"Source D, written by the British Journalist, is a more reliable account of the Reichstag Fire than source E written by the German, Rauschning." To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Authors Avatar

                                 Question One: Study sources D and E.

“Source D, written by the British Journalist, is a more reliable account of the Reichstag Fire than source E written by the German, Rauschning.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?

 I partly agree with this statement, as in source D, the British Journalist is repeating Hitler’s exact words. The fact that these words were said while they were walking side by side indicates there was friendship between them, he was speaking to him as a companion. The only doubt in the reliability this source would be the fact that it was so strange for them to be friends as the journalist was British and Hitler was German. It maybe a genuine friendship or it could be Hitler’s way of getting false information (propaganda) across to the British people. Or infact giving out false information which he would later deny ever saying if it looked like they could do damage to his status or posed a threat to what he was aiming to achieve.

Join now!

 Source E, at first, seems to be the most reliable source of information, but its not until you read that it was published outside of Germany, this shows us that the author of the source went from being at a position of authority at the top, socialising with the Nazis including Goering, Himmler and a number of other leaders in the Reich Chancellery, to being near the bottom, either a fallout or just a general leaving by choice has occurred. This means that if it was a fallout, the author, Hermann Rauschning, could’ve twisted the truth out of bitterness or ...

This is a preview of the whole essay