• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster? source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Use sources A, B and C: Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Source A clearly shows the negative side of Stalin, as the caption says "...Stalin and the results of his policies" This tells us, relating to the piles of skulls, that Stalin's policy wasn't as successful- the skulls were supposedly drawn to mean the vast amount of dead people in due to Stalin's terror policy. This obviously tells us that Stalin was ruthless, and he did everything, even "sacrificing" his own people, to gain absolute power and totalitarian rule over the Soviet Union. Source B shows Stalin as a good leader, who gets out and meets with the workers and is happy, for we see both Stalin and the workers smiling. - This shows, although in the caption it states, "An official Soviet painting", good impression of Stalin. However the caption tells us that it is clearly a propaganda image, an example of Socialist Realist paintings. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is "written by Stalin in 1945" so straight away we expect something biased and propaganda-like. However we cannot say this is useless because it is biased, it still quotes Stalin and shows what kind of person he was. In this source, we can see how Stalin is trying to make people think he is a "nice" leader who care about people's lives. However historically, we know that this is not true- according to the deaths of millions of Russian people and his well known "corrupt" policies. On the other hand, this also shows that there was a reason Stalin decided to write this, it might have been the reason that he had hidden enemies or his "fame" had cooled and made him feel insecure and wanted the more, and secure attention from the public. Stalin was more than capable of lying to his people just to get more heads turned to him when he's making a point. ...read more.

Conclusion

From historical facts, we know that nothing in the text is true about Stalin. However we see Stalin has managed to make he look like a God, this shows an example "Cult of personality". Source F shows Bukharin showing his negative feelings towards Stalin and criticizing his evil "policy". This is after he "fell into disgrace in 1929" so this is reliable in terms of Bukharin now being an "enemy" of Stalin and having his own freedom of expressing his point of view. However there is a possibility of being exaggerated because he is talking with hatred - "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man, no, not a man, but a devil" Between the two sources, source F is more reliable for those words come out from Bukharin's pure mind, without any force on his back. However source E is surely affected by a greater force and an example of how Stalin controlled ideas. Shin Young Park Year 10 History coursework (rough work) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    During his reign as dictator he was responsible for the death of tens of millions of Russians, which he now tries to justify. The way he justifies his actions is by saying, "When I told them off for having more concern for animals than men."

  2. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    Their new methods of administration and organisation certainly could not have been and upgrading of the old methods, due to lack of expertise on the subject. The increased agricultural output of 1932-3 was not owing to improved agricultural running but beneficial weather conditions and not an effect of the new policy of collectivisation.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    They are admitting as if it was a joke. Most people would just admit to guilt straight away because they knew there would only be one outcome, which was death or labour camps. We can see in the cartoon that just outside the courtroom, the gallows are ready for them.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Krushchev also reveals that he was aware of Stalin's paranoia. The thing that makes this source trustworthy is that Kruschev was second in command to Stalin for many's a year. Just like sources G and H were very comparible so are sources I and J which share similar a topic.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    It set up thousands of new cr�ches and day care centres so that mothers could work. The source could also be used as a means of propaganda to get wives of normal men to be ashamed of their husbands as they are not participating in the protection of the country.

  2. Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

    Stalin had also once said that he 'lost all faith in humanity'. He valued the lives of a few loyal party members over the majority of peasants. For instance during the civil war he led his war train full of food to a place with more loyal Bolsheviks rather than

  1. Stalin : Man or monster

    It is thanking Stalin for everything, claiming that he is great and how they are privileged to see Stalin. It is repetitive and contains many praising words and statements which is an exaggerated way to describe a person. This is from a speech of a writer of the congress of

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The definition of "landlord" was highly arbitrary, as many actually controlled very small amounts of land. Millions were executed in this bloody movement. State control and development of industry were based on the Soviet model, which favored heavy industry. In the 1950s, the Soviet Union provided specialists, planning, and loans

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work