• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

South Africa - Sharpeville Q5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5) Why do you think Sources H and I disagree with Source F about the events at Sharpeville? [8] Sources H and I are both official government views of what happened at Sharpeville. Source H is Colonel Pienaar speaking soon after the shootings, and Source I is Dr Verwoerd's account to parliament, he was prime minister of South Africa at the time. Source F is taken from a statement made by Ambrose Reeves, who had interviewed people who had witnessed the events at Sharpeville. In this answer, I aim to find out why Sources H and I disagree with Source F over what happened at Sharpeville. The sources disagree because they have different provenances. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, they would not support the view of self defence as they had been in the crowd and knew they weren't violent. These witnesses saw first hand what happened which is why they disagree with the 'polished' view of events which the government gave out in Sources H and I. Another reason why the sources disagree is because the people who wrote them have different attitudes to apartheid. The Nationalist Party government had brought apartheid to South Africa and so supported it. The protestors were defying apartheid laws by burning their pass books. The government would not like this so support the view of the police in their sources. However, Anglican Churches in South Africa were against apartheid and so was Ambrose Reeves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, Reeves made his statement support the view of a massacre. In conclusion, the main reason why Source H and I disagree with Source F is because they come from completely different provenances, one which supports apartheid and one which is against it. Sources H and I are from the government who supported apartheid and believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They thought that blacks were incapable of holding peaceful protests and felt they should not have been demonstrating at all. This view comes across in these two sources, but not in Source F. Reeves thought that all races were equal, so did not let black inferiority cloud his judgement and the statement that he made. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 1 Rachel Redman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. External Pressure in South Africa

    Sporting boycotts were a failure in South Africa as they didn't help see the end of Apartheid. Even though sporting boycotts had failed the other countries didn't stop in bringing down Apartheid. The world had slowly become more and more against South Africa; they knew Apartheid was a big problem

  2. Sharpeville - massacre or self defence

    It is also not reliable as he found the original news from the black victims which would be one-sided as they were extremely angry with what had happened and also since he was using the statements as compensation, it is likely that the victims have exaggerated.

  1. Heritage Commemoration in South Africa

    The majority of museums today are also housed in strong examples of European architecture, such as The Iziko Museums of Cape Town, including the Slave Lodge Museum, which is housed in the original V.O.C slave lodge. By choosing to house museums in buildings with so much history attached to them, aren't we reflecting one past over another?

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    Because of this, we can assume that the readers of this newspaper also support America's decision. The newspapers could not give any negative remarks about the bomb because of censorship, and this might raise questions about how much they agree with Truman.

  1. Free essay

    south africa coursework

    As a result of this appalling system a whole generation has been lost to poor education causing unemployment to spiral. As much as apartheid is to blame for depriving the current generation of adults in the black community of a good education, can it really be the cause of the poor education black children are still receiving today?

  2. The End of White Majority Rule in South Africa Coursework

    When he made his first speech in February 1990, many assumed he would follow the same lines as the people before him and not really make any changes. However, in his speech he basically said that he was going to put a stop to Apartheid.

  1. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    apartheid such as international sanctions and the role played by F.W De Klerk. It is highly unlikely that Tutu, a personal friend of Mandela, as well as a civil rights campaigner, would criticise his friend on his 90th birthday. Unlike source B5, B8 states how Mandela was a key figure in the ending of apartheid.

  2. Using sources, who or what was most responsible for the ending of Apartheid?

    I will look at all the sources provided, and come to an interpretation of my own after analysing the sources whether Nelson Mandela was the prime catalyst, or if there were other factors involved just as important. As a statesman, Mandela was profoundly supported by non-whites as he tenaciously fought to debase the Apartheid.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work