• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stalin - Which of these two sources is more reliable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE History Coursework Assignment 2. 3: Which of these two sources is more reliable? I think source E is not reliable because it is written for a speech, which was to be given to the congress of Soviets in 1935, this speech was also published in the Pravda, the newspaper of the communist party. These two things tell us that the source is unreliable, because it is an official speech and an official speech about Stalin will always be supporting him, because Stalin is the head of the government and he wouldn't criticize himself. "Every time I have found myself in his presence I have been overcome by his strength, his charm, his greatness", this statement shows the unreliability of this source ...read more.

Middle

He tries to portray himself as a god like figure that has came to Russia and drive it into the ways of the future. He wanted the people of Russia to see him as a strong revolutionary figure, who should be thanked by everyone and loved by all. I think that source F is unreliably but less so than source E. Source F is written by a Bukharin who is in exile in France. Bukharin is an old ally Stalin's of Stalin in 1926 when Stalin was climbing to power. Stalin & Bukharin worked together against Kamenev and Zinoviev, so they could get them expelled from the communist party. ...read more.

Conclusion

So source E is biased supporting Stalin because a person who supports Stalin has written it. Source F is biased because a person Stalin has betrayed has written it, lied to, had exiled from Russia and wants them killed, so he will be against Stalin. None of these sources can be completely believed because people with different points of view have written then and no source can be completely neutral. So, I think F is a more reliably source because although it has been written by a person who is against Stalin, but he also knows him very well, having been involved in his rise to power for five years. Page 1 of 2 pages. Philip. Gonsalves 07/05/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    These sources suggest Stalin was more a monster than a man. Source M was from a biography of Stalin, published in 1974 in Britain. This source suggests that Stalin was a monster. "Absolute turned a ruthless politician into a monstrous tyrant".

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    lose his last remaining powers as he was implicated in some of the activities of the gang as Minister for Security. Deng became the unquestioned leader, and he set about transforming China in a way that probably no other country in history has been transformed.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The Russian Revolution acted as a beacon to the workers of the world. In particular, it gave a mighty impetus to the German Revolution. But the cowardice of the Social Democratic leaders in Western Europe led to the defeat of the revolution in Germany, Italy and other countries, and the

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    But in all truth the people whom he expelled were infact the people who helped and supported him the most through the early stages of his leadership. Stalin was not "immersed" in popularity amongst his people but on the other hand he was not despised either.

  1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    The passage was written by him so it will surely be biased and we can never know if it is a true story. Stalin used to tell lies and using the media for his propaganda. If this story happened to be true it shows us that may be Stalin was

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Stalin wouldn�t have mind that this comrade was missing, but as it is wriitten by him he could have changed his statement in order to make the Russian people think that he looks after his comrades as a leader and that he cares about what can happen to them, but the real question is: Who hides after that mask?

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    As well as being paranoid, the source provides evidence as to the fact that Stalin was as well a manipulative man. Through telling what may seem as a simple story he is trying to get the ordinary average people to think he is a nice man, as he cares for

  2. Stalin and Russia - Sources Question

    This source is limited in its value but does give a positive impression. Overall these sources give mixed views on Stalin. 'A' giving a very negative impression and 'B' and 'C' giving positive impressions. However they are not one hundred per cent reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work