British, he was totally independent of the situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    He had only 196 seats in the Reichstag, which was only 20.4% of the whole seats. The communists have 100 seats, which was 16.9% of the whole Reichstag seats. Hitler had to have 50% of the seats if he wanted total control over Germany.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    This source says that the Nazis had no idea of this plan and that it was the work of Communists, which is similar to some of the views of Diels, making this source more reliable to use. In conclusion, I think that the account of the events in Source C

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    At the time it was published Communists where desperate for the support of their party. The Nazis who had blamed the fire on them were cleverly taking advantage of the situation, so the Communists needed to prove that the fire was not in fact their fault as Hitler alleged.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    The book that source D is extracted from is evidence that the Nazi party tried to take advantage of the situation in any way possible. As previously stated, this blatant propaganda was wrote to remove any existing blame from the Nazi party, and emplace it all on the Communists.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    When there was an emergency in Rome, the emperor and his leading followers had dictatorial powers, much as Hitler did in Germany. If the togas are a reference to that, then this point is neither for nor against the Nazis.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    that the events of Kristallnacht was not spontaneous, but in fact planned by the Nazis.

  1. History Sourcework - Do Sources D and E make it more or less likely, ...

    This description could have been written before kristallnact in which case it would have a higher chance of being true to the events that occurred, or after kristallnact it may have been written after kristallnact in which case hindsight and emotion may have influenced the description given here.

  2. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Diels also tried to take the edge off some of the Nazis bad name. Question 3: Source C is a piece of primary evidence from a British magazine showing Hindenburg talking to Hitler. Hindenburg is giving Hitler the chance to arrest any communists he wishes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work