• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT 2 Ian Harkness 1. Study Source A : Source A must be trustworthy because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source A does not appear to be an eye witness account as a third party is reporting on the 'conditions in Russia' after apparently hearing the accounts from 'British refugees' referred to as 'these people'. The only person specifically mentioned is Lenin and a further reference to 'the peasants'. On the other hand, the fact that there are refugees in Britain who have left their homes and fled from Russia supports the claim that conditions are 'unbearable'. Further, that claims are 'unanimous' makes it more believable. It was well known that before this report of October, 1918, that people in Russia were unhappy, indeed the March Revolution of 1917 was a result of very poor economic conditions and there had been great unrest including bread riots. Hence the claim that 'famine is widespread' would also seem believable, although there is no description of the appearance of the refugees in this report. The 'peasants' distrust of Lenin's regime and poor economic conditions are both suggested by the peasants refusing 'to sell food' and resorting to 'barter'. This must mean they have no faith in the currency which must be suffering from deflation. The last claim of 'Lenin and his colleagues...living in luxury' does seem believable. ...read more.


It suggests that this would be the result of accepting a Trotsky regime rule. At its worst it suggests that the huge Trotsky has an appetite for people's blood which is his only interest and civil war will be the only result of revolution. This party was known commonly as the 'whites'. In contrast the photo-montage in Source E shows Trotsky in positive ways and clearly is pro-Trotsky and pro revolution, known commonly as the 'reds'. The central photograph of Trotsky at his desk writing suggests a professional hard working leader. The other images show Trotsky in a variety of situations and places, such as on board a ship, next to a train, in uniform and speaking to a captive crowd of workers. The overall effect is to suggest that Trotsky is a man who has a wide knowledge and understanding of people's needs which he is working hard to achieve. Notably his facial expressions are all serious which can be interpreted as an awareness of the difficulties others and the whole country face and the concentrated effort needed to solve them. 4. Study Sources F, G and H : Which of these sources is most useful to a historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family? None of the sources F, G and H, are very useful for a historian studying the deaths of the Tsar and his family since pictorial evidence needs to be substantiated by trustworthy eye-witness accounts and to agree. ...read more.


Clearly the first two sources show that Russia's economic problems were very great. Yet it would be unreasonable to suggest that the Bolsheviks engineered an economic decline and they were hardly responsible for involving Russia in the war. Rather than escape Bolshevik rule the refugees surely wished to escape from the harsh conditions in Russia. Finally the sources relating to the murder of the Romanov family seem to most support the view that 'The Bolsheviks were adopting a policy of "win at all costs" '. The painting in particular suggests the resorting to cold-blooded murder to achieve success and is partly supported by the photo and diagram. However, without eye-witness accounts the events which took place are unsubstantiated. For instance, we do not know if the family was unarmed, if resistance was offered, or did they surrender? Yet the family did die and the 'murders' may seem as shocking as the execution depicted on the 1919 Civil war poster. Overall it is clear that a balanced view of biases needs to be taken into account and admit that the evidence is ambiguous. The death of the Romanov family can be seen as a desperate bid to deny them a possibility of any future power and prevent civil war which would allow them to pay attention to its economic crisis, in which case they would be seen as heroes rather than mercenaries. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The Red Guards attacked anything remotely connected with the West, capitalism, the Soviet Union or intellectualism, From source C which was written by an eyewitness account whose father was threatened by the Red Guards and was accused of having "capitalist tiles" Nonetheless, as source F delivers the positive side of

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Some say he was a pure monster and had no good side to him and only had evil intentions. People easily take this view of Stalin because of what he did to the Russian people during the purges. An estimated twenty million, at least, people were murdered, worked or starved to death at labour camps.

  1. Stalin, Man or Monster? Source based questions.

    I think he was trying to make himself seem like the loving, caring man that he wanted people to see him as. This source is very unreliable because Stalin was very consciousness of his image and the way people viewed him, and he knew that he needed the support of people and that image was the way to get it.

  2. The Bolsheviks, Lenin & Stalin - source based quiestions

    Study sources E and F. Which of these two sources is the more reliable? Explain your answer with reference to the source. Source E seems to be less reliable then source F. this is because source E is written for a communist party newspaper, to have been published it would have to favour Stalin.

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Another reason which justifies my answer is that in this source of information Stalin said: �� when I told them off having more concern for animals than for men.�� This Source clearly reflects the opposite reaction to what Stalin had answered when he knew that one comrade was missing.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    In source H, Krushchev picks out a prime example why Stalin was so fuelled with paranoia. A question like, "Why are your eyes so shifty today?" would have been put forward to an innocent civilian. If Stalin did not like their response he then would have killed them.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    The element of unreliability in the source is further emphasised by the fact that if includes "Sergeyev's findings are known only from comments of people who spoke to him or read his report". Similarly, Source B is just a list of assumptions for where the executions of the members of

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    The fatty matter from their corpses ran out and mixed in with the soil.' In addition to this, the detailed and grotesque imagery that is utilized in source C is sharply dissimilar with the language used in sources A and B.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work