• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT 2 Ian Harkness 1. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source A does not appear to be an eye witness account as a third party is reporting on the 'conditions in Russia' after apparently hearing the accounts from 'British refugees' referred to as 'these people'. The only person specifically mentioned is Lenin and a further reference to 'the peasants'. On the other hand, the fact that there are refugees in Britain who have left their homes and fled from Russia supports the claim that conditions are 'unbearable'. Further, that claims are 'unanimous' makes it more believable. It was well known that before this report of October, 1918, that people in Russia were unhappy, indeed the March Revolution of 1917 was a result of very poor economic conditions and there had been great unrest including bread riots. Hence the claim that 'famine is widespread' would also seem believable, although there is no description of the appearance of the refugees in this report. The 'peasants' distrust of Lenin's regime and poor economic conditions are both suggested by the peasants refusing 'to sell food' and resorting to 'barter'. This must mean they have no faith in the currency which must be suffering from deflation. The last claim of 'Lenin and his colleagues...living in luxury' does seem believable. ...read more.

Middle

It suggests that this would be the result of accepting a Trotsky regime rule. At its worst it suggests that the huge Trotsky has an appetite for people's blood which is his only interest and civil war will be the only result of revolution. This party was known commonly as the 'whites'. In contrast the photo-montage in Source E shows Trotsky in positive ways and clearly is pro-Trotsky and pro revolution, known commonly as the 'reds'. The central photograph of Trotsky at his desk writing suggests a professional hard working leader. The other images show Trotsky in a variety of situations and places, such as on board a ship, next to a train, in uniform and speaking to a captive crowd of workers. The overall effect is to suggest that Trotsky is a man who has a wide knowledge and understanding of people's needs which he is working hard to achieve. Notably his facial expressions are all serious which can be interpreted as an awareness of the difficulties others and the whole country face and the concentrated effort needed to solve them. 4. Study Sources F, G and H : Which of these sources is most useful to a historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? None of the sources F, G and H, are very useful for a historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family since pictorial evidence needs to be substantiated by trustworthy eye-witness accounts and to agree. ...read more.

Conclusion

Clearly the first two sources show that Russia's economic problems were very great. Yet it would be unreasonable to suggest that the Bolsheviks engineered an economic decline and they were hardly responsible for involving Russia in the war. Rather than escape Bolshevik rule the refugees surely wished to escape from the harsh conditions in Russia. Finally the sources relating to the murder of the Romanov family seem to most support the view that 'The Bolsheviks were adopting a policy of "win at all costs" '. The painting in particular suggests the resorting to cold-blooded murder to achieve success and is partly supported by the photo and diagram. However, without eye-witness accounts the events which took place are unsubstantiated. For instance, we do not know if the family was unarmed, if resistance was offered, or did they surrender? Yet the family did die and the 'murders' may seem as shocking as the execution depicted on the 1919 Civil war poster. Overall it is clear that a balanced view of biases needs to be taken into account and admit that the evidence is ambiguous. The death of the Romanov family can be seen as a desperate bid to deny them a possibility of any future power and prevent civil war which would allow them to pay attention to its economic crisis, in which case they would be seen as heroes rather than mercenaries. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    She refers to Rasputin as 'our Friend' and also mentions how the information she is giving is 'based on what he dreamed in the night'. This shows the power he had and that even the most inferior things, which would be dismissed if anyone else had said it, has enlightened

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Explain your answer Both sources reliable and are useful evidence about the Cultural Revolution. Source H states the situation by giving the viewer a visual image. It is useful because the viewers are able to see what was actually going on and how the parade was carried out.

  1. The Russian revolution - source related study.

    Source b also gives you extra information as it says 'On July 17 a train left Ekaterinburg and it's believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it'. In source a it says nothing about a train or surviving members.

  2. Stalin, Man or Monster? Source based questions.

    He said "Why should we be concerned about men? We can always make another man." I think Stalin believed this and was using it because he wanted to say what he thought to see how people reacted to it, without them thinking he was evil, but basically putting the idea in their heads for them to think about.

  1. Stalin - Source based work

    The author of Source F Bukharin was a popular right-wing thinker and leader at the time of the Bolshevik revolution. He had originally supported Stalin over Trotsky as successor at Lenin. Once in a position of power Stalin removed all possible rivals, first the left-wingers including Trotsky and then the right-wingers which included Bukharin.

  2. Source A is a report from an American newspaper and it tells us that ...

    This source has come from Medvedev's wife, considering that she was he's wife I assume that she loved him and that she had no reason to lie. Medvedev's wife says, "My husband fired too." Medvedev told one of the other guards that he had "emptied two or three bullets into the Tsar."

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    This makes it less reliable as we can not be at all sure whether the man means it and says what he thinks is the truth. However, on the other hand we can not exclude a possibility that the source could hold some truth in it.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This makes it hard to work out whether Sokolov was telling the truth or making everything up. He wrote it for a book, but parts of it never got published. This makes you wonder whether parts of the source could be false.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work