• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man Or Monster?

Extracts from this document...


G.C.S.E. History Assignment B Stalin: Man Or Monster? Question 1: Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with references to the sources. Source A is a French cartoon, showing how Stalin's policies actually affect the masses. The text reads: "Visit the USSR's pyramids!". It shows Stalin gesturing towards mounds of human skulls, with carrion crows flying overhead. Source B is an "official" Soviet painting picturing Stalin standing with cheerful-looking workers in front of the newly-built Dnieprostroi hydroelectric dam. Source C is a photograph of Stalin shaking the grateful hands of wives of army officers. On the whole, Source A gives a different impression from B or C, because it is drawn form a foreign perspective. Stalin had seized control of all newspapers, and all creative works were "officially" released by the government. A cartoon showing a negative view of Stalin would certainly have not been allowed, and whoever was responsible would have been sent to an internment camp. Some Russians managed to escape Stalin's USSR before his dictatorship really struck fear into the people, or were lucky enough to get out. These exiles often travelled to other parts of Europe or America. In this case, the exiles were in France,which is why the text is in French. I would also estimate that, being able to speak a foreign language, these exiles were more than likely intellectuals who would have suffered under Stalin's regime. It is also probable that they had experienced labour camps themselves and were keen to tell others abroad the horror of his regime (such as in Alexander Solzhenitszyn's works). The French generally would also have agreed with this cartoon, as France and Russia were old allies under the Tsarist regime, and so were deeply suspicious of the Bolsheviks who overthrew the royals. Source B gives an entirely different impression of Stalin, one of friendship and love towards his people, as he seems close and brotherly to his smiling workers. ...read more.


Bukharin, a high-ranking Bolshevik, would be more aware of what Stalin was up to and what he was like than the writer of Source E. Perhaps a pang of jealousy is evident in Bukharin's speech, when he says Stalin is not the best, and that Stalin knows it, but kills anyone he perceives to be a threat. This, in retrospect, is accurate, but the source is still biased against Stalin as it was written by a man embittered by Stalin's success. The sources are both biased, but I would rate Bukharin's source as more accurate, as Source E was effectively created by Stalin himself. Question 4: Study Sources I and J. How far do these two sources agree about Stalin's 'show-trials'? Explain your answer. Artists outside the U.S.S.R drew both these sources, so neither would be for the show-trials. Source I was an American source, and they were always deeply distrustful of Communism, which went against everything America stood for. It shows Stalin as the judge, and in the background, a noose is hanging. The four defendants in the box are each willingly and smilingly admitting their guilt to Stalin. Source J does not concentrate on the guilty, rather the fact that the trials are all arranged by Stalin. The judge, jury, prosecution and scribe are all figures of Stalin. This source shows more of the bias of the courts rather than the plight of the Party members. Source I implies that the men have no chance of being let off as not guilty, they will all be executed, so they might as well plead guilty. Source J agrees that no men would have a chance to be found not guilty in a court of Stalin. The very reason why someone would be subjected to these trials would be that Stalin didn't like them and felt that they were untrustworthy. This source would have been drawn by Russian exiles in France - perhaps even victims of these 'show-trials'. ...read more.


Absolute power corrupted absolutely, and Stalin grew increasingly determined to eradicate anyone who questioned him. Millions died in the Purges, one of the most terrifying points in his regime. People tried to reason this, saying that Stalin did not want these people to be killed; he was not aware of it. But later, documents were found which listed those in prison camps, destined to die, and Stalin's signature OK-ing it below. If Source D by Churchill is to be believed, it shows Stalin as a man who desperately tried to boost the economy, but tried not to think of its consequences. He said that it was bad, and difficult, but repeats that it was necessary. Perhaps this was his solace - that a few needed to suffer to pave the way for the good of Russia in the future. He also quickly changes the subject when questioned by Churchill about the collective farm struggles, perhaps trying not to think of millions who got put into prison camps, or perhaps just trying to change the subject to prevent his decision from looking bad. Privately, he married twice (he hated his son Jacob by his first marriage) and secondly to a girl called Nadyezhda Aliluyera, 22 years his junior. After some time, Nadyezhda committed suicide, and in her suicide note, criticised Stalin for his ways and his policies. Stalin was said to be very angry, but his chauffeur recalled a gentler side to his nature - he would visit his wife's grave and sit there and grieve for hours. Despite intense speculation, Stalin still manages to retain some mystery about him (no doubt he had his personal history re-written, and the Soviet legend has blurred with the truth), but I do not believe he was a monster who sent millions to slaughter for the sake of it, but as a very insecure man who felt he was acting in the Party's best interests, but twisting the Communist theory to his own style, and leaving his mark on Russia for generations to come. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    In 1928 there was a population of 70 million cattle in Russia, in 1933 it was 38 million. The pig population fell from 26 million to 12 million and the sheep population fell from 146 million to 50 million. The Soviet Union was unable to get over these tremendous losses until the 1950s.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The change in economy and industry was shown in 'Special Economic Zones', which were set up by Deng to enable China to get more contact with the outside world and benefit from foreign industry. One of these zones was set up next to the colony of Hong Kong; this was to bring China and the colony closer together.

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Stalin believed these men were involved in a conspiracy Trotsky was planning against himself and communism. In the background of the cartoon officials are standing by the gallows. The cartoon shows the accused Communist Party members in a trial; Stalin has been portrayed as the judge.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    could be bought by the government to feed the increasing number of industrial workers in the cities. Besides, the government needed money to finance new industries, the transport system - railways, power stations and mines. Peasants were the best targets to pay for the development areas as there were the majority of the population.

  1. Was terror the main reason why Stalin kept power in the Soviet Union?

    These things helped Stalin because he was able to make the people do what he wanted without using force. The more force he put on them the more could be forced back in rebellion, I was good that he was able to control the people without such force.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    If Russia really could catch up within ten years it would provide a huge boost to communism. In order to achieve this, Gosplan drew up plans to maximise working output. Targets were set for every industry, each region, each mine and factory, each foreman and even every worker, and foreign experts and engineers were called in.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    This source is likely to be bias because it is Stalin making the claims, and also Stalin who has imposed the five year plans, as such it is likely to be propaganda. However, the claim is confirmed by official archive figures and the diagram (source D), therefore making it less likely to be falsified.

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    People had been complaining a lot. Even after the introduction of the October Manifesto, they were not happy. The Duma's didn't give right to the peasants and the workers. Even after the freedom on no censorship, the government were censoring a lot which weren't even necessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work