• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained?

Extracts from this document...


Question 1. Sources A and B give different figures for the amount of Russian soldiers killed in the First World War. How can this be explained? Leon Trotsky wrote source A for his book 'The history of the Russian Revolution' in 1932. It is a short paragraph from the book explaining how the Russian army lost more men than any other country in the war. Source B was written by John Traynor for his book 'Europe 1890-1990' in 1991. The source is a simple table displaying Russian casualties and total mobilised units in the First World War. ...read more.


Other reasons include another form of mis-recording which was the number of deserters and men taken prisoner were recorded as deaths and so obviously these men could not really be counted as casualties. Unknown to some, Trotsky was a Bolsheviks and may have decided to over estimate the figures written in his book, to try and justify why the Bolsheviks took over and also to show how badly the Tsar did in commanding his armies. To uncover Trotsky further, he was commissar for war in Lenin's government in 1918. ...read more.


Some might argue that eighty-two years later, Traynor's figures could not be nearly as accurate as Trotky's. I agree with this to a certain extent but eighty-two years is plenty of time for new, more accurate figures to be uncovered and proven to be accurate. Over all, any figure can not be proven correct, as proper recordings were not taken. You can't really blame anyone for it because in a battle the last thing you need to do is to stick your head over the top of a trench and see who's been killed or injured. But the government should have tried to collect data in a more organised fashion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He wanted what was good for Russia, but the source isn't very reliable as it was written when the public had no freedom of speech so they weren't allowed to say anything unless it was good about Stalin. The rest of the sources suggest that Stalin was more a monster than a man.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Source F is the more realistic view of Stalin. The reason why it is the most realistic is because Bukharin wrote it in the safety of Paris. This means that Bukharin could of told the whole truth without fear or retribution of attack by Stalin. The truth actually is that Stalin was a murderer but he was also an

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsar is supposed to have been shot", "there is no real evidence as to who or how many victims there were" and "a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it".

  2. The First World War was decided by the outcome of trench warfare on the ...

    After an extensive period of bleak failure on the Western Front, the British found they had begun to succeed in battle as these forms of artillery and practices were benefitting them greatly. When the French began adopting these techniques in battle, the allies proceed to be victorious in the eventual outcome of the war 7.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    To conclude, I believe that the account which source C provides is very different to the accounts presented in sources A and B. The fact that source B was an extract from a report to the British government, and was not an unrestricted publication makes it seem more likely that

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    This Stalin might want to achieve in order so people will be good and not rebellious and cause problems in the country Maybe not as important but the source also provides some useful evidence on Stalin and his background. We can learn from the source that Stalin is was in

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    Rasputin became famous due to his raunchy nature with women. He was also known for his ability to talk to God and help those who were sick and he first came in contact with the Tsar and his family when they needed help with their ill son Alexis.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    In conclusion, the sources express different views and neither of them are one hundred percent reliable. Sources B and C do share some similarities. These sources show the different views of the people. Some idolized him whilst others thought he was an evil dictator.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work