• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster? source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Use sources A, B and C: Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Source A clearly shows the negative side of Stalin, as the caption says "...Stalin and the results of his policies" This tells us, relating to the piles of skulls, that Stalin's policy wasn't as successful- the skulls were supposedly drawn to mean the vast amount of dead people in due to Stalin's terror policy. This obviously tells us that Stalin was ruthless, and he did everything, even "sacrificing" his own people, to gain absolute power and totalitarian rule over the Soviet Union. Source B shows Stalin as a good leader, who gets out and meets with the workers and is happy, for we see both Stalin and the workers smiling. - This shows, although in the caption it states, "An official Soviet painting", good impression of Stalin. However the caption tells us that it is clearly a propaganda image, an example of Socialist Realist paintings. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is "written by Stalin in 1945" so straight away we expect something biased and propaganda-like. However we cannot say this is useless because it is biased, it still quotes Stalin and shows what kind of person he was. In this source, we can see how Stalin is trying to make people think he is a "nice" leader who care about people's lives. However historically, we know that this is not true- according to the deaths of millions of Russian people and his well known "corrupt" policies. On the other hand, this also shows that there was a reason Stalin decided to write this, it might have been the reason that he had hidden enemies or his "fame" had cooled and made him feel insecure and wanted the more, and secure attention from the public. Stalin was more than capable of lying to his people just to get more heads turned to him when he's making a point. ...read more.

Conclusion

From historical facts, we know that nothing in the text is true about Stalin. However we see Stalin has managed to make he look like a God, this shows an example "Cult of personality". Source F shows Bukharin showing his negative feelings towards Stalin and criticizing his evil "policy". This is after he "fell into disgrace in 1929" so this is reliable in terms of Bukharin now being an "enemy" of Stalin and having his own freedom of expressing his point of view. However there is a possibility of being exaggerated because he is talking with hatred - "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man, no, not a man, but a devil" Between the two sources, source F is more reliable for those words come out from Bukharin's pure mind, without any force on his back. However source E is surely affected by a greater force and an example of how Stalin controlled ideas. Shin Young Park Year 10 History coursework (rough work) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    This source seems very unreliable as all of Stalin's actions when during his reign as dictator totally contradict that. Stalin was a man who believed that mans life did not matter, if this meant for Russia to progress economically and industrially.

  2. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    [c16] Source D states there was an appeared improvement in agricultural output due to Stalin's collectivisation policy, although it was primarily due to first-rate weather conditions. Service maintains that the improvement did not come from "improved agricultural management" as the collective chairmen elected nothing more than inept communist loyalists.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    In the cartoon, it shows 4 men who are on a show trial. They are all admitting to guilt as if it wasn't a big deal- "Yes I'm guilty!", "Sure, I tried to betray my country", "of course I'm a traitor!", "There's no doubt about my guilt!".

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    The other interpretation is that he is only writing it because he has to. If anyone wrote something criticising Stalin at the time he would probably have been executed. The writer may have been living in fear of his life and of those close to him and written something praising Stalin to keep them safe.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The source could also be used to increase the supporters of Stalin. The impression the reader can build in source C is that Stalin is a much loved person and the way the women are cheering at Stalin, makes Stalin look as though he has a prophetic role and is a religious figure and a well admired person.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    In 1956, on the pretext of promoting the progress of science, Mao Zedong called on intellectuals to "let a hundred flowers bloom, and a hundred schools of thought contend" in the arts and sciences. Heated discussions exposed conflicts that had long existed between intellectuals and the Chinese communist regime, and feelings ran high in Beijing.

  1. Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

    He seems to feel loyal to his communist beliefs as he refers to the fallen man as a 'comrade'. This can show that Stalin was a man that kept his word and was loyal to the Bolsheviks. However, this source can be seen as not as useful as it may

  2. The Russian revolution - source related study.

    He should be quite reliable as the royal family sent him and Britain relied on him so he should be quite a good person to believe. He was also a supporter of the whites, which means he was also against the tsar.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work