• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


HISTORY COURSEWORK STALIN: MAN OR MONSTER 1) Source A gives us the impression of Stalin being a murderer, as there are pyramids of human skulls. This could represent the huge amounts of people he had killed, through labour or work camps. I know from my own knowledge and after studying Russia under Stalin's rule that Stalin was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Therefore this source gives us a pretty good overview of what Stalin was like. Also we can sense a satisfaction or pride that Stalin has from himself after looking at source A. This can be sensed as Stalin is pointing to all the skulls as if it was a thing to be proud of. There is also a caption in the source saying "Visitez L'U.R.S.S. ses pyramides!" Which is another thing that the author uses to show us, Stalin's pride. Source B on the other hand gives us a completely different impression of Stalin. We see him in this source as a good leader that takes interest in his workers. The people shown (who are probably lower class workers) and Stalin are happy on the picture and it gives an impression of a happy, well ruled Russia. The picture is saying that Stalin is a carrying ruler and that he takes interest in even the low class people. Source C seems to give a more similar impression to source B. It seems to show Stalin yet again as a man in a good relationship with his people; even a gentleman. In source C Stalin is shaking hands with the wives of the soldiers, the woman are happy and yet again we get a similar impression to source B of Stalin loving his people and them loving him. Sources B and C give a very different impression about Stalin to source A, but tend to give a rather similar impression of the USSR leader between themselves. ...read more.


The two sources do not agree about show trials as simply one of them does not cover this topic, but they agree far on how things were run in the Soviet Union. By Stalin only with no opposition. They both also give a similar impression. I know from studding Stalin Russia that Stalin actually never or very rarely attended the show trials and it is obvious that he wasn't everything in the Supreme Soviet like shown in J. The two sources are telling us that even thought Stalin was not present in person he and his ideas and way of running was around everywhere and the people where like puppets did everything Stalin wanted them to. Even though the two sources do not agree far on show trials they give us a similar overview, and we can guess that the show trials were from Stalin's orders and probably fake and unfair; as many things were in Russia at that time. 6) Source L says about Stalin that he was a skilled and a gifted politician while source M agrees that he was a politician but a ruthless politician that turned into a monstrous tyrant due to the corruption of power. Even though the two sources are both from biographies of Stalin, they have differences in them. Source L points out to us that Stalin was one of the greatest political figures of the twentieth century, while we read in source M that he was a ruthless politician a tyrant that terrorised men to keep obedient and for people to believe in him. These words are not words to describe one of the greatest political figures, but to describe an evil man that could not hold on to power with out using normal methods but only by using terror. However, in saying that, that source M tells us about the wrong's of Stalin "he was corrupted by absolute power. ...read more.


However is does not end there, we also see another side where Stalin is not a monster nor a brilliant leader but a paranoid man and perhaps even with mental disorders. This we can learn from sources F and H. So, as we see Stalin can be seen differ depending on what side of him you look at. Not everyone looks at the same or all sides and therefore we get disagreement. A matter that influences the reason for disagreement is the fact that we get new evidence all the time which is more up to date and correct; those who have not yet seen the new evidence would disagree with those that have. For example source M from 1947 just informs us how evil Stalin is leading people to believe that, but then we see source L from1983 that gives us two points of view. Agreeing that Stalin was evil but also pointing out he was a skilled politician. As well there is the issue of writing in the cold war, some sources were written in the cold war, were there was a lot of tension among nations. If a source is from America or any other allies country such as Britain or France then obviously it will be harsh towards Stalin such as source J published in the 1930's in France, saying that Stalin is all selfish and doe snot allow opposition. If the source is from Russia then obviously it will be positive towards Stalin. Of course simple things like how you were brought up or what you once heard influence the people, which later causes disagreement with those who were brought up otherwise or taught differently. In conclusion the reason for such huge disagreement about Stalin, is because people deal with different sources, they hear different things, people have different views. And mainly because Stalin and Russia had so many different angles to it, and everyone sees a different Russia at that time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess The Impact Of Stalin On Russia And The Russian People.

    4 star(s)

    The Soviet Union stayed male dominated whilst Stalin was in power. Not a single woman was in high office whilst Stalin was in command. In conclusion, Stalin's work on the peasants proved to work. This was due to the harsh system of collectivisation.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    into Russia in terms of industry and farming, however it was these ideas that lead to Russia becoming stronger. He relied heavily on manufactured western goods, this had to change and Stalin knew it they had to become self-sufficient. Stalin knew an industrial base was needed to produce goods to their people, to become self-sufficient.

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    3-6 marks 4. Why did Tsar Nicholas survive the 1905 Revolution? (6) The main reason that Tsar survived was October Manifesto. October Manifesto consisted of three things. The three things were the Duma, freedom of speech and the non censorship.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    The unpredictability that lead to so many people fearing him. This stopped people opposing him, and by removing senior party members he was getting rid of any rivals that may threaten his region as Russian leader. In a way, it also gained him a little trust, as he was shown

  1. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    He blamed the failure to achieve these targets on the sabotage of certain elements of society, particularly the Kulak class of rich peasants, as created by Stolypin, in an attempt to preserve the Tsarist system. The existence of this class is debatable, certainly, the numbers of Kulaks was nothing like

  2. Assessment on whether Stalin was a necessary evil.

    industries were left idle because broken machinery could not be quickly repaired due to bureaucratic delays. The pressure to reach unrealistic targets resulted in the production of unusable goods because speed and volume was valued over quality. Many industrial workers were ex-peasants, who had not been given the opportunity to

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Source B is another example of propaganda, the source implies that collectivisation was popular amongst the Soviet people. The women in the photograph seem very happy to be with him again showing Stalin as a "friend of the people". The source agrees with source A and shows Stalin as being actively involved with his policies.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    If those at the top of the Communist Party and an old revolutionary like Trotsky could join the enemy, what about lesser people. In factories and offices, mass meetings were held in which people were urged to be vigilant against sabotage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work