• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study carefully all the sources. 'Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War.' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view.

Extracts from this document...


Study carefully all the sources. 'Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War.' Use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view. Throughout the time of the war, women abandoned all aspects of their old lives. Suffragists and suffragettes suspended their campaigns for the vote. Instead they concentrated on setting up unions and leagues to actively encourage men to join the army. For example they published posters urging mothers, sisters, wives, daughters to persuade male family members to sign up. All men who wouldn't sign up were given a white feather, more famously known as the symbol of a coward. Not only did women concentrate on boosting recruitment; they soon replaced male workers doing dangerous and hard jobs in bad conditions where they were occasionally subjected to abuse. The analysis of the following sources will help to prove or disprove the question. Source A is written by a woman who lived through the war. It explains the work that she did after the war broke out and how much she was paid. The letter was written in 1976 but is a primary source. This means that the source needs careful consideration when deciding if it is reliable. The woman's memory may not be accurate so it could be inaccurate, exaggerated, or miss placing vital information. ...read more.


Evidence suggests that the government is actively encouraging women showing a change in society against the norm. This source however does have limits. We are not aware of numbers or how women feel about the work. Or how much they are paid and how hard the work is. But the source fully agrees with the question. It is an essential poster; the government are saying 'we need help - we need women to solve the munitions crisis'. Source F is written record of the numbers of employed in British industries in 1914 and 1918. The huge increase in transport, manufacturing, civil servants and teachers. Women are going into industries previously dominated by men. The only industry out of the group that decreased was domestic service, an industry that women worked in before the war. It was long hours with little pay sometimes just(�2 per month and women, as far as we can see from Source A 'hated every minute of it'. This source is useful because it shows how many more women the government employed. There is no suggestion of what the women or government thought though. The source covers the whole period of the war including the time of the munitions crisis and DORA. Many of the women would have been employed because of either or both of these. The source is, therefore very reliable, because it is highly unlikely to be propaganda or biased. ...read more.


This makes the source unreliable because it is a very biased and exaggerated but still reliable in the sense that we can appreciate how much the government wants to keep morale high and spirits up. The source does agree with the statement for the obvious reason that there is a picture full of female workers near to the end of the war. The majority of sources do agree with the question. Source B, D, E, F, H and I all agree. Source C does definitely not agree and Sources A and C seem to be in the middle. Many of the sources which support the view that 'without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the war.' Much other information helps to support this; DORA was set up to solve the munitions crisis and it used women to help overcome it. Suffragettes and suffragists set up many leagues and acts to persuade women to send their male family members to war. It is fair enough to say that without women, nobody would be there to persuade men to go to war, nobody would be there to supply men with ammunitions, and nobody would be there to nurse the injured soldiers. Not only were women coping with this but also had to face the prospect that they would never see their loves ones again. Without the work of women the war for Britain would not have been possible, let alone Britain winning. 2,497 words Naomi Biddle Coursework 2 Ocober 2002 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    out the truth once again decided to re-examine the history of the empire, it would seem that evidence linked to racism and forced labor were left out from record. It would seem that the British Empire was built on the same principals as that of Hitler and the Nazis, with such view such as dictatorship.

  2. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    Source 3 gives more of an insight and infers they were still contributing to the rise of women, even if it wasn't enfranchisement. * * * I disagree with the statement 'sources 2 and 5 are forms of propaganda and tell us nothing about the work women did in the Great War'.

  1. Women working in WW1. Source D is a picture of women working in ...

    travelling to work, but as we can see from Source D women working in factories are unhappy so the government are 'covering it up' by showing that women enjoy there work, by doing this the government can recruit more women for work in factories.

  2. Haig in sources

    down before they were any where near the trenches because an oncoming horse is a bit obvious. A cavalry charge deployed in the western front was useless, because war had changed since he had active combat in Sudan and the Boer War and Field Marshal Haig never visited the western front or the Somme.

  1. Votes for Women in Britain 1900-1918

    very brave to be putting themselves through such an ordeal for their cause, others just saw it as a ridiculous ploy to gain the public's favouritism and believed that someone who could do that to themselves did not deserve the vote.

  2. "The First World War led to great change in the role of women in ...

    This meant that the Government had fewer things to worry about during the course of the War. The effect of this was the people respected the suffragettes and suffragists for their decisions and were pleased and impressed by the fact that they were helping the war effort by working in factories and taking up jobs on the front lines.

  1. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    The weapons used in World War 1 were more advanced in design and easier to use. New weapons were invented and defensive battle formations developed using trenches, machine guns, grenades, and barbed wire. Soldiers in trenches used a rifle which could fire 15 rounds a minute from 1400 metres away, and had a bayonet to fasten on it.

  2. What was life like for fighting men on the Western Front?

    the protection offered by metal and the mobility provide by tracks that were necessary to cross the muddy and cratered ground. When they first designed them they could carry about two people in and travelled at about 5 miles per hour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work