• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin, Man or Monster? Source based questions.

Extracts from this document...


Stalin, Man or Monster? Stalin, was he a man or a man or monster? The answer to this question depends entirely on how you look at it. On one hand, Stalin did an amazing job of bringing Russia up to speed with the rest of the world, improving industry and modernising Russia at an amazing rate using the five-year plans. On the other hand he was single handily responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in the purges, labour camps, show trials etc. But this was on face value; Stalin had done a lot of good for the country, but along with it a lot of bad. In the following coursework I hope to use the evidence I have to lay out all the wrongs against all the rights that Stalin did, and find out whether Stalin really was the monster everyone thinks he was. 1. Study sources A, B and C. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with references to the sources. Source A is clearly against Stalin. It is a French cartoon of him showing off piles of skulls saying, "Welcome to the USSR pyramids." Stalin is shown to be proud of what he has accomplished, comparing the deaths he had caused to some of the most famous, amazing architecture in the world. He was proud of the deaths he caused, similarly in source B he is shown to be proud of the dam that he organised. In source B he is wearing white, as if representing purity and kindness. He is pictured as a relaxed man talking with workers, at the opening of a hydroelectric power station. This source was an official Soviet painting, obviously supporting Stalin and trying to make him look like he cares and listens to his people. Stalin wanted the image of being a caring man, willing to listen to what people wanted when in fact he was none of that. ...read more.


Khrushchev didn't need to lie about Stalin as there was no threat from him any more, but if people had thought Stalin was great while he started abusing him then he may have lost support. Source G is making excuses for Stalin. He is saying that Stalin's intentions were good, but his actions were evil. He is saying that Stalin didn't use terror and execution for the sake of communism but he dismissed able politicians and army officers because they had different opinions to his. This was done in the interests of Stalin instead of the interests of his people. If Stalin had wanted to help his people then he wouldn't have purged the good army officers. Trotsky and Bukharin for example, were purged because they disagreed with Stalin. Source G could be looked at in 2 ways; it could indicate that Stalin is mad, saying that he was convinced terror and murder were good things. You could also see it as Khrushchev making excuses for Stalin, saying the Stalin thought it was the only way. Although Khrushchev is making excuses for Stalin he only mentions the terror he bought to the country, he mentions nothing of the way Stalin brought industry into the twentieth century. Source H is from the same year as source G, but Khrushchev has become a lot more negative towards Stalin than he was in source G. In source H, Khrushkev is very open, possibly trying to put the point across that he isn't Stalin's heir, and he will do things differently. Source H suggests that everyone that came close to Stalin died. "This suspicion created him a general distrust towards party workers he had known for years" This happened to Bukharin, who was turned upon even after helping Stalin win over Trotsky. From my knowledge I know that there was terror and executions in Russia. Stalin had secret police (NKVD) ...read more.


However, given that almost all of the sources are unreliable I have decided that Stalin had a mixed character. He was a gifted politician but had very cruel and heartless methods of improving the country. 8. Use the sources and your knowledge of Stalin and Soviet history to explain why there has been disagreement about Stalin. The sources all convey a different picture of Stalin. Although most of them are unreliable they still show that Stalin was viewed in many different ways. There are many reasons for this, it was partly because everyone has a slightly different opinion of things to each other, and, as there are so many sources, opinions are bound to differ to quite an extent. The sources were written for many different reasons, and for each different reason there would be a different way of portraying the opinions. The Western countries feared communism and tried to make it look bad. There was lots of propaganda and censorship around this making the majority of the sources unreliable. A good example of propaganda is D, where Stalin is promoting himself as being caring and attentive to detail. This could be a lie, or it could be true, or it could be totally exaggerated out of proportion to make himself look good. There is disagreement about Stalin because everyone had such strong opinions that were different to everyone else's. Because everyone thought differently to each other, people began to exaggerate their reasons for their own opinions, making lots of information we have today very unreliable. Stalin scared people, he urged them on, and by doing this he made Russia what it is today. The price Russia paid for that was the lives of millions. Without the fear Stalin gave people Russia would not be nearly as advanced today, for that Stalin was a great man. It is a matter of whether the freedom of the individual was more important that the freedom of the nation. In the end the USSR was brought into the twentieth century, and equality was provided, but Russia's sacrifices were huge. 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Also I believe if he wanted to spread Communism around the world, he wanted to show to the people of world how working people are treated and what the country has to offer. In conclusion Stalin wanted the best for Russia but didn't care what costs his people had to pay to get there.

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    * This is how the marks are allocated; Level 1 General answers Lacks specific knowledge 1-2 marks Level 2 You describe the reasons rather than explaining them 3-5 marks Level3 You explain the reasons 5-8 marks Level 4 You compare the importance and are able to explain why one reason is more important than the others.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    skulls, therefore suggesting that he is the only man responsible for it. Similarly, in source C Stalin us shown as the only man congratulating the wives of the army officers. Although in very different ways, both sources show Stalin dealing with the Russian people.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    A state-planning agency called GOSPLAN organised the Five Year Plans, to help industrialize Russia, and these were all focused on the heavy industry. Russia had many natural resources, but these were in remote places of the country, so they built industrial cities nearby the mineral region, called Magnitogorsk and Sverdlovsk.

  1. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    It suggests that collectivisation was not entirely voluntary and that those that disagreed, mainly kulaks, paid the ultimate price.[c1] Both sources are official sources from Stalin and talk about the collectivisation policy although the views expressed sharply contradict each other.

  2. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Source 3 however claims that all of the family were shot in Ipatiev house, and then after the murder a lorry took mine them to the Four Brothers mine. Here they were cut up, and then burnt using sulphuric acid and petrol.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    It is hard to tell if this speech was real or sarcastic or just an attempt to stay alive. Things like this were published in papers to show the people that this is how Stalin wants people to think of him.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Almost 300,000 prisoners were set to work on the Belomor Canal with promises that they would be set free when it was completed. By the end of the 1930's there were labour camps in every part of the USSR. Every single one of them was surrounded by watchtowers and barbed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work