• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster 1a. The sources give a number of different impressions of Stalin and his character, however there are some similarities. All the sources show different views which people in Russia would have had of Stalin' it is obvious after looking at the three sources that A is against Stalin and his regime, whereas B and C give more positive views about Stalin's character. Source A is a cartoon produced in Paris in the 1930�s. The cartoon features Stalin showing three pyramids of skulls as if he was a tour guide. The caption translates to, "Visit the pyramids of the USSR" The cartoon shows the result of his policies and shows the fact that he is willing to put human lives down to achieve his goals. Source A shows Stalin as a cruel and ambitious man willing to sacrifice Russian lives to stay in power and ensure the modernisation of Russia. The skulls represent the deaths caused as a result of starvation as there was a shortage of food in Russia; also many deaths occurred as a result of the Purges, which were measures Stalin took to get rid of opposition. An exiled Russian drew this source; therefore the artist could be bitter and biased against Stalin and his policies. Source B is an official Soviet painting of Stalin with workers at a hydroelectric power station in the 1930�s. Source B however is different to source A because it is aiming to support Stalin and put a good view across to the Russian people about there leader. The picture shows Stalin with some workers talking to them and relaxing with them. The view of Stalin, which the picture is portraying, is that he cares about the workers and the danger and living conditions they put up with. Also it shows Stalin as a friendly person who doesn't raise above common people lastly it shows that he is interested in Russia's industry. ...read more.

Middle

The reason Source F gives a negative view of Stalin is because Bukharin who was a supporter of Stalin wrote it. Bukharin was a victim of the Purges. This probably meant he was angry with Stalin and hated him; this source is an extract from a speech by Bukharin in Paris where Stalin was hated. In conclusion the two sources where different because the writers had been exposed to different sides of Stalin and were influenced by where they were. 1d. To decide whether or not to trust Khrushchev's assessment of Stalin I need to look at a number of things. Firstly I must look at who Khrushchev was, the content of the text and if it matches what I already know of Stalin and lastly I must put the text into context and ask why it has been written, what it is supposed to achieve? Khrushchev was a leading figure in the communist party when Stalin was the main leader, Khrushchev survived the purges and became the leader of the communist party after Stalin died. Khrushchev wrote both sources G and H when he was in power. They were part of a speech made by Khrushchev to the Soviet communist party in 1956. Khrushchev didn't have a fall out with Stalin and stayed in his good books because of this the sources probably are not bias against Stalin but what he was really like. In this respect I trust that Khrushchev's assessment is not aimed to put Stalin down but the truth from Khrushchev's eyes. Source G seems to be justifying what Stalin had done over the past years and what he did was necessary to accomplish his goals. We get the impression Khrushchev thinks that what Stalin did was necessary for the defence of socialism and communism. In my opinion Khrushchev is attempting to defend Stalin in this speech. Perhaps the reason Khrushchev supports Stalin's actions is because he had just taken over as leader of the Soviet communist party and maybe did not want to lose his party's support, as he knew that the Soviet communist party held Stalin highly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course this speech was done by a writer who was under the influence of the congress of Soviets. He seems to be a person the Russian people look up to, not a person they hate for what he has done. This source describes Stalin as strong, beautiful, wise and marvellous not any of the characteristics of a monster. Source G and H are not positive views of Stalin but neither do they accuse him of being evil. These sources justify Stalin's actions, source G says 'We cannot say that these were deeds of a mad deposit. He considered this should be done in the interest of the party and the working masses. This is saying that Stalin was not a monster but just confused, he thought he was helping the Russian people. These sources are in my opinion accurate accounts of what Stalin was really like. Source K is from a biography Stalin published in 1947 this gives the impression that it may not be entirely accurate and the truth could have been distorted. The source shows Stalin as a brilliant leader and teacher, it described Stalin as a man with an iron will, clarity of mind and a devotion to his party. In my opinion not all these are true I think however Stalin did have an iron will and there can be no doubt he was devoted to his party. Overall I can conclude that none of the sources succeed in capturing Stalin's character completely. There are quite a few sources which do support the statement Stalin was a monster, but many other sources suggest he wasn't evil. In my opinion source L sums up Stalin' character the best; it says Stalin was a skilled politician and one of the greatest politicians of the twentieth century. However it then goes on to say that he wasn't a good man and had a dark side to his nature. In conclusion I don't think that these sources supported the view that Stalin was a monster that much, although most sources agree Stalin did have a dark side to his nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Ostobrists, 11-16 year olds were called the pioneers and young people over 16 were called the Komsomol. Before Stalin came to power in 1919 a women's department of the central committee called the Zhenotdel, it encouraged free abortion, female literacy, made it easier for women to get a divorce and have more women working.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    stations being opened and Stalin being proud, not of his achievements, but of the peasants and his joint achievement. This was a roaring success. In source B Stalin is proud of his achievements and his peasants for achieving his target, however it fails to mention what was the cost of the five year plan.

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Source J shows how Stalin manipulated laws so he could maintain his power. "Stalin will not let him live"; this shows the methods Stalin used were seen as "normal"; his is not being called a murderer directly. Stalin only maintained his rule because he eliminated the opposition; he was extremely

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This source doesn't show the real picture and therefore is not reliable. The only evidence this source shows of Stalin is that he was a liar and felt he had to make himself look good by putting other people down.

  1. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    However [c11]the policy was not successful; unskilled government aid was given and many perished. The agricultural output however was increased but there is debate about whether or not it was due to the new policy or better weather conditions. I agree [c12]with Richard Service's statement, being the value of human life is greater than the value of economic output.

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    By making the victims deliver humiliating confessions while on public trial, Stalin was able to reveal the scale of the conspiracy against him and to prove the need for the purging to continue. The destruction of the Old Bolsheviks, those who did not owe their position to Stalin, allowed Stalin

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    It is also possible that people would get the wrong ideas about Stalin and would try and would try to revolt but this was unlikely because the Secret police would put any conspiracies down before then, such things only existed in Stalin's paranoia.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    This would have gained Stalin much more respect from the Russian people, and more of their trust. In fact, Stalin was anything but trustworthy. While Kamenev and Zinoviev were admitting to plotting with Trotsky, Stalin had Trotsky murdered, who was in exile in Mexico.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work