• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A was part of a report written in December 1916 by General Haig. It was written to the Cabinet about the aftermath of the Somme. It says that the Somme was a success, that the Germans were ready to surrender and even though they had not gained much land, they had weakened the German army considerably. I agree with source A when it says that the German casualties were higher, which they were. However that is only if you are comparing them with the British casualties not the Allied casualties. ...read more.

Middle

Which it did because the Germans had to take men from Verdun for support at the Somme. This allowed the French to beat them. The battle of the Somme also showed that the British were able to fight for a long period of time without surrendering. I disagree with source A where it says that the Germans were beaten men and that they were ready to surrender. This wasn't true because they clearly weren't ready to surrender because of the spring offensive. They gained back all the land lost in the battle of the Somme and more. Also they weren't expecting defeat, not until the Americans joined the war. Also the fact that the Allies didn't gain much land, which was the entire point of the war, didn't seem to matter to Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

However this is only part of a report written by Haig there could be more on the failures of the battle, however it is unlikely as Haig wouldn't want to admit he'd done anything wrong. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, I disagree with this source. I disagree with this source because of the context in which it is written and who wrote it. As Haig wrote it, it will obviously be biased, as Haig won't want to accept any responsibility for the failures of at the battle of the Somme. Also as it was written to the Cabinet Haig would want to prove to them that he was a capable leader, who could help win the war. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    In what ways does the German account (15H) agree or disagree with British account (15J)?

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    because of the 'phoney war' in which no bombs were dropped on cities. This meant that they would be back in danger zones, which was not a success from the government's point of view. The actual transportation of the children was very well organised; the children were all registered in advance and were put onto the trains efficiently.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    The problem with an eyewitness account is that the eyewitness can only know what is happening in his area. However we do know that all along the line, roughly the same events occurred except between Montabon and the French sector of Mametz where the Surreys and the French did break through the German lines.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    Source E is the mother of a host family looking back, she recalls the evacuees urinating on the walls even though they had 2 toilets within the house. There were reports of children fouling paths and urinating anywhere that suited them.

  1. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    By attacking the major cities Hitler thought that it would break British morale and would force Churchill to give up, but that wasn't the case as they got stronger and more confident. By forcing the Germans to change there tactics, by being quicker and stronger, prevented the Germans and the Luftwaffe achieving victory.

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    Source C is from an interview, years after the battle with a Private George Coppard. In this source he concentrates on the barbed wire and expresses how it bothered him, starting the extract with 'Hundreds of dead were strung out like wreckage washed up to a high-water mark.'

  1. Evacuation was a great success. Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation explain ...

    feeling of the father during the war and about the real option of evacuation of his son. On the negative side this is only the opinion of one parent, and does necessarily represent the opinion of the majority of parents, without further interview extracts it is difficult to gain a true reflection of the feeling of the majority of parents.

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    'The country people were shocked at the obvious poverty and deprivation of the town children...' Unbelievably, the hosts of wealthier origins were shocked that the inner-city children didn't eat caviar and drink high tea! Taken from Source C, that quote concluded with '...not to mention their bad manners.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work