• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

South Africa - Sharpeville Q5

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5) Why do you think Sources H and I disagree with Source F about the events at Sharpeville? [8] Sources H and I are both official government views of what happened at Sharpeville. Source H is Colonel Pienaar speaking soon after the shootings, and Source I is Dr Verwoerd's account to parliament, he was prime minister of South Africa at the time. Source F is taken from a statement made by Ambrose Reeves, who had interviewed people who had witnessed the events at Sharpeville. In this answer, I aim to find out why Sources H and I disagree with Source F over what happened at Sharpeville. The sources disagree because they have different provenances. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, they would not support the view of self defence as they had been in the crowd and knew they weren't violent. These witnesses saw first hand what happened which is why they disagree with the 'polished' view of events which the government gave out in Sources H and I. Another reason why the sources disagree is because the people who wrote them have different attitudes to apartheid. The Nationalist Party government had brought apartheid to South Africa and so supported it. The protestors were defying apartheid laws by burning their pass books. The government would not like this so support the view of the police in their sources. However, Anglican Churches in South Africa were against apartheid and so was Ambrose Reeves. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, Reeves made his statement support the view of a massacre. In conclusion, the main reason why Source H and I disagree with Source F is because they come from completely different provenances, one which supports apartheid and one which is against it. Sources H and I are from the government who supported apartheid and believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They thought that blacks were incapable of holding peaceful protests and felt they should not have been demonstrating at all. This view comes across in these two sources, but not in Source F. Reeves thought that all races were equal, so did not let black inferiority cloud his judgement and the statement that he made. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 1 Rachel Redman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. External Pressure in South Africa

    Sporting boycotts were a failure in South Africa as they didn't help see the end of Apartheid. Even though sporting boycotts had failed the other countries didn't stop in bringing down Apartheid. The world had slowly become more and more against South Africa; they knew Apartheid was a big problem

  2. Free essay

    south africa coursework

    The high drop out rate displays how pupils often feel that education is getting them nowhere and they turn to crime instead contributing to the ever rising problem of crime and violence. Education is a difficult and expensive problem for Thabo Mbeki to solve.

  1. The End of White Majority Rule in South Africa Coursework

    Over 50% of the world's gold was from South Africa, so it had been a major part of the whole South African economy. There was a drought, and food became more expensive, making it even harder for the poor. South Africa was also finding that it needed more skilled and semi-skilled workers.

  2. Heritage Commemoration in South Africa

    who are considered heroes of the past, which highlights how outdated and obsolete some of the heritage we choose to commemorate has become. Previously, all sculptures and monuments in Cape Town were entirely biased in that they only represented a small minority of the South African population, and usually only highlighted particular individuals, rather than the people as a whole.

  1. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    after 14 years, his views had not yet altered "The dropping of the two bombs stopped the war and saved millions of lives". Source A is an article from a British newspaper, and mostly agrees with Truman's viewpoint of dropping the bomb because Britain had helped America in the war against Japan.

  2. South Africa - Sharpeville Q4

    It is first hand evidence as the photographer was there at the time, and as he worked for a magazine it was his job to provide photographs that give a true reflection of events. However, there are also less useful aspects.

  1. Sharpeville - massacre or self defence

    The reporter claims to have been there - 'i saw a police man taking his riflebutt..' but this was in 1990 which is 30 years after the incident. Source B disagrees with this statement as it clearly shows that the people were running away and that no one was carrying

  2. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    The badges were available during the 1970?s and 1980?s, when Mandela was in prison, and were worn by those protesting for change within South Africa, by refusing to buy South African goods and produce. This source questions Mandela?s importance as it shows that the ANC and other anti-apartheid campaigners could and were, continuing to campaign without Mandela?s input.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work