• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study John Keegan a well respected modern historian, and his views on sir general Haig in the first world war his view on Haig is that he was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much lead Britain to victory in the First World War'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3 I have been set a task to study John Keegan a well respected modern historian, and his views on sir general Haig in the first world war his view on Haig is that he was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much lead Britain to victory in the First World War'. I will now study closely to see if there is enough evidence to support this interpretation using sources and my own knowledge. Firstly I am going to going to look at part of a report written in December 1916, sent by Haig to the British Cabinet about the aftermath of the battle of the Somme, I can clearly see Haig was trying to defend himself he said 'The German Soldiers are practically beaten men' which was true, even Ludendorff the German army commander said 'my army has been fought to a standstill' but when Haig said 'The German casualties our greater than ours' you can see he is twisting the truth, but this source doesn't say much about his efficiency or skills. ...read more.

Middle

The second part was written on 30th June 1916, the day before the attack, he basically says the men are high spirits and confided, and artillery and barbed wire have never been so thorough, by my knowledge I know he was lying, as there was a huge loss of life on the first day, and was trying to make himself look good again. And finally the third part of the source after the big attack, he claimed everything to be going very well, and as I stated before, there was a huge loss of life on the first day, which shows he was clearly lying, this shows him as very inefficient, and it is not a reliable source to back him up as it was written by Haig himself. I am now going to look at a source written by a modern historian Anthony Livesey. He shows weaknesses and flaws of haig in battle, he says "perhaps his greatest failing was his constant, often misplaced optimism, which seemed to stem ...read more.

Conclusion

Nearly there, I have a GCSE modern history report by S.Waburten, it basically says it wasn't all Haig's fault, and he just Contributed to the disaster, this may be true but there is no evidence to support it and again it may show another view to Haig, but is isn't relevant. Finally my last source, a clip from black adder. In the clip Haig is portrayed as a scatterbrain who wasn't really in control when he thought he was, this shows that people even today still see him as the opposite to Keegans view. So using the sources and my own knowledge I can clearly see there is not enough evidence to support Keegans view, he was even nicknamed "the butcher of the somme" and we know Britain was not led to victory as, there was nothing gained by the end of the war but a few kilometres not to mention all the sources are written about the battle of the somme and not the overall war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    in reconnaissance to an active role in battles through the dropping of bombs and firing of machine guns. Finally, we see that not only were British tactics often inexcusable, German tactics could be just as bad. Erich Ludendorff was Germany's chief strategist during World War I, and it was he

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Operation Dynamo exceeded all expectations. A.J.P. Taylor is a very respected historian so I expect this source to be reliable. He is British so he maybe biased towards the allies. However, his book the topic of "English History 1914-1945" does not specify purely on Dunkirk so therefore some pieces of information could be left out or glossed over.

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    "the obvious poverty and deprivation of the town children, not to mention their bad manners." Even though this source is focusing on the negative aspects of evacuation to make it more entertaining, it has a valid point. The evacuees were also very unhealthy and unhygienic, with reports of "urinating on

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Although the British were apparently aware of the policy from the beginning, due to information gleaned from German and escaped British prisoners, they still appeared not to comprehend it's effect on their own plan, and through stupidity, stubbornness or a catastrophic oversight, failed to adapt their own plan.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    It states that 57,970 men were lost on that day and we usually round that figure up to 60000. These are official British Army figures and therefore, we have no reason to question them. With such a grotesque number of casualties, how could zest and idealism still exist in the British lines?

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly ...

    It has to be remembered that, ultimately, Haig was victorious and at the time the war ended, he was treated like a hero. It was only after the war that people began to criticise him and the way the First World War was fought.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    I think that the most important aspect of victory is the military victory, because at the end of the day it is the amount of men saved that counts.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: "The butcher of the Somme?" - source related study.

    But in the 1930s after the wart and soon before the Second World War, Lloyd George came clean about his feelings on the way that Haig fought and controlled the battle. So overall these sources are different be cause Lloyd George had to say different things during and after the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work