• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Stalin showed a surprising pragmatism and readiness to compromise in seeking to secure Soviet interests in Europe in the period 1943- June 1945". Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Stalin showed a surprising pragmatism and readiness to compromise in seeking to secure Soviet interests in Europe in the period 1943- June 1945". Discuss. In the period of 1943-45, Stalin made a number of compromises, with regard to his interests, in the policies he had imposed on the countries liberated by the Soviet forces. For fear of the Western Powers, Stalin had adopted policies that he hoped would not antagonise them in any way; this was so that he was free to be able to consolidate power in these countries at a later date. In the liberated territories Stalin had advised the local Communists to form alliances with the Liberal, Socialist and Peasant parties; forming coalitions that brought Communism into government. ...read more.

Middle

Though at first it appeared that Stalin showed a surprising pragmatism in trying to secure his interests, he in fact was perfectly in control, and by having this committee set up he did not compromise, he simply covered up his real intentions of a forthcoming regime within Poland. His real policy was revealed when the Polish Home Army rose up to Germans in Warsaw in August 1944. Stalin then went on to impose his policies, and by January 1945 had achieved a communist dominated Committee acting as the provisional government for Poland. As in Poland, Stalin appeared to show a surprising amount of compromise when persuading Bulgarian communists to pursue a moderate policy, which would also involve tolerating political opposition and to work within a Patriotic Front Coalition. ...read more.

Conclusion

consolidation of power, however it did give Stalin an advantage in that this had effectively legitimised Communism as a party and allowed them to work from within the government. This was the general pattern throughout Stalin's consolidation of communist power within Eastern Europe, and although it appears he is making a large compromise in terms of his interests, the compromises and pragmatism he shows acts as a cover for his long term plans. Therefore Stalin did show the readiness to compromise and act pragmatically in securing his interests, but this is simply how it was perceived by the USA and the British, when in actual fact, Stalin did act in his own interests throughout the liberation of Europe, but did so without conflicting with the Western Powers in any way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How effectively did the Soviet Union control Eastern Europe from 1945 to 1968?

    Stalin was able to keep such a tight 'following' due to the fear and propaganda that followed his infamous Red army. He had placed them within his sphere as a warning to the people. If they opposed, they would be dealt with by the Red Army through means of 're-education'.

  2. Stalin’s Application of Communism

    The Five-Year Plan was to cover the years 1928-33. The purpose of the plan was to increase the socialist sector of agriculture. According to Ulam, this plan may have reasonably been expected to be completed in ten years. Nonetheless, Stalin believed the Soviet Union had to industrialize rapidly in order to strengthen the Communist regime and enable the country to defend itself against foreign enemies.

  1. Did Stalin pervert the message of the "real communists?"

    How long was this 'temporary' period of dictatorship? How was the party supposed to organize their members and how much force was necessary (or perhaps permissible) before the population would accept the communist ideals? Even though Marx's works left much room for perversions the main ideas upon which a communist society should be based were clear, i.e.

  2. The Soviet state was established at the expense of Soviet people - discuss.

    Besides, this also caused great pressure upon the industry workers: each record, often made under special, beneficial circumstances by especially skilled workers using new methods, Stakhanovities, set the production norms that were to be fulfilled by the workers higher and higher.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    In an interview that he gave in Moscow to a correspondent for New York's Daily Worker, Robeson is reported as saying that wherever he turned in Moscow he had found happiness and "bounding life, the feeling of safety and abundance of freedom."

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    Russia suffered its worst famine of the nineteenth century, costing 1.5 - 2 million lives as well as brutally exposing the shortcomings of government policy. The catastrophe of the famine cost Vyshnegradsky his job and he was replaced by Sergei Witte in 1892.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work