• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster? source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Use sources A, B and C: Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Source A clearly shows the negative side of Stalin, as the caption says "...Stalin and the results of his policies" This tells us, relating to the piles of skulls, that Stalin's policy wasn't as successful- the skulls were supposedly drawn to mean the vast amount of dead people in due to Stalin's terror policy. This obviously tells us that Stalin was ruthless, and he did everything, even "sacrificing" his own people, to gain absolute power and totalitarian rule over the Soviet Union. Source B shows Stalin as a good leader, who gets out and meets with the workers and is happy, for we see both Stalin and the workers smiling. - This shows, although in the caption it states, "An official Soviet painting", good impression of Stalin. However the caption tells us that it is clearly a propaganda image, an example of Socialist Realist paintings. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is "written by Stalin in 1945" so straight away we expect something biased and propaganda-like. However we cannot say this is useless because it is biased, it still quotes Stalin and shows what kind of person he was. In this source, we can see how Stalin is trying to make people think he is a "nice" leader who care about people's lives. However historically, we know that this is not true- according to the deaths of millions of Russian people and his well known "corrupt" policies. On the other hand, this also shows that there was a reason Stalin decided to write this, it might have been the reason that he had hidden enemies or his "fame" had cooled and made him feel insecure and wanted the more, and secure attention from the public. Stalin was more than capable of lying to his people just to get more heads turned to him when he's making a point. ...read more.

Conclusion

From historical facts, we know that nothing in the text is true about Stalin. However we see Stalin has managed to make he look like a God, this shows an example "Cult of personality". Source F shows Bukharin showing his negative feelings towards Stalin and criticizing his evil "policy". This is after he "fell into disgrace in 1929" so this is reliable in terms of Bukharin now being an "enemy" of Stalin and having his own freedom of expressing his point of view. However there is a possibility of being exaggerated because he is talking with hatred - "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man, no, not a man, but a devil" Between the two sources, source F is more reliable for those words come out from Bukharin's pure mind, without any force on his back. However source E is surely affected by a greater force and an example of how Stalin controlled ideas. Shin Young Park Year 10 History coursework (rough work) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    This source seems very unreliable as all of Stalin's actions when during his reign as dictator totally contradict that. Stalin was a man who believed that mans life did not matter, if this meant for Russia to progress economically and industrially.

  2. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    [c16] Source D states there was an appeared improvement in agricultural output due to Stalin's collectivisation policy, although it was primarily due to first-rate weather conditions. Service maintains that the improvement did not come from "improved agricultural management" as the collective chairmen elected nothing more than inept communist loyalists.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    They are admitting as if it was a joke. Most people would just admit to guilt straight away because they knew there would only be one outcome, which was death or labour camps. We can see in the cartoon that just outside the courtroom, the gallows are ready for them.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Question 8 Stalin was a man with excellent results but not one with super formulas. Stalin's best result was helping Russia climb to the top of the ladder in world superpower. Some historians may argue that at one time Russia was on the same level as U.S.A in terms of superpower status.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The sources are similar in different ways. The first similarity between the sources is that Source A and B are printed in the 1930's the same time frame suggesting a particular point of time. Source C is not dated thus gives the source insignificance because it could be referring to

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    One of the first post-1949 ideological movements began with the Korean War in 1950, when anti-U.S. and pro-North Korea propaganda was used to mobilize support for the war. Always suspicious of their support for the communist revolution, Mao regularly launched fierce attacks against intellectuals.

  1. Stalin : Man or monster

    It is thanking Stalin for everything, claiming that he is great and how they are privileged to see Stalin. It is repetitive and contains many praising words and statements which is an exaggerated way to describe a person. This is from a speech of a writer of the congress of

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    The proletariat did not exist in a form that could carry on its shoulders the levers of political power. No government decree could alter this fact. Lenin recognised the dangers and took measures to at least partially alleviate the situation. But there was no solution outside of the world revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work