• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1. Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained? Leon Trotsky wrote source A for his book 'The history of the Russian Revolution' in 1932. It is a short paragraph from the book explaining how the Russian army lost more men than any other country in the war. Source B was written by John Traynor for his book 'Europe 1890-1990' in 1991. The source is a simple table displaying Russian casualties and total mobilised units in the First World War. ...read more.

Middle

Other reasons include another form of mis-recording which was the number of deserters and men taken prisoner were recorded as deaths and so obviously these men could not really be counted as casualties. Unknown to some, Trotsky was a Bolsheviks and may have decided to over estimate the figures written in his book, to try and justify why the Bolsheviks took over and also to show how badly the Tsar did in commanding his armies. To uncover Trotsky further, he was commissar for war in Lenin's government in 1918. ...read more.

Conclusion

Some might argue that eighty-two years later, Traynor's figures could not be nearly as accurate as Trotky's. I agree with this to a certain extent but eighty-two years is plenty of time for new, more accurate figures to be uncovered and proven to be accurate. Over all, any figure can not be proven correct, as proper recordings were not taken. You can't really blame anyone for it because in a battle the last thing you need to do is to stick your head over the top of a trench and see who's been killed or injured. But the government should have tried to collect data in a more organised fashion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The First World War

    The initial inspiration of defensive war to protect native land began to convert into doubt of war fairness and distrust in Russian tsar wisdom and power. Economical crisis in agriculture resulted establishment of numerous unions and co operations to save agriculture and support producers.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    how 'Rasputin was a man of large heart' and how 'He kept an open house' and mingled with a 'curiously mixed company'. Strangle though nothing in this source implies any bad part played by Rasputin but only that he made 'petitions' that went to the Duma referring 'merely to applications for positions, favours, railway concessions and the like.'

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    Unlike source F, source E praises Stalin in a much exaggerated manner. The writer claims Stalin to be the greatest man that ever lived. The source has many repetitions alliterations like:"every..., every..., every..." which is an effective way of putting across a point especially in a newspaper.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    3) 'Pravda' was the communist party paper. Therefore we can not fully count on the reliability of source E which appeared in this paper, it is also biased. The published speech which source E is, could have been just part of Russian manipulation and propaganda. In fact it seems that way after reading it; the description of Stalin is very much exaggerated and "over the top".

  1. The First World War was decided by the outcome of trench warfare on the ...

    These innovations included rifled artillery and hydraulic recoil mechanisms, zigzag trenches, pillboxes and the tank, along with advances in the military and navy. Their application had the result of making it difficult or nearly impossible to cross defended ground. Britain obtained possession of these weapons and other warfare strategies and put them to use with the French 6.

  2. Stalin and Russia - Sources Question

    This is strange in a way. In Stalin's time people had to be careful of what they said or they may have faced death. I could not imagine anyone being relaxed with a man like this especially while engaged in conversation.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    could easily have had the information presented in his report never published if it was seen to damage their cause against the Bolsheviks. This could make source B more reliable, and as such source A would also seem more reliable since the information it presents is very similar to that which is presented in source B.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Likewise, comparing Sources A and B to Source I, we are again confirmed that not all of the members of the Tsar's family were killed as it suggests, "decided to execute, by shooting, Nikolas Romanov. His wife and son have been sent off to a secure place".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work