• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin - Which of these two sources is more reliable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE History Coursework Assignment 2. 3: Which of these two sources is more reliable? I think source E is not reliable because it is written for a speech, which was to be given to the congress of Soviets in 1935, this speech was also published in the Pravda, the newspaper of the communist party. These two things tell us that the source is unreliable, because it is an official speech and an official speech about Stalin will always be supporting him, because Stalin is the head of the government and he wouldn't criticize himself. "Every time I have found myself in his presence I have been overcome by his strength, his charm, his greatness", this statement shows the unreliability of this source ...read more.

Middle

He tries to portray himself as a god like figure that has came to Russia and drive it into the ways of the future. He wanted the people of Russia to see him as a strong revolutionary figure, who should be thanked by everyone and loved by all. I think that source F is unreliably but less so than source E. Source F is written by a Bukharin who is in exile in France. Bukharin is an old ally Stalin's of Stalin in 1926 when Stalin was climbing to power. Stalin & Bukharin worked together against Kamenev and Zinoviev, so they could get them expelled from the communist party. ...read more.

Conclusion

So source E is biased supporting Stalin because a person who supports Stalin has written it. Source F is biased because a person Stalin has betrayed has written it, lied to, had exiled from Russia and wants them killed, so he will be against Stalin. None of these sources can be completely believed because people with different points of view have written then and no source can be completely neutral. So, I think F is a more reliably source because although it has been written by a person who is against Stalin, but he also knows him very well, having been involved in his rise to power for five years. Page 1 of 2 pages. Philip. Gonsalves 07/05/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Source I and J suggest Stalin to be a controlling person. In source I, Stalin knows the outcome of the 4 people trial. There was almost no point as the gallows were already ready for them and so they just admitted straight away because there was no use fighting.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The phrase "cult of personality" could be attributed to Stalin as he lavished praise but detested critiscism. Krushchev is implementing the same tactic that Stalin used on Lenin, he is attempting to denounce Stalin of his power and prestige. Krushchev is very aware of the fact that although Stalin is

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    force that no nation could ignore - or would ignore at its peril. Internally, the events in Tiananmen Square had repercussions as various factions within the government sought to apportion blame, and thus gain political power. However, despite a period of slight instability, Deng retained his overall control, and his

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    foundations of socialist economy and the hostile powers of moribund capitalism can still deprive us of that. We must clearly appreciate this and frankly admit it; for there is nothing more dangerous than illusions� And there is absolutely nothing terrible � in admitting this bitter truth; for we have always

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    When Bukharin says: ��Stalin is unhappy at not being able to convince everyone.�� This is true because he wanted to control everything and everyone, no matter its consequences.. Evidence which proves this statement is the collectivisation policy he introduced in which millions of people died and others were totally opposed

  2. Stalin and Russia - Sources Question

    Stalin never told anyone anything and put very little trust in any man. 3. When we look at both the sources we can see that they have both been given dates and tell us about where the extracts came from. This is a good source of reliability for both sources.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    distorted the information they gathered from Sergeyev exaggerated it against the Bolscheviks. This may be the reason why the reliability of sources A and B decrease dramatically when we consider the fact that they are both interpretations of two journalists about the executions that took place in the Ipatiev House

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    worried about what people think of him and therefore trying to present himself as a nice and caring leader while at the same time giving the message that the other leaders are 'bad' and do not care for the ordinary Russian people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work