• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin Coursework 7.) Using all the sources in this booklet and your own knowledge explain why there has been so much disagreement about Stalin. There are many sources in the booklet that show Stalin to be a great leader, but on the other hand there are also many sources that show him to be a dark and evil man. For example sources B and C show Stalin doing good things. Source B is a painting of him stood with workers in front of a newly opened hydroelectric power station. Source C shows him congratulating the wives of army officers. Then there is source A, a cartoon, which shows him standing before millions of skulls stacked in the shape of the pyramids. ...read more.

Middle

Bukharin, who once supported Stalin, made a speech in Paris in 1936, but was a victim of Stalin's purges in 1938. Bukharin disliked Stalin greatly and spoke ill of him. Bukharin describes Stalin as being a, "narrow-minded, malicious man" and then he says, "no, not a man but a devil." My background knowledge tells me that what Bukharin said was true because Stalin saw every one as a threat. He disliked anyone he thought was better than him and most often that man wouldn't live. The speech in source E only talks about how great Stalin was and that he made Russia great again, but what it doesn't say is what it cost Russia to gain this power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Again, this source too describes Stalin as being nothing but a perfect man and leader. On the other hand Source L is also from a biography of Stalin but published in 1983 in Britain. This is one of the sources which is not biased and gives both sides of Stalin. The source says, "Stalin was a very skilled, indeed gifted politician... This does not mean that he was a good man. He had a dark and evil side to his nature." In conclusion Stalin did some great things in his time in power. However he also committed some monstrous atrocities during his time in power. The major disagreements about Stalin come from his atrocities and his leadership qualities. Some people believe he was a great politician and others believe he was an evil man. In actual fact he was both of these. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    On October 1st 1949, the Communists proclaimed the existence of a new kind of China - The People's Republic of China. The only remaining part of China under Communist control was the island of Taiwan. The chairman of the Communist Party was Mao Zedong.

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    And another reason was that the Tsar appointed Stolypin as the prime minister to stay in power. Stolypin appointed him because he used the carrot and stick method. The carrot system meant to do some good things. For example, he improved the education in Russia; he made it easier for the peasants to buy lands and also cleared their debts.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Stalin didn't seem to care that he was killing millions of people and destroying countless lives for his own aim. This would definitely make him a monster in my view. Another source that shows Stalin as a monster is source F.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The first is saying how he was a good leader, but the second is saying how he had a distrustful personality. How can you have a distrustful but good leader? It is also known that Khrushchev organised a programme of "de-Stalinisation".

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    All three sources are similar in a way that all of them involve Stalin in some way associated with the Russian people. Also, all of them have some truth in them. They are all very different as each one shows a different aspect of Stalin and how he dealt with Russian people while he was in power.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    The source could also be used to increase the supporters of Stalin. The impression the reader can build in source C is that Stalin is a much loved person and the way the women are cheering at Stalin, makes Stalin look as though he has a prophetic role and is a religious figure and a well admired person.

  1. Stalin: Man or monster?

    It is difficult to evaluate the reliability of these sources, as they are both personal opinions based upon experiences of Stalin, very opposite experiences. Despite this, I believe that source F is more reliable. This is because source E would have been completely 'manufactured' by the communist government in order to give the best possible impression of Stalin.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    They feared Stalin immensely and had no freedom of speech, which is represented by the prison in the cartoon. Life was very hard for civilians of the USSR around this period, as new cities were being built to manufacture goods and try to get USSR to become a powerful force once more.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work