• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin Coursework 7.) Using all the sources in this booklet and your own knowledge explain why there has been so much disagreement about Stalin. There are many sources in the booklet that show Stalin to be a great leader, but on the other hand there are also many sources that show him to be a dark and evil man. For example sources B and C show Stalin doing good things. Source B is a painting of him stood with workers in front of a newly opened hydroelectric power station. Source C shows him congratulating the wives of army officers. Then there is source A, a cartoon, which shows him standing before millions of skulls stacked in the shape of the pyramids. ...read more.

Middle

Bukharin, who once supported Stalin, made a speech in Paris in 1936, but was a victim of Stalin's purges in 1938. Bukharin disliked Stalin greatly and spoke ill of him. Bukharin describes Stalin as being a, "narrow-minded, malicious man" and then he says, "no, not a man but a devil." My background knowledge tells me that what Bukharin said was true because Stalin saw every one as a threat. He disliked anyone he thought was better than him and most often that man wouldn't live. The speech in source E only talks about how great Stalin was and that he made Russia great again, but what it doesn't say is what it cost Russia to gain this power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Again, this source too describes Stalin as being nothing but a perfect man and leader. On the other hand Source L is also from a biography of Stalin but published in 1983 in Britain. This is one of the sources which is not biased and gives both sides of Stalin. The source says, "Stalin was a very skilled, indeed gifted politician... This does not mean that he was a good man. He had a dark and evil side to his nature." In conclusion Stalin did some great things in his time in power. However he also committed some monstrous atrocities during his time in power. The major disagreements about Stalin come from his atrocities and his leadership qualities. Some people believe he was a great politician and others believe he was an evil man. In actual fact he was both of these. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    Thirdly, the soldiers were badly led by their officers. Most of the officers didn't even care about what happened in the war. The soldiers didn't like that, as a result of this and the shameful loses, 1917 many of the soldiers joined the Revolutionary Bolsheviks party.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Stalin and made Stalin feel intimidated by this and falsely accused Bukharin for spying for Japan and Germany and also plotting with Trotsky. In this source the most important message that Bukharin is trying to convey is that Stalin was still trying to convince everyone else and himself that he is the greatest to ever walk the earth.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    I also know that Stalin clearly did not care that much for mankind because by getting rid of millions of people was his way of improving a country. Source E is another example showing that Stalin was a great leader.

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Source J was published in France. Although France was not a particularly strong rival of the USSR we know that many of Stalin's political enemies were exiled there (such as Bukharin in source F) and would speak out against him from there. The cartoon shows a courtroom with Stalin everywhere, in the judge's chair, as the prosecutor, as the jurors and making the transcript.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Source D is a written account by Stalin in the year of 1945. The source is based on a recollection by Stalin in the past when he was living in exile in Siberia. The source is a portrayal of a time when one of Stalin's comrade went missing where

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    this rotten way of live" Source I seemed to think that the Cultural Revolution should in fact go on until all bourgeois attitude no longer exist in China. But source J had a different opinion towards the effect of the Cultural Revolution, as he mentioned , " The Cultural Revolution

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    be extremely dangerous to him as he is insulting the leader of Russia: "He is a narrow-minded, malicious man..." In conclusion, both sources are unreliable because they are both very opinionated. However, Source F can be definitely more reliable because it wasn't published under the influence of the government.

  2. Stalin, Man or Monster? Source based questions.

    Stalin reversed the roles to gain support of people. I don't think this source provides any useful information other than showing what a two faced man Stalin was, not only was he causing the deaths of millions of people he was also getting support from those same people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work