• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the Battle of the Somme? Use the source and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. Source A was part of a report written in December 1916 by General Haig. It was written to the Cabinet about the aftermath of the Somme. It says that the Somme was a success, that the Germans were ready to surrender and even though they had not gained much land, they had weakened the German army considerably. I agree with source A when it says that the German casualties were higher, which they were. However that is only if you are comparing them with the British casualties not the Allied casualties. ...read more.

Middle

Which it did because the Germans had to take men from Verdun for support at the Somme. This allowed the French to beat them. The battle of the Somme also showed that the British were able to fight for a long period of time without surrendering. I disagree with source A where it says that the Germans were beaten men and that they were ready to surrender. This wasn't true because they clearly weren't ready to surrender because of the spring offensive. They gained back all the land lost in the battle of the Somme and more. Also they weren't expecting defeat, not until the Americans joined the war. Also the fact that the Allies didn't gain much land, which was the entire point of the war, didn't seem to matter to Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

However this is only part of a report written by Haig there could be more on the failures of the battle, however it is unlikely as Haig wouldn't want to admit he'd done anything wrong. I have therefore come to the conclusion that, I disagree with this source. I disagree with this source because of the context in which it is written and who wrote it. As Haig wrote it, it will obviously be biased, as Haig won't want to accept any responsibility for the failures of at the battle of the Somme. Also as it was written to the Cabinet Haig would want to prove to them that he was a capable leader, who could help win the war. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    In what ways does the German account (15H) agree or disagree with British account (15J)?

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    because of the 'phoney war' in which no bombs were dropped on cities. This meant that they would be back in danger zones, which was not a success from the government's point of view. The actual transportation of the children was very well organised; the children were all registered in advance and were put onto the trains efficiently.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    The problem with an eyewitness account is that the eyewitness can only know what is happening in his area. However we do know that all along the line, roughly the same events occurred except between Montabon and the French sector of Mametz where the Surreys and the French did break through the German lines.

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    He also mentions the wrong use shellfire (shrapnel instead of high explosive) 'Any Tommy could have told them that shell fire lifts wire up and drops it down, often in a worse tangle than before'. We know that when he tells us this he is telling the truth and is trust worthy and reliable.

  1. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    This means that if another battle were to break out, the BEF and army would not have enough equipment and arms to fight as the enemy seized many of them. I consider this speech to be unreliable as it shows bias - Anthony Eden was British and giving a speech to the British public.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    This shows that many evacuees and foster parents were mismatched and from my own studies this was often the case as rich families fostered children from poor families.

  1. South Africa - source related study

    Also the Afrikans knew that they were in a minority, so they had to establish themselves and make the Natives scared of them so they would listen and do what they say. To keep the Africans in line they got the Apartheid laws.

  2. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    This photo shows the children looking happy and says to me that evacuation was a success. "Some children treated it as a great adventure, others quietly sobbed." An extract from Children of the Blitz, Robert Westall, the quote comes from a boy aged 10.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work