• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A was part of a report written in December 1916 by General Haig. It was written to the Cabinet about the aftermath of the Somme. It says that the Somme was a success, that the Germans were ready to surrender and even though they had not gained much land, they had weakened the German army considerably. I agree with source A when it says that the German casualties were higher, which they were. However that is only if you are comparing them with the British casualties not the Allied casualties. ...read more.

Middle

Which it did because the Germans had to take men from Verdun for support at the Somme. This allowed the French to beat them. The battle of the Somme also showed that the British were able to fight for a long period of time without surrendering. I disagree with source A where it says that the Germans were beaten men and that they were ready to surrender. This wasn't true because they clearly weren't ready to surrender because of the spring offensive. They gained back all the land lost in the battle of the Somme and more. Also they weren't expecting defeat, not until the Americans joined the war. Also the fact that the Allies didn't gain much land, which was the entire point of the war, didn't seem to matter to Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

However this is only part of a report written by Haig there could be more on the failures of the battle, however it is unlikely as Haig wouldn't want to admit he'd done anything wrong. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, I disagree with this source. I disagree with this source because of the context in which it is written and who wrote it. As Haig wrote it, it will obviously be biased, as Haig won't want to accept any responsibility for the failures of at the battle of the Somme. Also as it was written to the Cabinet Haig would want to prove to them that he was a capable leader, who could help win the war. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    Source 15.H said, "steady easy pace." But source 15.J said that the first line had nearly reached the German line. So, one source 15.J said that they got there pretty quick, but source 15.H, said that's they are going at a good steady pace.

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    The fact that the interview was taken years after the battle comes into play again questioning his reliability as his negative response might reflect or be influenced by the harsh criticism towards Haig at that time. Although Source C has factors that do question his reliability, I do trust it, as it is a factual account on what he experienced.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    because of the 'phoney war' in which no bombs were dropped on cities. This meant that they would be back in danger zones, which was not a success from the government's point of view. The actual transportation of the children was very well organised; the children were all registered in advance and were put onto the trains efficiently.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    Source E is the mother of a host family looking back, she recalls the evacuees urinating on the walls even though they had 2 toilets within the house. There were reports of children fouling paths and urinating anywhere that suited them.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    It can be fiction. However despite these faults, this extract does seem very factual. The only query that I would have with it is when it mentions a "colonel" addressing the troops. Both the video "Battle of the Somme" (a video made to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the battle)

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    Then they decided to attack the major cities, this was dashed by Beaverbrook's fighter planes so this want achieved either. Therefore the change in tactics did play a big role in Britain wining. Without any leaders, the tow nation probably wouldn't have succeeded as there would be no organisation, without any leaders.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    It shows a disgusting side to the evacuees and shows up their ill-mannered behaviour as well as filthy habits and consequently does not support the evacuation. Although the interview took place in 1988, a long time after the actual event and so some information may have been forgotten changed or exaggerated in people's minds over time.

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    However, Constance Lytton, daughter of Lord Lytton - Viceroy of India, was force fed in 1910 when she had a weak heart. The WSPU made sure this was well publicised as women being unfairly treated and through propaganda got public sympathy again.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work