• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source H suggests that poor planning and Winston Churchill were responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli - Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D-J to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Source H suggests that poor planning and Winston Churchill were responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D-J to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer. Source H, the basis of this essay, is an extract from a GCSE book written by Cate Brett. Brett says that Gallipoli was a complete failure due, in part, to Churchill's involvement. She also blames the British in general for the lack of planning. Perhaps the theme is both about bad planning and also that there was not enough of even that. This source was written for a GCSE audience. Usually GCSE versions of the truth are far more simplified than the view and writing of historians. Therefore it is safe to assume that this source may either be not entirely accurate, or not very detailed. The author does not say whether she blame the British civilian leaders or military leaders. It does not say anything of the spirit of the soldiers, nor how the campaign went in relation to other battles including the stalemate on the western front. ...read more.


I am more inclined to believe Captain Fermer's account as he was actually there and describes the reasons behind the failures. The intended audience is not clear. Source E comprises of two accounts of the campaign written by two soldiers who fought at Gallipoli. The account was written sometime after the war and so perhaps feelings could have changed. The intended audience is not clear. The first soldier tells us that the whole campaign was a complete failure and although more than sufficient numbers of men were allocated to take the peninsula, the planning and communication was so bad that whilst 2000 soldiers were sitting around, just a few miles away their colleagues were being slaughtered. Clearly not enough intelligence was gathered beforehand. This soldiers places the blame squarely on the shoulders of the generals (presumably Churchill included although technically he was actually first lord of the admiralty, not a general) for a distinct lack of planning. This part does, indeed, fully support Brett's source H although source E does not specifically name Churchill. The second soldier merely remarks that the generals had neither prepared the assault, nor informed the soldiers of their plans. ...read more.


as he was in charge of the naval attacks and it was Ian Hamilton who was in charge of the land campaign, which was ordered with protest from Churchill. This source does not support source H because it is of little relevance. According to Brooman, Hamilton did not even have access to maps and no experience of amphibious landings, so this means that perhaps the blame of source H on Churchill should be shifted to Hamilton and his advisors. The quote underneath the map seems to have no link to the map. Lloyd George says, " Expeditions which are decided upon and organised and organised with insufficient care generally end disastrously." This is true, as Hamilton did not prepare enough for the Gallipoli campaign ending in disaster. The quote, however, was written before the campaign, which means that it holds little relevance to source H although it may show us that the civilian leaders wanted a planned assault and it was the military leaders that did not do it properly. The intended audience is not clear. Source G "From this map, I can see the strategic importance of the Dardenelles and therefore Winston Churchill was correct to attack the straights with the aim of bringing Russia back into the war" Alex Lawrence GCSE 2002/3 History Coursework Analytical November 2002 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    There was a problem though; the American's could not join the fighting at once. Their army was too small and needed to be built up. Weapons had to be made, men trained and ships built to transport the men across the Atlantic.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    2 - 3 years in Wales, and that the host wanted to adopt him. Another example of where evaluation was a success was from a rich host who says that her 6 male evacuees's made the war bearable and enjoyable.

  1. "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." AJP Taylor. Is there sufficient ...

    It could be deemed as propaganda. The painting shows troops waiting on a beach whilst ships of all sizes are trying to evacuate them whilst under air attack. The troops are being rescued in large numbers so shows it as a deliverance as lots of troops were saved.

  2. Why was it Important that the Gallipoli Campaign should succeed?

    to join the allies and allow troops though so another front can be opened up, Turkey had good geographical positioning and good resources so we needed to knock them out of the war so the Germans didn't have that advantage, the stale mate on the western front was effecting the

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    This source has a cartoon of the major General facing the sergeant - major with other military troops surrounding them. The speech underneath is of Major - general addressing the man before practice telling them that there are three essential differences from a real battle.

  2. The Gallipoli campaign in 1914 went down as one of the worst military failures ...

    Had some of these mistakes not been made there could have been a very different outcome of the Gallipoli campaign. A big part of the failure was the poor planning and the ill thought out plan created by Winston Churchill.

  1. Haig in sources

    Using the 2 sources and your own knowledge, to what extent did his predictions come true? From Sources D and E, I think Field Marshal Douglas Haig thought that the first of the Battle of the Somme would be a hard battle and a large death toll, but he thought his forces were ready to fight.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    On the other hand, the source is limited because Liddell Hart was invalided back to Britain in December which means he did not witness the whole war therefore we are not getting the whole picture of how leadership was. We can infer the source and say that the purpose of the source can somewhat make the source unreliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work