• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A was part of a report written in December 1916 by General Haig. It was written to the Cabinet about the aftermath of the Somme. It says that the Somme was a success, that the Germans were ready to surrender and even though they had not gained much land, they had weakened the German army considerably. I agree with source A when it says that the German casualties were higher, which they were. However that is only if you are comparing them with the British casualties not the Allied casualties. ...read more.

Middle

Which it did because the Germans had to take men from Verdun for support at the Somme. This allowed the French to beat them. The battle of the Somme also showed that the British were able to fight for a long period of time without surrendering. I disagree with source A where it says that the Germans were beaten men and that they were ready to surrender. This wasn't true because they clearly weren't ready to surrender because of the spring offensive. They gained back all the land lost in the battle of the Somme and more. Also they weren't expecting defeat, not until the Americans joined the war. Also the fact that the Allies didn't gain much land, which was the entire point of the war, didn't seem to matter to Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

However this is only part of a report written by Haig there could be more on the failures of the battle, however it is unlikely as Haig wouldn't want to admit he'd done anything wrong. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, I disagree with this source. I disagree with this source because of the context in which it is written and who wrote it. As Haig wrote it, it will obviously be biased, as Haig won't want to accept any responsibility for the failures of at the battle of the Somme. Also as it was written to the Cabinet Haig would want to prove to them that he was a capable leader, who could help win the war. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Source A depicts evacuees walking to the station in London. This suggests that evacuation was well-ordered as all the children are walking in an orderly fashion; they are all smiling and a few are waving. This shows that the children were content in being evacuated.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success.' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    Other individuals, however, signed up for financial reasons, motivated, no doubt, by the small government allowance and increase in rationed food to cover the cost of looking after children. Source H describes the shortage of host families, "The government are grateful for the 20,000 people ... helping the country. ...

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    Furthermore, the motive of the photograph needs to be examined. It is very probable that the government took the picture and did it to raise the support and publicity for evacuation making this propaganda. If this were the case the government would aim to make evacuation look good meaning they wouldn't show an accurate depiction of evacuation.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    The source shows a varied opinion because the father says some villagers considered sending their children and then changed their mind. Many families did not want to send their children to an unknown family in an unknown destination. Having said that Source I only shows one point of view out

  1. South Africa - source related study

    In sources H and I they are both official sources. Source H is from Colonel Piernaar who was the police commander at Sharpeville. And Source I is from Dr Verwoerd who was the Prime Minister at the time. Source H is a very honest by the Colonel who is

  2. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    Source E is backed up by source D (I); this states 'conditions, mud, cold, rain...' Source D (ii) has numerous shortcomings. Firstly in source D (ii) Lloyd George states the British forces made huge advances, this is illustrated in ' you and your men have never the less driven your

  1. Britain in the age of total War - source related study

    Also, the damage done through the level of suffering in each source is different. Source D shows that the bombing caused homelessness and unhappiness, whereas Source B shows that the bombing caused death. So, in conclusion, we see that the evidence given by Source D does support the evidence given

  2. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    As it is written by Haig who was as far from the battlefield as could possibly be considering he was a leader, much of the information would be incorrect or vague. On the other hand, source C was taken from a public interview, already because there is no desire to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work