• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin Coursework: Question 4 Source H is a photograph showing the peasants demonstrating against the kulaks and favouring collectivisation. It is also subjective towards Stalin and has probably been doctored in order to indoctrinate the Russian people to the way of thinking that Stalin desired. The first problem with the photograph is that the banner that the peasants are carrying reads, "We demand collectivisation and the liquidation of the kulaks as a class", and however, since most peasants in the 1930 were illiterate, the whole idea of the peasants carrying a written banner suddenly becomes implausible. Stalin would have probably staged this whole photo in order to convey positive political propaganda, showing that despite claims that collectivisation was failing, the peasants themselves still supported the scheme and so it was going to work. In fact, the peasants in the photograph may not be actual peasants, but Soviet Party members who have been asked by Stalin to participate in staging this photograph. However, whilst there is a strong possibility that this photograph has been doctored to suit Stalin's wishes, looking at if from a different perspective, some peasants did see the lack of kulaks as a lack of competition and a chance to become one of Russia's elite farmers. ...read more.

Middle

Source J is a passage from a book called "Stalin: Man of Steel" written by a historian called E. Roberts in 1986. The date shows that it was published in the aftermath of Stalin's era, when Gorbachev was in power, therefore, E. Roberts is unlikely to be under any pressure to be subjective towards or against Stalin as Stalin was dead and the Socialist Realism Policy no longer applied to him. However, just because it was written in hindsight, does not mean it is a completely trustworthy source as E. Roberts may be writing this in order to demonstrate just how brutal Stalin's regime was, instead, it is possible to tell that Source J is a trustworthy source because it is written in a balanced way. E. Roberts starts off by stating how Stalin ignored "the great cost in human life and misery" and is thus showing the bestial side of Stalin, however, he then goes on to counter-act this point by saying how "The collective farms, despite their inefficiencies, did grow more food than the tiny, privately owned holdings had done." By doing this, E. Roberts has created a balanced and therefore Source J is an objective source. ...read more.

Conclusion

98% of all privately owned farms to make big State owned farms, Stalin also modernised farming by introducing new technology to the State farms. Stalin wanted each collective farm to have a tractor station where tractors were available to be hired out be the collective farm workers and tractors soon replaced horses on the farm. In fact, in 1929, the USSR had 34 million horses, however, by 1933, it only had 17 million horses. This was because half of the horses were slaughtered, probably in an attempt to get more farmers to use tractors instead of horses (farmers were originally reluctant to switch to new methods of farming). Overall, all three sources have content that can be verified with other pieces of historical data and could therefore be useful for a historian studying collectivisation, however, since Source J is the only balanced and objective source, it would probably be the most reliable source. Whilst it shows some of Stalin's failings with the collectivisation policy (e.g. Stalin's ignorance of all the deaths), it then goes and counter-acts that with some of the positives of collectivisation (e.g. the mechanisation of agriculture). Sources H and I, both provide useful information, however, they are subjective sources, and for a historian looking for an objective and reliable source of information, Source J would be the best. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    the USSR an encouragement of socialism and industrialisation to other countries like Cuba and China who saw the USSR transform dramatically. However, if you compare Russia after the five-year plans to the rest of the world, they were still quite far behind.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    be executed but as shown in the cartoon death was the punishment. Source L gives the same message, it show there was no justice in the USSR during Stalin's reign and also agrees with source E, his power was in excess and no one could oppose him.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The show trials (purges), was originally made so Stalin has an excuse to "purge", clear out, his opponents in the Party. In show trials, loyal Bolsheviks like Bukharin, one of Stalin's loyal ex-partners were arrested and tortured to an extent that he confessed to being a traitor to the State.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    All these men were executed during the 1930's. Yagoda was falsely accused of spying for Japan and Germany, and plotting to kill Lenin. Zinoviev and Kamenev were two men who helped Stalin come into power, but after Stalin did not require their services anymore he accused Zinoviev of plotting with

  1. Stalin man or monster

    in the same century as Stalin," this quote portrays the happiness of people living within the same time frame as Stalin as though he was some kind of religious figure. Stalin is shown to be some what of a hero and a fine leader through source E.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    To add to that, Stalin would definitely not have allowed for foreigners such as Dr Hewlett Johnson to go and visit Magnitogorsk, where living conditions were horrendous. At this time, the United Kingdom, most of Europe and also the USA were going through a depression due to the Wall Street crash.

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    This became evident when he created a "barrier" separating his Communist Russia from neighbouring Europeans. He did this so he would be seen from the outside world as the great and all peaceful leader of the U.S.S.R Question 3 Stalin had a huge task ahead of him when he took over the reign of Russia.

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Explain your answer. From my point of view Source D doesn�t provides us real evidence which proves how was really Stalin like, although people maked up their own opinions. The impression I get from this Source is that Stalin was a hypocritical man.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work