• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources A and B. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful ?Fritz Hesse a journalist who worked for the Nazi Party wrote source A.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Sources A and B. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful ? (7 Marks) Fritz Hesse a journalist who worked for the Nazi Party wrote source A. Hesse infers that Goebbels planned Kristallnacht, and the SA executed the events of Kristallnacht on his orders, so it was not a spontaneous attack. This is backed up in the source: 'Goebbels explaining about a mass attack which he and the SA were going to launch'. Whilst Hitler was not actually part of the plan, he was nevertheless delighted by these events. The source infers this by saying that 'Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his thigh with enthusiasm'. Hesse wrote his account in 1954, which makes it hindsight. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the source was written after the War, so he would have been uncensored, as he didn't have the worry of being sent to a concentration camp. Although, Hesse may have been moving himself away from the Nazi's by showing Hitler and the Nazi's in a bad position. What's more, Goebbels knew that an Anti -Semitic attack would please Hitler. It is also true that Goebbels was 'out of favour with Hitler', at this time, because he had a public affair with a rebellious actress, and Hitler was not happy. From this it is clear that Goebbels was 'trying to win back Hitler's support'. Source B is an extract from a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme Court, after the events of Kristallnacht. ...read more.

Conclusion

In this way, it was clear that the Nazi's themselves would not even admit that the attacks on the Jews had officially been organised by the party itself, and were instead the Nazi's were trying to distance themselves from the event of Kristallnacht altogether. To conclude, both sources A and B show Nazi support for the events of Kristallnacht. When a historian investigates source B, they would have to consider that although it has more of a political purpose hat source A, it was clearly written to make the mass genocide seem a spontaneous uprising of the German people. Thus, a historian would find source A, more useful because I does not appear to have been written for any particular purpose other than to disclose the truth. This in my opinion would no make the source subjective, because it is explain the facts as they are. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Holocaust Sources Questions

    This proves that did work on most people, "dictatorship gradually corrupts its citizens." This is in view of Carr. I think that the people of nazi Germany didn't ask questions because the nazis placed the fear of god in the people, their punishment would have been to "risk arrest and probably death."

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    They planned to use Lubbe while the SA set the fire. It is true that the fire started blazing at 9.15pm and Lubbe was the person who was caught by the officials. This shows that this source proves quote ii to be true.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Therefore he would have been round the other Nazi leaders a lot and they would have told each other their plans and the like. However, he was on trial for his life in Nuremberg for war crime so he would have tried to cover the truth up a bit to clear himself and make others look more guilty.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Along with the fact that the account was written at the time- making it a primary source, this makes it a very reliable, as he would have no reason to lie because he was American and was therefore safe from the wrath of the Nazis' censorship.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    There was a wild, triumphant gleam in the eyes of his pale, young face'. This statement makes Van der Lubbe come across as a madman (the use of the word 'wild' makes him come across as an animal), so this agrees with statement i).

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    Therefore both sources are biased. Source 'G' is trying to turn Britain against the Nazis perhaps in preparation for war and Source 'F' is attempting to turn the Russian people against fascism and try to make them believe communism is just.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    the time was out of favour with Hitler was trying to win back his support." Factors that doubt the reliability of source A is that it is a summary and therefore a reinterpreted version of the events that took place.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    This gives the impression that there were rumours going round about the 'Final Solution,' meaning that the Germans did know what was going on. His mother's dismissal of the gossip may be explained in the first line where she appears to have been manipulated by Nazi propaganda, "My mother...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work