• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster? source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin: Man or Monster? 1. Use sources A, B and C: Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Source A clearly shows the negative side of Stalin, as the caption says "...Stalin and the results of his policies" This tells us, relating to the piles of skulls, that Stalin's policy wasn't as successful- the skulls were supposedly drawn to mean the vast amount of dead people in due to Stalin's terror policy. This obviously tells us that Stalin was ruthless, and he did everything, even "sacrificing" his own people, to gain absolute power and totalitarian rule over the Soviet Union. Source B shows Stalin as a good leader, who gets out and meets with the workers and is happy, for we see both Stalin and the workers smiling. - This shows, although in the caption it states, "An official Soviet painting", good impression of Stalin. However the caption tells us that it is clearly a propaganda image, an example of Socialist Realist paintings. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is "written by Stalin in 1945" so straight away we expect something biased and propaganda-like. However we cannot say this is useless because it is biased, it still quotes Stalin and shows what kind of person he was. In this source, we can see how Stalin is trying to make people think he is a "nice" leader who care about people's lives. However historically, we know that this is not true- according to the deaths of millions of Russian people and his well known "corrupt" policies. On the other hand, this also shows that there was a reason Stalin decided to write this, it might have been the reason that he had hidden enemies or his "fame" had cooled and made him feel insecure and wanted the more, and secure attention from the public. Stalin was more than capable of lying to his people just to get more heads turned to him when he's making a point. ...read more.

Conclusion

From historical facts, we know that nothing in the text is true about Stalin. However we see Stalin has managed to make he look like a God, this shows an example "Cult of personality". Source F shows Bukharin showing his negative feelings towards Stalin and criticizing his evil "policy". This is after he "fell into disgrace in 1929" so this is reliable in terms of Bukharin now being an "enemy" of Stalin and having his own freedom of expressing his point of view. However there is a possibility of being exaggerated because he is talking with hatred - "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man, no, not a man, but a devil" Between the two sources, source F is more reliable for those words come out from Bukharin's pure mind, without any force on his back. However source E is surely affected by a greater force and an example of how Stalin controlled ideas. Shin Young Park Year 10 History coursework (rough work) 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Molotov was to describe it differently. Late in his life, Molotov believed that Stalin would be rehabilitated. He denied that Stalin was behind Kirov's murder, and he blamed others for what he called excesses. He claimed that Stalin knew little about the purges - although Stalin signed death warrants sometimes

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Ostobrists, 11-16 year olds were called the pioneers and young people over 16 were called the Komsomol. Before Stalin came to power in 1919 a women's department of the central committee called the Zhenotdel, it encouraged free abortion, female literacy, made it easier for women to get a divorce and have more women working.

  1. Assignment B: Stalin: Man or Monster

    He affected all areas of society, even the army where one in five officers were removed from their posts including Marshal Tukhachevsky, the supreme commander of the army. Stalin's policies are echoed in source A with the pyramids of skulls.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    In source G, Khrushchev is talking about how he believed that "Stalin was convinced that the use of terror and executions was necessary for the defence of socialism and communism." He believed that Stalin had good intentions when he used the purges to kill millions of people.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    skulls, therefore suggesting that he is the only man responsible for it. Similarly, in source C Stalin us shown as the only man congratulating the wives of the army officers. Although in very different ways, both sources show Stalin dealing with the Russian people.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    where the end of their lives was met. Nearly every family in the Soviet Union had lost someone to the purges, where raids in the middle of the nights took place and some people "simply disappeared." Source A thus gives an impression of an evil Stalin, portraying him as an

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    to help build Chinese industry, and thousands were sent to the Soviet Union for education and training. Beijing's first five-year plan began in 1953 and was patterned after the Soviet five-year plans. It included the goals of socialist industrialization and the socialist transformation of agriculture, light and heavy industry, and commerce, all in successive phases.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Anti-Stalin themes are clearly prevalent in Source M. The two phrases that attack Stalin are, "monstrous tyrant" and "corrupted by absolute power." It is very obvious from the source that the British historian is saying that Stalin was a very harsh and callous man.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work