• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained?

Extracts from this document...


Question 1. Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained? Leon Trotsky wrote source A for his book 'The history of the Russian Revolution' in 1932. It is a short paragraph from the book explaining how the Russian army lost more men than any other country in the war. Source B was written by John Traynor for his book 'Europe 1890-1990' in 1991. The source is a simple table displaying Russian casualties and total mobilised units in the First World War. ...read more.


Other reasons include another form of mis-recording which was the number of deserters and men taken prisoner were recorded as deaths and so obviously these men could not really be counted as casualties. Unknown to some, Trotsky was a Bolsheviks and may have decided to over estimate the figures written in his book, to try and justify why the Bolsheviks took over and also to show how badly the Tsar did in commanding his armies. To uncover Trotsky further, he was commissar for war in Lenin's government in 1918. ...read more.


Some might argue that eighty-two years later, Traynor's figures could not be nearly as accurate as Trotky's. I agree with this to a certain extent but eighty-two years is plenty of time for new, more accurate figures to be uncovered and proven to be accurate. Over all, any figure can not be proven correct, as proper recordings were not taken. You can't really blame anyone for it because in a battle the last thing you need to do is to stick your head over the top of a trench and see who's been killed or injured. But the government should have tried to collect data in a more organised fashion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He was one of the only people Stalin trusted. I wouldn't say this source states Stalin was a complete monster but it leans more towards the monster category. Sources G and H are quite hard to analyse because they are both said by the same person but sort of contradict each other so they are not very reliable sources.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    inspirational and charismatic leader that led Russia out of the depths of despair to its current superpower status. Question 4 Sources G and H are both extracts from a speech made by Krushchev, who was addressing the Soviet Communist party in 1956.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The change in economy and industry was shown in 'Special Economic Zones', which were set up by Deng to enable China to get more contact with the outside world and benefit from foreign industry. One of these zones was set up next to the colony of Hong Kong; this was to bring China and the colony closer together.

  2. The First World War

    by army. Agricultural products were mainly sent to acting forces to support and feed Russian soldiers. Industrial production was also focused on war supplies giving about 80% of its production to the army.2 So the country itself was not supplied by products required for every day life: over two

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    She refers to Rasputin as 'our Friend' and also mentions how the information she is giving is 'based on what he dreamed in the night'. This shows the power he had and that even the most inferior things, which would be dismissed if anyone else had said it, has enlightened

  2. No other figure in recent Russian history has received the amount of vilification and ...

    Therefore, the father kept postponing the son's introduction in to the daily running of Russia. Not one person, most of all Alexander III, ever imagined that this young and inexperienced Romanov would ascend the throne as early in life as he did.

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    that of the Russian leaders, though Stalin proves to be a different leader. Stalin is trying to put across that he cares about his people, even after the millions of Russians he had murdered during his purges. This passage is similar to a parable, it has a moral meaning behind it.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    (This could be seen as deep irony) In other words he is trying to gain positive feelings from the people for himself alone. As well he could be trying to create a society that likes him and sees him as the only good leader, and also a society that is good to one another.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work