• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A was part of a report written in December 1916 by General Haig. It was written to the Cabinet about the aftermath of the Somme. It says that the Somme was a success, that the Germans were ready to surrender and even though they had not gained much land, they had weakened the German army considerably. I agree with source A when it says that the German casualties were higher, which they were. However that is only if you are comparing them with the British casualties not the Allied casualties. ...read more.

Middle

Which it did because the Germans had to take men from Verdun for support at the Somme. This allowed the French to beat them. The battle of the Somme also showed that the British were able to fight for a long period of time without surrendering. I disagree with source A where it says that the Germans were beaten men and that they were ready to surrender. This wasn't true because they clearly weren't ready to surrender because of the spring offensive. They gained back all the land lost in the battle of the Somme and more. Also they weren't expecting defeat, not until the Americans joined the war. Also the fact that the Allies didn't gain much land, which was the entire point of the war, didn't seem to matter to Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

However this is only part of a report written by Haig there could be more on the failures of the battle, however it is unlikely as Haig wouldn't want to admit he'd done anything wrong. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, I disagree with this source. I disagree with this source because of the context in which it is written and who wrote it. As Haig wrote it, it will obviously be biased, as Haig won't want to accept any responsibility for the failures of at the battle of the Somme. Also as it was written to the Cabinet Haig would want to prove to them that he was a capable leader, who could help win the war. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    This was insinuated in 'losses had been so high that the losses could no longer be replaced'. In the final analysis it is clear from the evidence that source E is more reliable than source D (ii) because it gives a more representative picture of the events.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    From this source, it sort of says that the British didn't really think about their tactics a lot and just went straight into it, and got knocked down one by one.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    Overall, I feel that the message of the cartoon is that the loss of so many men and the lack of ground gained is not the fault of the private, or lieutenant, but the generals who didn't even get their boots dirty.

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    By 1908, most MPs, including most of the Cabinet, openly supported women's suffrage. More than 250 candidates stated their support for votes for women in addresses before the general election of 1910. Asquith, the Prime Minister, promised votes for women in the form of a Parliamentary Reform Bill amendment.

  1. Do you agree with S.Davies' interpretation of the Greg's as employers? - source related ...

    Titus Salt sacked people who drank alcohol. To prevent them drinking in places, no pubs were made in Saltaire. In the 19th century there was a very high death rate in mills and factories. Source C was an interview between the government officials and the superintendents (George and Elizabeth Shawcross)

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success' - Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? ...

    Martin Parsons and Penny Sterns), so we cannot say that one particular type of experience could not have happened to a number of people. However, there are reasons both for and against their reliability. Source C recalls some experiences that can be backed up by other sources and therefore is reliable for some.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    In this case, the interviewee is interpreting her memories of her as a child as an adult, and so it follows that and adult perspective is applied to a situation experienced as a child. For many reason's Source F is quite unreliable.

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    This was a big advantage to Britain as they could basically run a goose change in the air with the German Spitfire, until the Germans ran out of fuel. Britain was the more superior nation in the air as they had the best and fastest planes with better movement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work