• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1. Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained? Leon Trotsky wrote source A for his book 'The history of the Russian Revolution' in 1932. It is a short paragraph from the book explaining how the Russian army lost more men than any other country in the war. Source B was written by John Traynor for his book 'Europe 1890-1990' in 1991. The source is a simple table displaying Russian casualties and total mobilised units in the First World War. ...read more.

Middle

Other reasons include another form of mis-recording which was the number of deserters and men taken prisoner were recorded as deaths and so obviously these men could not really be counted as casualties. Unknown to some, Trotsky was a Bolsheviks and may have decided to over estimate the figures written in his book, to try and justify why the Bolsheviks took over and also to show how badly the Tsar did in commanding his armies. To uncover Trotsky further, he was commissar for war in Lenin's government in 1918. ...read more.

Conclusion

Some might argue that eighty-two years later, Traynor's figures could not be nearly as accurate as Trotky's. I agree with this to a certain extent but eighty-two years is plenty of time for new, more accurate figures to be uncovered and proven to be accurate. Over all, any figure can not be proven correct, as proper recordings were not taken. You can't really blame anyone for it because in a battle the last thing you need to do is to stick your head over the top of a trench and see who's been killed or injured. But the government should have tried to collect data in a more organised fashion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    It is a speech made by a writer to the congress of Soviets in 1935.. Strong words are used, for example, "the men of all ages will call thy name, which is strong beautiful and wise", this is very "over the top".

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Source F is the more realistic view of Stalin. The reason why it is the most realistic is because Bukharin wrote it in the safety of Paris. This means that Bukharin could of told the whole truth without fear or retribution of attack by Stalin. The truth actually is that Stalin was a murderer but he was also an

  1. The First World War was decided by the outcome of trench warfare on the ...

    These innovations included rifled artillery and hydraulic recoil mechanisms, zigzag trenches, pillboxes and the tank, along with advances in the military and navy. Their application had the result of making it difficult or nearly impossible to cross defended ground. Britain obtained possession of these weapons and other warfare strategies and put them to use with the French 6.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Because not everything which others say is true, the majority being a series of rumours, this source can't fully be trusted. Above all, Source J can be considered as the most reliable and accurate source as it is a report from a British newspaper which mentions the use of modern

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    I believe this is because in fact judge Sergeyev was not harsh enough to the Reds as the whites would have hoped, in his report of what he believed happened to the Romanov family, and therefore his successor, Judge Sokolov would have had to be much more callous in portraying

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    This Stalin might want to achieve in order so people will be good and not rebellious and cause problems in the country Maybe not as important but the source also provides some useful evidence on Stalin and his background. We can learn from the source that Stalin is was in

  1. The First World War

    by army. Agricultural products were mainly sent to acting forces to support and feed Russian soldiers. Industrial production was also focused on war supplies giving about 80% of its production to the army.2 So the country itself was not supplied by products required for every day life: over two

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    Rasputin became famous due to his raunchy nature with women. He was also known for his ability to talk to God and help those who were sick and he first came in contact with the Tsar and his family when they needed help with their ill son Alexis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work