• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

Extracts from this document...


Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place? Noor Nanji South Hampstead High School Candidate No: 8216 Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place? (a) There is historical evidence to prove that Kristallnacht was a Nazi-organised event, not spontaneous rioting by ordinary Germans against the Jews, as the Nazis presented it. Thus, a historian would be more inclined towards Source A, which presents Kristallnacht as the former, rather than the latter, as represented by Source B. However, there are certain factors, indicating that perhaps Source B may be the more useful. Source A, a summary of an account written in 1954, is a secondary source, which immediately suggests its unimportance for a historian, because as it is not a direct quote from the account itself, the historian's summarisation might have somewhat distorted the truth, thus losing the source's reliability. The date of the account also causes us to doubt its significance; being written almost twenty years after Kristallnacht, Hesse's memory of the events cannot still be very clear in his mind. However, as it is written after the Nazi regime, there was no longer any need to lie for fear of angering the Nazis with the truth; consequently, the account is likely to be conveying the truth. Source B, directly quoted from a 'secret report', is a primary source, indicating its historical importance. As an internal Nazi party report, it was not for public viewing, and would hence supposedly not conceal the truth. ...read more.


Source F is clearly Anti-Nazi; similarly, the overall message of Source G is that the Nazi regime is attacking the nation; therefore, both sources convey the message that the Nazis are responsible for the ruins and desolation of Kristallnacht. However, the sources hold opposing views regarding whom is innocent in Germany. Source F is directing its commiseration towards the Jews, who are those lying dead in a heap on the floor; in contrast, Source G shows sympathy for the ordinary German citizens, who are powerless to stop the Nazis. (e) In Sources H and I, there is some analytical agreement when referring to the wasteful destruction of Kristallnacht, suggesting that Goering's account in Source H must have been truthful, for both sources to speak of it in the same way. This concurrence is found when Goering refers to how 'destroying so much Jewish property of economic value' was utterly unacceptable; this is supported by Hitler's claim that those responsible for the destruction had been 'like elephants in a china shop', giving an impression of the scale of the damage caused. Further similarities between the two sources are found when implying those responsible for causing Kristallnacht, because neither suggests that Hitler had officially organised it. However, in Source I, Hitler does not indicate who exactly was to blame, but just ambiguously says that 'the people responsible have destroyed everything', whereas in Source H, Goering is clearly placing the blame on Goebbels, and says that 'Hitler made some apologies for Goebbels', implying that Hitler, too, agreed that Goebbels was responsible for Kristallnacht. ...read more.


Sources A, C and E clearly contradict the above claim; they state that the Nazis were fully to blame for the events of Kristallnacht, and that 'most German people have nothing to do with these riots and burnings' (Source E). Source A endorses in this belief by noting that 'Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his thigh with enthusiasm' on hearing of the mass attack being planned against the Jews, thus demonstrating his obvious approval of the imminent events. However, one has to take into account that Source A is a secondary source, and thus the historian's summarisation might have somewhat distorted the truth. Furthermore, being written almost twenty years after Kristallnacht, Hesse's memory of the events cannot still be very clear in his mind. Source E has fewer limitations; being an anonymous note, the writer could not have been charged for expressing these opinions, and thus would not have needed to conceal the truth. Source C, too, obviously counters the above quote, by mocking the 'so-called "spontaneous" action', and insisting that the Nazis were to blame. This eyewitness, primary source is very reliable because a foreigner, who had no pressure on him from the Nazis on what he could say, would not have altered the truth. To reach a decision about whether 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' or not, we must explore the reliability of each source, and the message each is attempting to convey. After closely analysing these sources, it is possible to conclude that although Sources B and D evidently support the above claim, the majority of the sources are either indecisive, or resolutely against it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Night of the Long Knives take place?

    More than 200 Nazis were murdered that night, along with 50 of Hitler's own officers, such as R(hm, who was one of Hitler's closest friends. As an outcome of this event, Hitler was able to establish his dictatorship in Germany for several reasons, for example, it made the army loyal,

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    balance Source A is more useful in order to know the true course of events. (b) Source C is an account by David Buffman, the American Consul in Leipzig. Buffman was an American diplomat- his job was to be the eyes and ears of America in order to give America an impression of what was going on in Germany.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Jews after killing them or that time is running out for them in their regime of hatred towards Jews. It proves that the Nazi's had no heart and are very greedy. Overall, I think that this source clearly blames the Nazis for 'Kristallnacht' and not the German people.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Overall, Source D and E make it more likely that Source C is accurate. Source D does hint at blaming the people but it is unreliable so one cannot use it to strengthen or weaken the accuracy of another source because that source it most likely to contain wrong information.

  1. Nazi Germany: Why did Kristallnacht take place

    This obviously shows Hitler, Goebbels and the Nazis in a very bad light and there could be some reasons why he would do this. He could just be trying to show his opinion of the matter from what he had experienced or he could have been angry or disgusted with Hitler and the Nazis for various reasons.

  2. Nazi Germany - Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    public, but the source says that the public was horrified by the anti-Jewish behaviour displayed but could not broadcast the feeling because "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public caused fury amongst the Nazi's". Many of the Jews were sent to concentration camps "The most hideous

  1. How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, ...

    This puts across violent imagery and makes the story interesting. This source is reliable as it matches my own knowledge as on crystal night many people destroyed Jewish shops and synagogues. It also happened. The source is reliable as it matches my own knowledge on the events of kristallnacht; it

  2. Why And How Did Evacuation Take Place?

    Source 4 shows an area in London that has been bombed, there are destroyed houses, bricks on the ground. This helps to support the idea that evacuation had to take place because it was dangerous and children could have died if they never got evacuated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work