• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster? source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Use sources A, B and C: Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Source A clearly shows the negative side of Stalin, as the caption says "...Stalin and the results of his policies" This tells us, relating to the piles of skulls, that Stalin's policy wasn't as successful- the skulls were supposedly drawn to mean the vast amount of dead people in due to Stalin's terror policy. This obviously tells us that Stalin was ruthless, and he did everything, even "sacrificing" his own people, to gain absolute power and totalitarian rule over the Soviet Union. Source B shows Stalin as a good leader, who gets out and meets with the workers and is happy, for we see both Stalin and the workers smiling. - This shows, although in the caption it states, "An official Soviet painting", good impression of Stalin. However the caption tells us that it is clearly a propaganda image, an example of Socialist Realist paintings. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is "written by Stalin in 1945" so straight away we expect something biased and propaganda-like. However we cannot say this is useless because it is biased, it still quotes Stalin and shows what kind of person he was. In this source, we can see how Stalin is trying to make people think he is a "nice" leader who care about people's lives. However historically, we know that this is not true- according to the deaths of millions of Russian people and his well known "corrupt" policies. On the other hand, this also shows that there was a reason Stalin decided to write this, it might have been the reason that he had hidden enemies or his "fame" had cooled and made him feel insecure and wanted the more, and secure attention from the public. Stalin was more than capable of lying to his people just to get more heads turned to him when he's making a point. ...read more.

Conclusion

From historical facts, we know that nothing in the text is true about Stalin. However we see Stalin has managed to make he look like a God, this shows an example "Cult of personality". Source F shows Bukharin showing his negative feelings towards Stalin and criticizing his evil "policy". This is after he "fell into disgrace in 1929" so this is reliable in terms of Bukharin now being an "enemy" of Stalin and having his own freedom of expressing his point of view. However there is a possibility of being exaggerated because he is talking with hatred - "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man, no, not a man, but a devil" Between the two sources, source F is more reliable for those words come out from Bukharin's pure mind, without any force on his back. However source E is surely affected by a greater force and an example of how Stalin controlled ideas. Shin Young Park Year 10 History coursework (rough work) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    During his reign as dictator he was responsible for the death of tens of millions of Russians, which he now tries to justify. The way he justifies his actions is by saying, "When I told them off for having more concern for animals than men."

  2. The USSR under Stalin, 1924-1941 - source related questions.

    [c16] Source D states there was an appeared improvement in agricultural output due to Stalin's collectivisation policy, although it was primarily due to first-rate weather conditions. Service maintains that the improvement did not come from "improved agricultural management" as the collective chairmen elected nothing more than inept communist loyalists.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    They are admitting as if it was a joke. Most people would just admit to guilt straight away because they knew there would only be one outcome, which was death or labour camps. We can see in the cartoon that just outside the courtroom, the gallows are ready for them.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    They were also both written after Stalin had died. Both these sources are trusty and reveal that although Stalin was a very barbaric man he was still a very skilled and successful leader of Russia. The source more or less says that though Stalin worked tirelessly for the rise of his country, the value of human life was succumb to this and so had to give way.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Source C portrays amongst a crowd the wives of army officer cheering and commending Stalin. This could be because of Propaganda in order to encourage more women to work as there was a shortage of workers. Thus the government concentrated on drafting more women into industry.

  2. Stalin : Man or monster

    The comments made in the source are insulting and the source is an attempt to reveal Stalin's true evilness to the public. "Stalin is unhappy at not being able to convince everyone, himself included, that he is greater than everyone else" This suggests that Bukharin is identifying Stalin's insecurity about his ability as leader.

  1. Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

    have been used as propaganda by Stalin to show him to be a caring leader and show him to regard all his subjects as equal and most people regard someone as a tyrant throughout his life. Stalin said that 'one death is a tragedy, one million is a statistic' this undervaluing of human life is well known by historians.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The definition of "landlord" was highly arbitrary, as many actually controlled very small amounts of land. Millions were executed in this bloody movement. State control and development of industry were based on the Soviet model, which favored heavy industry. In the 1950s, the Soviet Union provided specialists, planning, and loans

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work