• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

South Africa - Sharpeville Q5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5) Why do you think Sources H and I disagree with Source F about the events at Sharpeville? [8] Sources H and I are both official government views of what happened at Sharpeville. Source H is Colonel Pienaar speaking soon after the shootings, and Source I is Dr Verwoerd's account to parliament, he was prime minister of South Africa at the time. Source F is taken from a statement made by Ambrose Reeves, who had interviewed people who had witnessed the events at Sharpeville. In this answer, I aim to find out why Sources H and I disagree with Source F over what happened at Sharpeville. The sources disagree because they have different provenances. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, they would not support the view of self defence as they had been in the crowd and knew they weren't violent. These witnesses saw first hand what happened which is why they disagree with the 'polished' view of events which the government gave out in Sources H and I. Another reason why the sources disagree is because the people who wrote them have different attitudes to apartheid. The Nationalist Party government had brought apartheid to South Africa and so supported it. The protestors were defying apartheid laws by burning their pass books. The government would not like this so support the view of the police in their sources. However, Anglican Churches in South Africa were against apartheid and so was Ambrose Reeves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, Reeves made his statement support the view of a massacre. In conclusion, the main reason why Source H and I disagree with Source F is because they come from completely different provenances, one which supports apartheid and one which is against it. Sources H and I are from the government who supported apartheid and believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They thought that blacks were incapable of holding peaceful protests and felt they should not have been demonstrating at all. This view comes across in these two sources, but not in Source F. Reeves thought that all races were equal, so did not let black inferiority cloud his judgement and the statement that he made. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 1 Rachel Redman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. External Pressure in South Africa

    Sporting boycotts were a failure in South Africa as they didn't help see the end of Apartheid. Even though sporting boycotts had failed the other countries didn't stop in bringing down Apartheid. The world had slowly become more and more against South Africa; they knew Apartheid was a big problem

  2. Free essay

    south africa coursework

    so they went in search of work in the cities. As they were not allowed to live in the cities, townships sprang up on the outskirts in which the black workers would live and rapidly they grew in size as more and more people came for work in the cities.

  1. The End of White Majority Rule in South Africa Coursework

    People were starting to boycott South African goods as they were opposed to the Apartheid regime. Economic sanctions were placed on South Africa in August 1986 by a all countries in the Commonwealth, other than Britain which agreed to voluntary sanctions instead.

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Because of this, we can assume that the readers of this newspaper also support America's decision. The newspapers could not give any negative remarks about the bomb because of censorship, and this might raise questions about how much they agree with Truman.

  1. Heritage Commemoration in South Africa

    In the Company Gardens there are a number of statues, such as the sculptures of Sir George Grey, Cecil John Rhodes, Major/General Sir Henry Timson Lukin, as well as Queen Victoria1, to name a few. Many citizens of South Africa may not have even heard of some of these people,

  2. South Africa - Sharpeville Q4

    It is first hand evidence as the photographer was there at the time, and as he worked for a magazine it was his job to provide photographs that give a true reflection of events. However, there are also less useful aspects.

  1. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    The badges were available during the 1970?s and 1980?s, when Mandela was in prison, and were worn by those protesting for change within South Africa, by refusing to buy South African goods and produce. This source questions Mandela?s importance as it shows that the ANC and other anti-apartheid campaigners could and were, continuing to campaign without Mandela?s input.

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    The author described it as not doing his ?nerves any good?. Christianity, a religion that is taught to treat others with empathy and compassion, disregarded and dejected non-whites, whom wanted to share their beliefs in Christ. The apartheid laws were enforced not only by the government (politically), but also religiously and socially.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work