• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source L is an excerpt from a film. Is this reliable as evidence about the Blitz? Explain your answer using Source K and knowledge from your own studies.

Extracts from this document...


Ross McDonald History Coursework RWGO 27th December Question II. Source L is an excerpt from a film. Is this reliable as evidence about the Blitz? Explain your answer using Source K and knowledge from your own studies. [5marks] In order to assess the reliability of this source one will need to come to a conclusion as to what original effect this film was intended to have. The two possibilities open are, primarily, that Humphrey Jennings' film was simply a documentary to show those of a later era the impact of the German bombardment, or, the film was designed with the intention of raising the morale of the 'blitzed' Londoners. Either way it would appear that the argument will end in inconclusive fashion, as no one today truly understands Jennings' intentions. If one were to argue the case that this film was a historical documentary then the evidence for such is strong. Jennings has decided to be as accurate as possible, for, instead of casting actors in the roles as one may have expected to see had the film been made for commercial ...read more.


However, as I answered in question 1, source F is a form of propaganda common at the time, and, therefore it would be reasonable to assume that should these two other sources (L and B) conform to the same view then it may be possible to suggest that they too have links with propaganda. Having viewed source A, a photograph which was not published under the censorship laws (due to its representation of 'defeat' and 'carnage'), and compared it to source L it is clear that the only reason that I was a fireman was published was its portrayal of living at the time. This style however, is now under close scrutiny, as, had the mood been as it was represented in I was a fireman what would the need be for censorship? Another interesting observation is that the short film has a 'movie soundtrack' in it. This would have been very uncommon of the documentaries being filmed at the time, and therefore one has to ask whether the patriotic style music was included in a more subtle attempt to create an atmosphere common in many propaganda works of the era. ...read more.


With such a provenance, and the reliability inconclusive one may further enquire as to the usefulness of this source. Primarily it is useful to recall the styles, dialogue and equipment required to make a film of any kind during the war. This source is also useful for a historian who may be working in research of styles of propaganda. If one believes this source to be propaganda then it provides an insight into the way Jennings and others were stylise their work to maximise the results. Finally this source may be useful to a historian on the Blitz as it is an accurate source to show how the firemen dealt with fire and other situations. To conclude, there are many contradictory sources in the debate over the reliability of I was a fireman, and whichever one is believed will always cause controversy. However, in hindsight it is easy to say that this was a blatant attempt at propaganda by Humphrey Jennings, but I believe this source most reliable when in the context as quoted by the film guide, that 'this was a poetic documentary designed for the training of voluntary fire fighters but later released for public viewing'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    There is a lot of information about why the evacuation process was unorganised. Source 11 in the blue pamphlet tells us about the terrible and traumatising was in which evacuee's were picked to go with people. There were also a lot of problems with manners, habits and social mismatches.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success' - Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? ...

    it out to be, they would not need to use any sort of propaganda. From this point of view, these sources imply that evacuation was a failure. Sources C, E and F show three different perspectives of evacuation, but all three suggest failure.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    The number of children in the photograph is only a fraction of that figure but it does illustrate what was happening in other cities across the country and the photograph is therefore more than likely an accurate interpretation of evacuation.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why the Gallipoli ...

    The evidence that disagrees with the reasons why the campaign failed is that the source doesn't show the bad conditions and also it may give a false impression of the moral of the soldiers because it was written in 1916 so therefore it could be used as propaganda and as it's a cartoon it would be exaggerated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work