• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin: political figure or tyrannical monster?

Extracts from this document...


G.C.S.E HISTORY COURSEWORK-ASIGNMENT B STALIN: political figure or tyrannical monster? 7. There has always been different views held by people towards Stalin, and since his death in 1953 these views have escalated. The reason there are many different views is because no one knows the real truth about Stalin and the regime that he ran. For example he had censorship agencies set up that only allowed articles praising him to be published, he literally had history re-written and he also used 'the cult of Stalin' to build himself up more. Due to these things being set up no one knows what really happened and the real truth about Stalin, and so they are now inclined to make up a lot of things, and guess a lot about him as well. Source 'D' is an example of one of the things Stalin had re-written. We know the things he says are untrue but it is due to things like these that people are uncertain about Stalin because they do not know what to believe about him. This source may be used to support the idea that Stalin did not help Russia because he is denying the Russian people the truth about their country's history. However it certainly does support how clever and devious Stalin was as a leader, doing anything he could to gain popularity and support. ...read more.


However source 'H' was written so long after Stalin rule that the writer would not really have known what it was like at the time in Russia or the mood of the people towards Stalin. Also if historians were to look at sources such as 'I' and 'J', which have reference to the 'show trials', they would again question whether Stalin helped Russia. Source 'I' gives the impression that Stalin himself was very unfair and the 'show trails' were not fair and were a mockery, simply people being 'puppets' (as source 'J' puts it) who would admit to anything because of the pressure they were put under. Many historians believe these sorts of things out weigh the good things Stalin did for Russia. However many historians believe things such as the five year plans out-weigh the bad things he did for Russia. Sources such as source 'B' support this idea that under Stalin, Russia, in such a short period of time, was turned around industrially and was able to build such a huge industrial empire, mainly due to Stalin himself. This source shows what is probably the Dneiper Dam in the background, one of Russia's most significant achievements that they were very willing to show off. It also shows Stalin with the workers, which gives the impression that Stalin genuinely cared about the Russian workers and was a man of the people. ...read more.


It was during this time, the late 1930's, that many historians believe Stalin was not particularly helpful to Russia. Sources like 'F' support this. Source 'F' was written in 1936 and tells us how Stalin was 'a devil' and reminds us how Stalin was not concerned to kill anybody that he thought was a threat to him; 'if someone speaks better than he does, that man is for it!'. However the reliability of this source can be questioned as it was written by Bukharin, one of Stalin's enemies who tried to gain power after Lenin's death. It is sources like this one that encouraged historians to later write sources similar after Stalin's death. Sources such as 'L', which was written in 1974 and is similar to source 'F' in the way that it criticises Stalin's leadership; 'absolute power turned a ruthless politician into a monstrous tyrant'. However like source 'F' this source is probably referring to his mid years in charge when the Purges were on. It is very unlikely that this historian could write the same thing with reference to his leadership during World War II, as it was him who helped to guide Russia through it. Although Stalin may have been a nice person, due to the regime that he ran and also that he did not let anybody get close to him during his life, historians now speculate that he was a very evil, even criminal man simply because of how he ran Russia. Olly Sargent 11Y PJD ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Rationing was abolished in 1936, as the rationing of bread and meat was scrapped in 1935. Consequently due to Industrialisation unemployment levels fell also some reports do suggest that the workers were satisfied with the working conditions. Unfortunately for workers Stalin changed their working days by revealing that instead of

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    after which they were executed, imprisoned or sent to a labour camp where they were worked to death. These two sources are both pieces of propaganda against Stalin. They are both about Stalin's show trials and both show how he ruled them completely and emphasises how they were absurd.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    In source C, Stalin deals with the wives of the army officers and seems very polite, and is reaching to the wives, instead of the wives reaching to him; this again shows Stalin's modesty. In source A he proudly points at the skull pyramids of the Russian people.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Propaganda encouraged the workers to put aside their unhappiness and use their goodwill to the governments need. Source B portrays Stalin in a very positive light, liked by workers dressed in military clothing but its is white rather then green this gives the impression of purity cleanliness, discipline and removes

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    way overshadows the effort of the workers under his own personal splendour as his figure was enlarged in the poster so he looks above anyone else to blatantly convey that "Stalin is behind everything" and that all the country's workers respect him and follow his ambitious orders.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    In Stalin's tenure as leader this cost was very great. However Source L is not totally commendatory to Stalin. It also tells us of how Stalin was a harsh man with a "dark and evil" personality. From our own knowledge we can agree with this because we know that he murdered 30 million civilians.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Have the Chinese people been better off in each of these areas since the death of Mao? Explain your answer. The Cultural Revolution was not officially ended until 1977 but it had passed its worse excesses by 1972, and a balance of power between left wing and right, radicals and moderates was established.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    weaponry and for that reason consumer industries lagged behind even though they were showing signs of recovery. Altogether, the Five Year Plans were always declared complete a year in advance because this meant that the Soviet would get much recognition and exposure over the Western capitalist economies, which were going through the Great Depression.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work