• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin Coursework: Question 4 Source H is a photograph showing the peasants demonstrating against the kulaks and favouring collectivisation. It is also subjective towards Stalin and has probably been doctored in order to indoctrinate the Russian people to the way of thinking that Stalin desired. The first problem with the photograph is that the banner that the peasants are carrying reads, "We demand collectivisation and the liquidation of the kulaks as a class", and however, since most peasants in the 1930 were illiterate, the whole idea of the peasants carrying a written banner suddenly becomes implausible. Stalin would have probably staged this whole photo in order to convey positive political propaganda, showing that despite claims that collectivisation was failing, the peasants themselves still supported the scheme and so it was going to work. In fact, the peasants in the photograph may not be actual peasants, but Soviet Party members who have been asked by Stalin to participate in staging this photograph. However, whilst there is a strong possibility that this photograph has been doctored to suit Stalin's wishes, looking at if from a different perspective, some peasants did see the lack of kulaks as a lack of competition and a chance to become one of Russia's elite farmers. ...read more.

Middle

Source J is a passage from a book called "Stalin: Man of Steel" written by a historian called E. Roberts in 1986. The date shows that it was published in the aftermath of Stalin's era, when Gorbachev was in power, therefore, E. Roberts is unlikely to be under any pressure to be subjective towards or against Stalin as Stalin was dead and the Socialist Realism Policy no longer applied to him. However, just because it was written in hindsight, does not mean it is a completely trustworthy source as E. Roberts may be writing this in order to demonstrate just how brutal Stalin's regime was, instead, it is possible to tell that Source J is a trustworthy source because it is written in a balanced way. E. Roberts starts off by stating how Stalin ignored "the great cost in human life and misery" and is thus showing the bestial side of Stalin, however, he then goes on to counter-act this point by saying how "The collective farms, despite their inefficiencies, did grow more food than the tiny, privately owned holdings had done." By doing this, E. Roberts has created a balanced and therefore Source J is an objective source. ...read more.

Conclusion

98% of all privately owned farms to make big State owned farms, Stalin also modernised farming by introducing new technology to the State farms. Stalin wanted each collective farm to have a tractor station where tractors were available to be hired out be the collective farm workers and tractors soon replaced horses on the farm. In fact, in 1929, the USSR had 34 million horses, however, by 1933, it only had 17 million horses. This was because half of the horses were slaughtered, probably in an attempt to get more farmers to use tractors instead of horses (farmers were originally reluctant to switch to new methods of farming). Overall, all three sources have content that can be verified with other pieces of historical data and could therefore be useful for a historian studying collectivisation, however, since Source J is the only balanced and objective source, it would probably be the most reliable source. Whilst it shows some of Stalin's failings with the collectivisation policy (e.g. Stalin's ignorance of all the deaths), it then goes and counter-acts that with some of the positives of collectivisation (e.g. the mechanisation of agriculture). Sources H and I, both provide useful information, however, they are subjective sources, and for a historian looking for an objective and reliable source of information, Source J would be the best. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The Plans saw the successful completion of projects to provide power for the growth in industry, an example like I mentioned was the 'Dneiprostroi Dam'. The Five Year Plans developed the major cities such as Leningrad and Moscow. The coal and steel industries expanded rapidly in the early 1939's when the second of the plans were introduced.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    be executed but as shown in the cartoon death was the punishment. Source L gives the same message, it show there was no justice in the USSR during Stalin's reign and also agrees with source E, his power was in excess and no one could oppose him.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The show trials (purges), was originally made so Stalin has an excuse to "purge", clear out, his opponents in the Party. In show trials, loyal Bolsheviks like Bukharin, one of Stalin's loyal ex-partners were arrested and tortured to an extent that he confessed to being a traitor to the State.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source J is practical, it shows the Supreme Soviets as it really was, everyone agreeing with Stalin and claiming that what he believed in was true. However Source I only shows how ridiculous the show trials were, source J goes as far as showing the new constitution after Stalin's show trials were over.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    For most people Stalin wasn't a tyrant dominating an oppressed country. He and his style of government were popular. The communist party saw him as a winner and soviet citizens saw him as a "dictator of people." The soviet people sincerely believed in Stalin and this belief was built up deliberately by communist leaders and by Stalin himself.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The source states that the man is "privileged"to see Stalin as he is such an "inspired leader".The writer says that in years to come Stalin will be viewed as a God-Like figure by the men of Russia. From what really happened in Russia we can see that Stalin was not the great man as the writer portrayed him as.

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    I have based this decision on the fact that David Lowe does not once show Stalin in a positive light. To add to that, the writing in the cartoon suggests has an unstable mind is paranoid as well as stupid.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Evidence which proves this theory, is that this Source is written by Stalin, which means that he won�t write anything which could damage him or the figure of a false Stalin he had created. This Source is unrealistic and inaccurate simply because it is written by Stalin and it can�t

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work