• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin:man or monster

Extracts from this document...


T oStalin - Man or Monster 5. Throughout Stalin's reign, he had his supporters; however, he had far more people who despised him. Stalin was a very suspicious and paranoid man, as Khrushchev told us, and this only grew as his time in power grew to a close. Five out of the 10 sources are against him and four are pro Stalin. One source gives good and bad about Stalin. The sources that show Stalin in a good light are mainly ones that have almost certainly been ordered by Stalin himself. He was a man who believed he could never be wrong and wouldn't let anyone be seen to be more intelligent or powerful than he was. He wanted everyone to believe his ideas, he wanted everyone to admire his ambitions and he wanted everyone to love him. Stalin wanted himself to be pictured as a god or the closest one can get to perfection. Stalin was a cruel leader, but by no means a bad one. The sources don't manage to cover all the detail, but Stalin managed to change the face of Russia. ...read more.


They didn't want to be sent to labour camps or be shot. Stalin brought about so much misery and depression too. Many families and family members were shot, so the existing family would be angry and resentful to him, and through this manner, he gained very little genuine popularity. Any that were prepared to stand up to him were sent to labour camps, often in extremely harsh parts of Russia, working under harsh conditions. Source A shows Stalin standing in front of pyramids of skulls. He doesn't look hurt or even remorse about the fact he has brought about the death of enough people to make pyramids. He looks unbothered and casual about the fact he's seen and ordered the end of so many innocent lives. These acts of evil are admitted by Bukharin when he gave a speech about Stalin in Paris 1936. 'If someone speaks better than him, that man is for it'. Bukharin is telling us what happened in Stalin's reign. Stalin wanted to be the best, the first. ...read more.


Just by the way he is standing, he radiates confidence and supremacy. Often, similar paintings like this one would appear in papers or just anywhere, showing Stalin either doing well or being honourable or pictures of him striking impressive poses, like the next source. Source C shows Stalin congratulating the wives of army men. It's showing that he does actually have a heart, which was the aim of the pictures In conclusion, I think that overall these sources show Stalin as a monster. Despite a few successes like the industrialisation of Russian and collectivisation, he managed those whilst slaughtering so many lives. He had innocent people killed because they thought badly of him. He had people sent to labour camps because they believed something different from him. He would destroy someone and often their family's lives if they made themselves out to be cleverer than him. Stalin used his power to kill his despisers and create an image of himself. The majority of the sources that are positive about Stalin are most likely ordered by him. The sources make him out as a monster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Soon into the year 1930 the government found that half the peasants in the USSR joined the collectivisation scheme. Nevertheless, the grain deficiency was not resolved and many of the peasants did not like the collectivisation scheme at all so killed many of the resources.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He's saying how it is disgraceful that men care more for animals than their fellow man, when Stalin was the one who killed tens of millions of people! He is simply trying to make himself look like a caring, kind, moral man by putting everyone else down and portraying man kind to be blood thirsty.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    He shows his modesty in both sources as he is dressed in simple clothing. However, a great difference between the two is that source B is a real painting, which means that Stalin was actually at the power station with the peasants.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    where the end of their lives was met. Nearly every family in the Soviet Union had lost someone to the purges, where raids in the middle of the nights took place and some people "simply disappeared." Source A thus gives an impression of an evil Stalin, portraying him as an

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    In fact, now Russia could match the industrial forces of powers like Britain, France, the USSR and Japan which is why she could get herself out of hot water when the German Hitler invaded her in 1941. Still, evidence of his intentions of earning glory still remain prominent by the

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    It is very difficult to derive whether Stalin really was a beast but one factor was clearly evident was that he was an apprehensive and mistrustful paranoid. Question 7 Trying to determine whether Stalin was indeed a man or a monster is very difficult to judge.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    reform programmes continued up until his death on 20th February, 1997, just four months away from the handover of Hong Kong back to Chinese sovereignty. There was no power struggle after Deng's death like that that had occurred after the death of Mao.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    However, in the last analysis, the possibility of maintaining and deepening Soviet democracy depended on the material conditions. A key question was the relation of industry to agriculture. This was just another way of expressing the relation of the proletariat to the peasantry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work