• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

South Africa - Sharpeville Q5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5) Why do you think Sources H and I disagree with Source F about the events at Sharpeville? [8] Sources H and I are both official government views of what happened at Sharpeville. Source H is Colonel Pienaar speaking soon after the shootings, and Source I is Dr Verwoerd's account to parliament, he was prime minister of South Africa at the time. Source F is taken from a statement made by Ambrose Reeves, who had interviewed people who had witnessed the events at Sharpeville. In this answer, I aim to find out why Sources H and I disagree with Source F over what happened at Sharpeville. The sources disagree because they have different provenances. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, they would not support the view of self defence as they had been in the crowd and knew they weren't violent. These witnesses saw first hand what happened which is why they disagree with the 'polished' view of events which the government gave out in Sources H and I. Another reason why the sources disagree is because the people who wrote them have different attitudes to apartheid. The Nationalist Party government had brought apartheid to South Africa and so supported it. The protestors were defying apartheid laws by burning their pass books. The government would not like this so support the view of the police in their sources. However, Anglican Churches in South Africa were against apartheid and so was Ambrose Reeves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, Reeves made his statement support the view of a massacre. In conclusion, the main reason why Source H and I disagree with Source F is because they come from completely different provenances, one which supports apartheid and one which is against it. Sources H and I are from the government who supported apartheid and believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They thought that blacks were incapable of holding peaceful protests and felt they should not have been demonstrating at all. This view comes across in these two sources, but not in Source F. Reeves thought that all races were equal, so did not let black inferiority cloud his judgement and the statement that he made. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 1 Rachel Redman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. External Pressure in South Africa

    as it segregated blacks from whites which had now become wrong in the eyes of many countries. They knew it had to be stopped. There was a swing in world opinion in favour of economic sanctions, so they reintroduced them forgetting that they had failed before.

  2. Free essay

    south africa coursework

    looses millions of pounds worth of electricity due to people stealing it. In the elections of 1994 the government promised people new homes in which people could live instead of the makeshift leaky shacks that millions lived in, however they are still promising that today, regrettably still to millions of people.

  1. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Because of this, we can assume that the readers of this newspaper also support America's decision. The newspapers could not give any negative remarks about the bomb because of censorship, and this might raise questions about how much they agree with Truman.

  2. Sharpeville - massacre or self defence

    However they were all witnesses - they were all there at the shooting which can be proven because they were all being treated in hospital for bullet wounds. It is less likely that the witnesses would be able to tell the same story and be lying so soon after the

  1. Heritage Commemoration in South Africa

    The symbolic heritage our country has previously chosen to reflect is also a problem. One only has to drive through the city centre to see the large number of streets named after prominent figures of apartheid and many colonialists. By looking at these names, we can see how much of our heritage has been omitted.

  2. The end of Apartheid

    He realised that Apartheid would have to end to do this. This was mainly because public opinion was very anti South Africa because of Apartheid, the economy was in downturn because of high inflation and taxation and riots in the townships caused de Klerk to realise that apartheid needed to be stopped.

  1. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    apartheid such as international sanctions and the role played by F.W De Klerk. It is highly unlikely that Tutu, a personal friend of Mandela, as well as a civil rights campaigner, would criticise his friend on his 90th birthday. Unlike source B5, B8 states how Mandela was a key figure in the ending of apartheid.

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    He then passed away, and democracy replaced the old system. In 1997, Nelson Mandela was elected and pronounced the new Prime Minister of South Africa. He was glorified for his major stepping stones he?s given SA, but many testify that he was not the true causation for changes in SA.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work