• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster?

Extracts from this document...


Assignment B: Objective 3 Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Study Sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with references to the source. Each source represents the three most popular views of Stalin. `A' shows the hated figure of persecution and tyranny, `B' portrays the public figure he wanted to be seen as, a friend of the people `one of them, and `C' showing the respected and noble leader who kept in touch with the needs and wants of his devoted people. A is a cartoon published in France and showing the results of his policies in the 1930's. This famous source was drawn by an exiled Russian with the caption "Visitez l'U.R.S.S. ses pyramids!..." or "visit the pyramids of the USSR!". This cartoon is sending the message that Stalin has been responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of people but that he is somehow proud of this achievement and wants to show the power he has to the rest of the world. Source A is the controlling communist leader who is distrusted by Europe and America. Source B is the image of the trusted leader, respected and loved by his loyal citizens. This is a painting that makes Stalin look as though he is almost one of the family and completely comfortable amongst ordinary people. It's also sowing the USSR's achievements in industry and emphasising that Stalin had a major role in this. Again this source shows that perhaps Stalin is overly enthusiastic to show his power to the rest of the world. C is a picture and as B is an image of Stalin amongst his citizens, looking comfortable and respected. As in this photograph he is congratulating the wives of army officers he is showing the gratitude he feels for the USSR's soldiers and hard working people. As with source B this is a showy piece that, again, is demonstrating a point to the world, in this case that he has admiration for those who serve his country and the people closest to them. ...read more.


Khrushchev's analysis of Stalin seems quite accurate in relation to some opinions of him for example those that believed he was a ruthless and harsh dictator. Khrushchev must account for the mistakes and mishaps that Stalin encountered but cannot be too critical as, after all Khrushchev is still a communist and must protect the interests of the party. Also Khrushchev knows that Stalin was such a powerful and respected leader that his influence was still amongst the people, and would be for a long time. Khrushchev's speech is a way for him to get the business of Stalin and any bad feeling and knowledge of his actions out of the way early in so that the country and party could move on and forget the mistakes of the earlier years. By facing the reality that Stalin was only a man and was an extremely powerful figure that perhaps was corrupted by this, gave Khrushchev the opportunity to make excuses for this and explain that Stalin did what he did in the interests of the party and the people. Khrushchev manages to convince us that Stalin was a heavily burdened leader that had no choice but to rule unconventionally at least some times. He makes us feel sorry for Stalin and the pressures he had and so is successful in inciting forgiveness from which his reign can begin. There are several viewpoints from which Khrushchev's analysis can be scrutinised. Khrushchev was, after all, a member of the great USSR when Stalin was leader and may have been another of those who worshipped him as a God. Stalin had a great affect on many millions of people Khrushchev may be another example of a devoted follower. Khrushchev may have played down Stalin's failures and flaws as he was a supporter and would not want to see Stalin in a negative way. There was probably a lot more criticism of Stalin that Khrushchev could have made mention of as Stalin as only a human being and was capable of a lot worse in his position of power. ...read more.


Stalin was the leader of one of the largest and important countries in the world in a time when the relations between the countries of the world were at their most fragile. There is always going to be much speculation on such a powerful and interesting figure. Stalin managed to not only bring the USSR through the war but helped it emerge as a superpower at an immense cost and suffering to his own people. He was also responsible for the purge of every one of his opposition in 1936-38. Stalin did all that he could to stop any negative press on him an also emerged as a paranoid and suspicious man so it is difficult to know what sort of a person Stalin really was. Being such an interesting and important character in history means that there are going to be thousands of opinions and theories based on him and that he was such a an unknown personality only makes the thirst for knowledge and interest in him greater. There is so much to know and find out about this great leader and the character that drove him to such decisions. There are many interpretations of Stalin and his policies and leadership. There was a whole country of people who worshipped him as a god and other allied countries that believed him to be a malicious tyrant. There is bound to be much disagreement over the person everyone thought that Stalin was and what his real intentions were, was he acting in pursuit of greatness for his people or to being an evil and malicious man? There are many different sides to the story and many angry, hurt and deeply affected people with their own interpretation of Stalin. There is a lot to be said of this man and so disagreement and differing opinion will occur as we will never truly know the mind of such a man and all powerful leader as Stalin is part of history and we will never know the whole truth about him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Also writers such as Isaac Babel and Osip Mandelstam were executed because of Stalin's terror. Many senior officers were killed. This led to an inexperienced army to face the Germans in 1941. But even though the army was weakened the soviet soldiers still resisted the Germans with great courage.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Mao himself, although he disliked the Gang of Four, and his relationship with his wife was, to say the least, strained, disliked Deng's 'capitalism' even more. The power struggle grew more intense when, on the 8th January 1976, Zhou Enlai died of cancer in a Beijing Hospital.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Even though some factory workers tried to escape the brutal work and harsh regulations, Stalin proved too clever for them as his secret police introduced internal passports to prevent open transfers of workers from one firm to another in the USSR.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    make good the difference in 10 years or they crush us'. Stalin gained power over the workers, due to the Industrialisation scheme. The sate gave a specific amount to the factory managers of how much goods were to be produced.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    There are two main interpretations of this source. One interpretation is that the writer truly believes what he is saying and didn't see (or chose to ignore) the darker side of Stalin's personality. At this time the purges and show trials were just starting and it is hard to believe that anyone who really knew the horror of what Stalin was doing would write like this man did.

  2. " Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia".

    The article was made in a concentration camp (gulag) in 1925. It portrays a negative view on Stalin's rule. The article is very trust worthy, as we know this from background research done previously. It is a article containing fact but mainly opinion as it is very biased.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    By putting them down, he is making himself look like the hero. He needed to win the public over, and by making himself seem like this heroic, moral person, he is covering his other plans up. This source would suggest that Stalin cared about humankind and about the people of

  2. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows ...

    This shows how Stalin wants to be seen. Source F is a speech by Buhkarin in Paris in 1936. Buhkarin was a former politburo leader and an ally of Stalin, so he should be one of the people who knew Stalin best. The source focuses on Stalin's bad points and who he was, rather than any of his achievements.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work